North Dakota Republican Party Blog

Democrats- See a Problem, Tax!

2008-06-04T08:17:00.003-05:00

Various analyses show that Lieberman-Warner would result in higher prices at the gas pump, between 41 cents and $1 per gallon by 2030. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says Lieberman-Warner would effectively raise taxes on Americans by more than $1 trillion over the next 10 years. The federal Energy Information Administration says the bill would result in a 9.5% drop in manufacturing output and higher energy costs.

Just add this to the "brillant solution" pile of junk the Dems like Dorgan (windfall profits tax) are proposing. One has to ask, do Democrats hate growth and progress?

In Case You Missed It

2008-06-03T13:15:00.000-05:00

Is Obama Willing To Meet Ahmadinejad, But Not Petraeus?
By Jim Geraghty
The National Review’s Campaign Spot
May 28, 2008 9:47 AM
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTc4ZjBhMjYwOGU0N2RiMDgyMDBmODRiYjc3YWU4MTU=

Obama spokesman Bill Burton, responding to John McCain's suggestion that both he and Obama take a trip to Iraq in the near future:

"John McCain's proposal is nothing more than a political stunt, and we don't need any more 'Mission Accomplished' banners or walks through Baghdad markets to know that Iraq's leaders have not made the political progress that was the stated purpose of the surge. The American people don't want any more false promises of progress, they deserve a real debate about a war that has overstretched our military, and cost us thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars without making us safer."

You know what is intriguingly missing from that answer? Any indication that Obama will return to Iraq before Election Day.

Obama has been to Iraq once, in 2006. It was a two-day tour of the country.

I suppose one can argue about the value of seeing the situation on the ground with one's own eyes, but wouldn't the architect of a withdrawal want to see some of the circumstances himself? Even if Obama didn't want to travel with McCain, is it really wise to suggest that a tour of post-surge Iraq is unnecessary? Wouldn't scheduling a visit defuse criticism like this from Vets for Freedom PAC?

And isn't Obama vulnerable to the argument that a man who's pledged to meet unconditionally, one-on-one, face-to-face with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad really ought to meet at least once one-on-one with Gen. David Petraeus?

A little truthful humor

2008-05-07T12:03:00.000-05:00

McCain's commitment to the Judiciary

2008-05-06T13:06:00.001-05:00

The North Dakota Republican Party commends Senator John McCain’s judicial philosophy and vision for the federal judiciary.
The next President will have the opportunity to nominate hundreds of men and women to the courts – the effects of which will last for many years. To uphold Republican ideals, it’s important that these judges have a proven record of judicial restraint to combat the judicial activism that currently is weakening our federal judiciary.
From the Supreme Court to lower courts, John McCain’s conservative leadership in nominating the right judges will bring about much-needed change to counteract judges who legislate from the bench and distort the Constitution.
________________________________________

JOHN MCCAIN ANNOUNCES HIS JUSTICE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
For Immediate Release Contact: Press Office
Tuesday, May 6, 2008 703-650-5550
ARLINGTON, VA -- Today, U.S. Senator John McCain announced his Justice Advisory Committee to the Campaign. Please find below the Chairs and members of the Committee:
Chairs Of The Justice Advisory Committee:
• Theodore B. Olson -- former Solicitor General of the United States
• Senator Sam Brownback -- United States Senator, Kansas
Steering Committee
• Michael Abramowicz -- Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School
• Hon. William P. Barr -- former Attorney General of the United States
• Gerard V. Bradley -- Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School
• Rachel Brand -- former Assistant Attorney General for Office of Legal Policy
• Steven Calabresi -- George C. Dix Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law
• Dean Ronald A. Cass -- Chairman, Center for the Rule of Law; Dean Emeritus, Boston University School of Law
• Senator Daniel Coats -- former United States Senator, Indiana
• Manus M. Cooney -- former Chief Counsel and Staff Director, U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary
• Charles J. Cooper -- former Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel
• Arthur B. Culvahouse, Jr. -- former White House Counsel to President Ronald Reagan
• Carol E. Dinkins -- Partner, Vinson & Elkins
• John F. Duffy -- Oswald Symister Colclough Research Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School
• Miguel A. Estrada -- former Assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States
• Charles Fried -- Beneficial Profes sor of Law, Harvard Law School; former Solicitor General of the United States
• Sandra S. Froman -- Arizona attorney
• Richard W. Garnett -- Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School
• Robert P. George -- McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, Princeton University
• Senator Lindsey Graham -- United States Senator, South Carolina
• Senator Phil Gramm -- former United States Senator, Texas
• Governor Frank Keating -- former Governor of Oklahoma
• Orin S. Kerr -- Professor, George Washington Universit y Law School
• Senator Jon Kyl -- United States Senator, Arizona
• Christopher Landau -- Partner, Kirkland & Ellis LLP
• Senator Trent Lott -- former United States Senator, Mississippi
• Randy Mastro -- former Deputy Mayor of New York City
• John O. McGinnis -- Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law
• Maureen E. Mahoney -- former Deputy Solicitor General of the Unites States
• Thomas W. Merrill -- Charles Keller Beekman Professor, Columbia Law School
• Marc L. Mukasey -- Partner, Bracewell & Giuliani LLP ; former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York
• Caleb Nelson -- Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law
• Eileen J. O'Connor -- former Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division, U.S. Department of Justice
• Hon. Thomas R. Phillips -- former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas
• Edward R. Reines -- Partner, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
• Kristi L. Remington -- former Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Legal Policy
• Professor Daniel B. Rodriguez -- Minerva House Drysdale Regents Chair in Law, The University of Texas at Austin Scho ol of Law
• Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz -- Associate Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
• Ronald D. Rotunda -- University Professor and Professor of Law, George Mason University
• Cathy Cleaver Ruse -- Senior Fellow for Legal Studies at the Family Research Council; Governor, Ave Maria School of Law
• Peter B. Rutledge -- Associate Professor of Law, University of Georgia School of Law
• Jon A. Sale -- former federal prosecutor for NY and Miami; former law professor, Nova Southeastern and St. Thomas
• John Smietanka -- former U.S. attorney
• Stephen F. Smith -- Professor of Law, John V. Ray Research Professor, University of Virginia School of Law
• George J. Terwilliger, III -- former Deputy Attorney General of the United States
• Senator Fred Thompson -- former United States Senator, Tennessee
• Eugene Volokh -- Gary T. Swartz Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law
• Dan K. Webb -- Chairman, Winston & Strawn; former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois
###

The end to our Mid-east Dependence

2008-04-28T09:16:00.002-05:00

With all the oil development going on in North Dakota, Americans will be greatly benefitting from our own domestic reserves. But, we all know that our energy needs can not be met here in North Dakota alone. Enter Brazil.

New oil finds in Brazil could mean more and more oil on the market as well as a shake up in the Mid-east oil Cartel.

OBAMA’S FALSE INTEGRETY ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT

2008-04-23T15:00:00.000-05:00

BISMARCK, ND – North Dakota state leaders are calling into question some recent movements by Sen. Barack Obama to appear in greater favor of gun owner rights. State Representatives Al Carlson and Todd Porter have taken issue with the Democrat’s position.

“Sen. Obama is simply posturing to save face after his recent gaff attacking Second Amendment supporters. North Dakotans understand the great need for the Second Amendment, and is why I ask North Dakota Democrats to examine if Obama truly has the judgment to be Commander-In-Chief,” said Carlson.

Obama had recently made the statement saying that "they cling to guns and religion, and antipathy towards people that aren't like us" as a result of our "bitterness” referring to rural America.

Rep. Todd Porter has been a leader in the North Dakota House on gun owner rights. He has brought about legislation to ensure that homeowners can defend their homes and families without threat of lawsuit by criminals.

“It saddens me,” states Porter. “The thought that the work of the North Dakota legislature would be overturned by an out-of-state politician, such as Obama, really puts a blow to the Constitution and the Federal process.”

OBAMA HAS A LONG ANTI-GUN RECORD

OBAMA WANTS TO BAN MANY TYPES OF FIREARMS

Obama Has Come Out In Support Of Banning Handguns, Hunting Firearms And So-Called “Assault Weapons”:

In Response To A 1996 Independent Voters Of Illinois Questionnaire, Obama Indicated That He Supported Banning The “Manufacture, Sale And Possession Of Handguns.” Question: “Do you support state legislation to … ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns?” Obama’s Response: “Yes.” (Independent Voters Of Illinois Independent Precinct Organization 1996 General Candidate Questionnaire, Barack Obama Responses, 9/9/96)

• During 4/16 Dem. Debate, Obama Falsely Claimed His Handwriting Did Not Appear On Questionnaire. “Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., maintained at Wednesday’s ABC News debate in Philadelphia that his handwriting does not appear on a 1996 questionnaire stating support for a ban on the manufacture, sale, and possession of handguns. The Democratic presidential frontrunner made this claim even though a copy of the original document suggests otherwise. … When asked about the gun questionnaire with the handwriting on it, Obama adviser Robert Gibbs did not dispute that the writing was Obama’s.” (Teddy Davis and Talal Al-Khatib, “Obama Forgets Writing On Gun Questionnaire,” ABC News’ “Political Radar” Blog, www.abcnews.com, 4/16/08)

Scholar John Lott Recalls Obama Stating: “I Don’t Believe That People Should Be Able To Own Guns.” John Lott: “In fact, I knew Obama during the mid-1990s, and his answers to IVI’s question on guns fit well with the Obama that I knew. Indeed, the first time I introduced myself to him he said ‘Oh, you are the gun guy.’ I responded ‘Yes, I guess so.’ He simply responded that ‘I don’t believe that people should be able to own guns.’” (John R. Lott, Jr., “Obama And Guns: Two Different Views,” Fox News, www.foxnews.com, 4/7/08)

Obama Supported Banning “The Sale Or Transfer Of All Forms Of Semi-Automatic Weapons.” According to his responses to an Illinois State Legislative Election 1998 National Political Awareness Test, Obama pledged to “Ban the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons.” (Project Vote Smart Website, www.votesmart.org, Accessed 3/5/08)

In 2003, Obama Voted In Support Of Legislation That “Would Have Banned Most Of The Privately Held Hunting Shotguns, Target Rifles, And Black Powder Rifles” In Illinois. “[I]n 2003, Obama voted in support of SB1195, which, if passed, would have banned most of the privately held hunting shotguns, target rifles, and black powder rifles in the state. If the ban was enacted, law enforcement officials would have been authorized to forcibly enter private homes to confiscate newly banned firearms.” (Illinois State Rifle Association, “ISRA Blasts Candidate Obama On His Record Of Hostility Toward Law-Abiding Firearm Owners,” Press Release, 8/24/04)

In A 2004 Candidate Questionnaire, Obama Supported Banning So-Called “Assault Weapons.” Question: “Do you support legislation to ban the manufacture, sale and possession of … assault weapons?” Obama’s Response: “Yes.” (Lynn Sweet, “Obama’s 2003 IVI-IPO Questionnaire May Be Getting Closer Scrutiny,” Chicago Sun-Times’ “The Scoop From Washington” Blog, http://blogs.suntimes.com, 12/11/07)

OBAMA HAS TAKEN A NUMBER OF ANTI-GUN POSITIONS

Obama Has Received “F” Ratings From The National Rifle Association:

In 2004, 2002 And 1998, Obama Received “F” Ratings From The National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund. The NRA has given Obama 3 “F’s.” (National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund Website, www.nrapvf.org, Accessed 1/8/08; National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund Website, www.nrapvf.org, Accessed 1/8/08; 1998 Illinois National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund Political Preference Chart, p.2)

Obama Has A Long Anti-Gun Record:

Obama Wants To Turn Law-Abiding Gun Owners Who Are Victims Of Theft Into Felons. “Obama is proposing to make it a felony for a gun owner whose firearm was stolen from his residence which causes harm to another person if that weapon was not securely stored in that home.” (Chinta Strausberg, “Obama Unveils Federal Gun Bill,” Chicago Defender, 12/13/99)

In 2004, Obama Voted Against Self-Defense Rights. “[Obama] opposed letting people use a self-defense argument if charged with violating local handgun bans by using weapons in their homes. The bill was a reaction to a Chicago-area man who, after shooting an intruder, was charged with a handgun violation.” (“Obama Record May Be Gold Mine For Critics,” The Associated Press, 1/17/07)
Obama Pressed To Require Gun Owners To Supply Photos And Fingerprints To State Officials. “Sen. Barack Obama of Chicago called the Democrats’ proposed crackdown ‘not only constitutional, but eminently reasonable.’ … The proposals would: … Make gun owners apply in person for Firearm Owner Identification cards and supply their photos and fingerprints.” (Sean Noble, “Senate Democrats’ Proposals Take Aim At Weapons Control,” The [Springfield, IL] State Journal-Register, 2/15/01)

Running For The U.S. Senate In 2004, Obama Advocated National Gun-Control Legislation. “On the issue of prohibiting citizens from carrying concealed weapons, Obama said he believes national legislation should be passed to ‘prevent other states’ laws [allowing citizens to conceal their guns] from threatening the safety of Illinois residents.’” (John Chase, “Keyes, Obama Are Far Apart On Guns,” Chicago Tribune, 9/15/04)

Obama Has Expressed His Opposition To Concealed Carry. Obama: “I mean, I am consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry.” (David Mendell, “Obama Has Center In His Sights,” Chicago Tribune, 4/27/04)

In 2001, Obama Voted Against A Bill To Allow Individuals To Carry A Concealed Weapon When They Have A Valid Order Of Protection Out Against Another Person. (S.B. 604, Senate Floor Third Reading, Failed, 29-27-0, 4/4/01, Obama Voted Nay)

Obama Believes The DC Gun Ban Is Constitutional. “Obama believes the D.C. handgun law is constitutional.” (James Oliphant and Michael J. Higgins, “Court To Hear Gun Case,” Chicago Tribune, 11/20/07)

In 2005, Obama Voted Twice To Hold Manufacturers, Distributors, Dealers And Importers Of Firearms And Ammunition Liable For The Acts Of Criminals. (S. 397, CQ Vote #206: Motion Agreed To 66-32: R 53-1; D 13-30; I 0-1, 7/26/05, Obama Voted Nay; S. 397, CQ Vote #219: Passed 65-31: R 50-2; D 14-29; I 1-0, 7/29/05, Obama Voted Nay)

- END -

GOP in the Valley

2008-04-11T15:37:00.002-05:00

Well its been a while since I gave an update of what I have been doing. So here we go.

What a tremendous State Convention we had in Fargo. The enthusiasm was very high and we nominated a fantasic slate of Candidates. Brian Kalk is going to be our next Public Sevice Commissioner.

Since the completion of the state convention, we have been having district endorsing conventions throughout the state. We have some of the best candidates we have ever put forward in recent times. I really want to thank everyone that has stepped forward and made the commitment to their district and state.

At these endorsing conventions we are seeing huge turnouts. District 26 held their convention in Oaks and over 120 people showed to have dinner and endorse Nell Walstead, Jiggs Dyste, and Gary Schnell for the legislature. These are three teriffic candidates that will win.

In Mayville, District 20 endorsed Marty Johnson, Jake Holm and Larry O'Brien as their candidates. This is a truly diverse slate of candidates that bring knowledge, experience and enthusiasm to the ticket. A great crowd showed up for what is the first major Republican event in this district in far too long.

District 24 endorsed Dwight Grotberg, Jon Wager and Dwight Kiefert as their choice and a tightly packed room was very much ready to see a change in leadership. Earlier in the year they held a Lincoln Day dinner that had about 80 people present.

Up in District 16 we had a fantasitic crowd of 75plus present to endorse myself, Joe Miller, Phyllis Schindele, and Rep. Joyce Kingsbury. It was so much fun and thank to Brian Kalk for coming.

So as you can see the Party is really getting strong and there is a lot of excitment out there for Republicans. Democrats may have their millions in out-of-state money but we have real support where it counts!

Deception in Washington

2008-04-07T11:24:00.000-05:00

Here's what the Dems bring to North Dakota

2008-04-04T09:12:00.000-05:00

McCain Running Strongly In Some Key Democratic States

2008-04-01T08:35:00.000-05:00

From CQ Politics

By CQ Staff
March 31, 2008

Arizona Sen. John McCain is running strongly in three states that have been solidly Democratic in recent presidential elections; a particular surprise is New Jersey where, a month ago, New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton had a double-digit lead, according to a new round of state-by-state general election match-ups.

The series of polls by Rasmussen Reports, which included Michigan and Washington State, also underscored what most other national and state polling has found - high negatives for Clinton as far as favorability ratings. McCain often scores the highest favorability ratings ...

Rasmussen says McCain and the Democrats are in a statistical tie in New Jersey, with McCain leading Clinton 45 percent to 42 percent and Obama by 46 percent to 45 percent, with a 4 point margin of error. ...

McCain is also running a close race with the Democrats in Michigan, according to the Rasmussen survey conducted March 25. He leads Obama 43 percent to 42 percent, and Clinton by 45 percent to 42 percent, with a 4.5 percent margin of error.

McCain is viewed favorably by 55 percent of voters, Obama by 50 percent and Clinton by 47 percent. This is a state the Democrats have carried in the last four elections. It is also one of the two states (the other being Florida) where the controversy continues over the Democratic Party's decision to strip both of their delegates for breaking party rules by moving up the dates of their primaries. ...

And in Washington State, Rasmussen finds McCain is competitive with both Democrats, according to a poll conducted March 27. ... [M]cCain leads Clinton 46 percent to 43 percent. ... The last time a Republican won this state was in the Ronald Reagan landslide of 1984. ...

To View The Entire Article

In Obama's New Message, Some Foes See Old Liberalism

2008-03-26T08:40:00.000-05:00

From The Washington Post

By Alec MacGillis
March 26, 2008

[A]s Obama heads into the final presidential primaries, Sen. John McCain and other Republicans have already started to brand him a standard-order left-winger, "a down-the-line liberal," as McCain strategist Charles R. Black Jr. put it, in a long line of Democratic White House hopefuls.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign has also started slapping the L-word on Obama, warning that his appeal among moderate voters will diminish as they become more aware of liberal positions he took in the past, such as calling for single-payer health care and an end to the U.S. embargo against Cuba. ...

The double-barreled attack has presented Democratic voters with some persistent questions about Obama: Just how liberal is he? ...

In most major areas, Obama has taken positions that would seem to conform to the Republican stereotype of a liberal. Like Clinton, he favors expanding the government's role in delivering health care ... He would go a step further than Clinton by lifting the limit on income taxed for Social Security, now $100,000, to set that program on firm footing.

He strongly supports abortion rights and spoke out against a Supreme Court ruling last year that upheld a ban on the procedure that some call "partial-birth" abortion. He favors allowing illegal immigrants to get driver's licenses (after some hesitation, Clinton came out against that). He is outspoken on civil rights, and he has opposed Bush's judicial picks, staying out of a bipartisan effort to approve some nominees. ... [A]s a Senate candidate in 2004 he expressed support for strict gun control, decriminalizing marijuana and ending federal mandatory minimum prison sentences, issues he now rarely raises on the trail. ...

[H]e has opened the door to Republican caricature with his call to negotiate with hostile governments, and has been endorsed by the activist group MoveOn.org. ...

But whatever Obama's motivation, [American Enterprise Institute's Andrew] Biggs said, his platform is still liberal. "He's taken all these left-wing positions, and how do you get out of it later?" he said. "He doesn't have the appearance of a tax-and-spend liberal . . . but if the essence of being a tax-and-spend liberal is a lot of taxes and spending, that's what he comes down to." ...

To View The Entire Article, Please Visit:

McCain Now Leads

2008-03-20T10:39:00.003-05:00

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows John McCain’s lead growing against both potential Democratic opponents. McCain currently leads Barack Obama 49% to 42% and Hillary Clinton 51% to 41% margin (see recent daily results).

This is good news for Republicans nationwide. This means the tide is turning against the inaction and lies of the Democrats. Americans know who they can trust and better ideas for leading country come from Republicans. The Democrats said they would end earmarks and reign in spending, and they haven't.

The North Dakota delegation with their Democrat collegues in Congress have not been able to pass a farm bill, have failed to bring real solutions for winning the war, and insist on raising taxes while increasing spending. The obivious conclusion is THEY ARE NOT FIT TO LEAD!

Under The Radar, Some Positive Polling

2008-03-17T17:24:00.000-05:00

From U.S. News & World Report

By Kenneth T. Walsh
March 14, 2008

White House strategists are feeling a new rush of optimism about President Bush's remaining 10 months in office. ... [A] new internal Republican poll, obtained by U.S. News, which indicates that ... some of his major policies have become quite popular. If Bush and his surrogates can make the policies better known, GOP strategists believe that will lift not only Bush's approval ratings but the overall standing of his party. ...

GOP pollster Ed Goeas of the Tarrance Group [writes] ... "Fully 56 percent of likely voters approve of the president personally, driven by voter sentiments that he is a person of strong moral character and integrity,"...

About 64 percent of likely voters approve of Bush's economic stimulus package passed earlier this year; 67 percent back his initiatives to help struggling homeowners survive the current mortgage crisis; 70 percent endorse his plan to allow monitoring of foreign communications of suspected terrorists; and 72 percent back his visit to the Mideast to promote peace. In addition, 52 percent approve of his surge of U.S. troops into Iraq. ...

To View The Entire Article, Please Visit: http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/politics/2008/03/14/under-the-radar-some-positive-polling_print.htm

Dorgan's Numbers

2008-03-17T16:53:00.001-05:00

The Ethics of Dorgan and the 5.6 Trillion

Conrad's Numbers

2008-03-14T12:45:00.003-05:00

Here is are a couple presentation by a concerned citizen on Conrad's rhetoric about the Bush Administration.

Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND) - Ethics - $5.6 Trillion Surplus

Democratic Response to Bush Budget Analyzed - 2

Dorgan supported the War, but thats about it!

2008-03-13T16:39:00.004-05:00

Agree or disagree with the war, (Senator Dorgan agreed with it before he disagreed with it) we know the troop surge has been effective. We also know that the Iraqis are making slow but sure progress.

Now this next video is apparently from some left-wing group, but I find what Senator Dorgan is saying to be a little ridiculous.

The soldier in the video is simply advocating we stay the course and win the war. That fighting our enemies in Iraq is better than them coming here. He did not, as Senator Dorgan insists, suggest that Saddam Hussien attacked us. What the video suggests is that old policies had failed and America can no longer allow dangerous regimes to threaten our nation and allies.

The truth is we need to succeed in Iraq, and simple rhetoric from Dorgan doesn't do anything to help that. If he has a better plan to win, let's hear it.

Who is Jack Murtha?

2008-03-12T14:19:00.002-05:00

Pomeroy Votes to Divert Intellegence Funding for "Climate Change"

2008-03-12T09:04:00.002-05:00

Rep. Earl Pomeroy joined a choir of liberal Democrats in voting to strip our nation's intellegence funding and put it into pet projects, including useless studies on climate change.

Pomeroy joined support of Jack Murtha's proposal to fund a bloated agency with a $40 million annual budget and funding for studies measuring the risk of "global warming" on national security.(House Roll Call 117).

Earl Pomeroy's record has continually moved leftward as the longer he is in Washington. The saga continues of doing one thing in Washington and saying another in North Dakota, but now Pomeroy is ignoring very important intellegnce legislation and favoring expensive yet ineffective pet projects.

True Character

2008-03-11T11:42:00.000-05:00

Conrad, Dorgan and Pomeroy are Gearing-up to Raise Your Taxes

2008-03-11T10:17:00.000-05:00

It’s a funny thing how a politician can continually rest on the belief that he is a “fiscal hawk” but yet endorse huge spending increases, huge tax increases, and still fail to balance the budget. Democrats campaigned on change in 2006 and still campaign on change today.

Yeah, I think we do need change!

We need to change Washington and eliminate the continuation of these empty promises from our congressional delegation. The Democrats have failed to address any of the problems they said they would and today, under their congressional leadership, we have rising energy and food costs; a grim housing market; and more and more restriction on our private property rights.

Recently we have seen the Democrats reveal their new killer dog, the 2008 budget. If unleashed, it will:

• Raise taxes on the average tax payer of North Dakota by $2,614
• Will be the largest tax hike in American History
• 6 million current tax exempt Americans will receive a tax penalty
• Will not fix the AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax)
• Imposes huge spending increases
• More bankrupting entitlement programs
• Increases Debt
• Fails to adequately fund the troops

The Democrats cannot be trusted. Our congressman joined in a unanimous vote against a moratorium on earmarks, directly going against the campaign rhetoric of the 2006 Democrat campaign.

Learn more here.

New RNC Victory Chairwoman

2008-03-07T15:49:00.001-06:00

Who is better for the economy?

2008-03-06T10:23:00.003-06:00

Go to this link and tell me who really stands up for the lower and middle classs.

Meanwhile you have Democrats like, Kent Conrad, proposing spending increase and tax hikes on all Americans.

Can America afford the Democrat Party?

McCain Can!

2008-03-04T22:09:00.004-06:00

From The Washington Post
Peter Slevin
Mar 4, 2008

The cheer went up at 8:05 p.m. Lone Star time, when CNN called Texas -- and the Republican nomination -- for Sen. John McCain. Eight years after he lost a presidential race, and eight months after his campaign was given up for dead, he earned a trip to the finals...

"They are liberal Democrats. I am a conservative Republican," McCain said. "Whether we want the government to take more of your money or whether families will spend that money...Whether we will declare surrender in Iraq, set a date for withdrawal, or we will continue the surge that has succeeded."

Senator John McCain has secured the nomination for President. Mike Huckabee has bowed out after a long and hard fought race. Republicans are now charged with pulling together and defeating the left. Let's not waiver and let's win.

Conrad’s Fiscal Credibility in Question

2008-03-03T12:32:00.001-06:00

A cord has been struck! Senator Kent Conrad’s response to Renae Michell’s letter, “Debt has a Moral Dimension” was an interesting response to what was a direct question. Foremost Conrad failed to answer Mitchell’s questions and concerns.

The national debt needs to become an issue that Americans take seriously, but we need to understand what the concerns are and why we need to resolve them in a timely manner. Shifting blame to others does not solve the issue, and words cannot rectify our deficits. Real commitment on all budgetary issues is what is needed. However, Senator Conrad says one thing and does another.

Conrad says “addressing (federal debt) has been one of the central tenets of my Senate career”, but has continually opposed the Balanced Budget Amendment and the Line Item Veto. He says “everything would be on the table” when addressing fiscal issues, yet he opposed limits on the amounts of direct payments a farm may receive- a measure that was sponsored by Senator Dorgan and would greatly benefit young farmers in North Dakota.

Introducing a bill in Congress can’t serve as excuse for action. A man in Senator Conrad’s position doesn’t need permission from the entire Congress and the President to begin task forces and bring people together for the sake our country. True leaders don’t sit on the sidelines and wait for something to happen they make things happen now. The nation’s debt has been lingering for a great number of years and there needs to an accountability held by the voters to elect people that want correct the problem rather than just give it lip service.

Conrad also found it necessary to attack President Bush and the tax cuts the Congress enacted under his administration. It seems dishonest for the Senator to insist that allowing over-taxed taxpayers to keep more of their money is contributing to the deficit. Only over-spending by the government contributes to deficits. The Congress knows what its revenues are when they make a budget. If there is going to be less money, there needs to be less spending.

One’s words lose creditability when they preach about fiscal restraint but then lend support to a person, such as Barack Obama, that pushes for a near trillion dollar increase in spending from the US treasury to UN programs. Senator Conrad needs to be honest with himself and the people of North Dakota, and bring real action on deficit and debt relief.

Merle Boucher Unaware of Progress in North Dakota

2008-03-03T09:53:00.001-06:00

In a recent videotaped interview with editor of the Bismarck Tribune, Democrat Gubernatorial candidate Merle Boucher displayed his lack of knowledge of the progress that North Dakota has made under strong Republican leadership. In this instance Boucher stated that “the economy is robust at the present time, our tax collections are very robust and yet at the same time our numbers of people aren’t growing.”

Boucher is either ignorant of the facts, or he is purposely trying to mislead the people of North Dakota. In either case, Boucher does not display the qualities that the people of North Dakota expect in their political leaders.

When it comes to population, the fact is that the decades old trend of population loss has turned around. In fact, since 2003 our state’s population has risen by more than 6,500 people. Last year alone the population increased by 2,255 people.

Republicans have helped the state to grow and diversify its economy leading to a growth of more than 30,000 new jobs since 2000. Our wages and incomes are rising faster than the national average. And, our economy continues to grow by more than $1 billion per year.

Boucher’s recent attempts to deny the truth show that the only hope the Democrats have is to hide the facts about our state’s progress.

Don't Miss Statewide Lincoln Day Dinner with Governor John Hoeven

2008-02-27T12:29:00.002-06:00

Tomorrow is the Statewide Lincoln Day Dinner featuring Governor Hoeven as the guest speaker. You may still buy tickets for this event - Call Headquarters at 701.255.0030 and ask for Darcy.

The Lincoln Day Dinner will be held at the Ramkota Hotel in Bismarck
Social begins at 5:30 pm with Dinner at 6:30.
Tickets are $30, or buy a table for $240

See you there!

Is this Fiscally Responsible?

2008-02-26T17:48:00.004-06:00

Recently Senator Kent Conrad had this letter in the Fargo Forum. A response to a letter critical of him for supporting Obama. In it Conrad claims Obama has a long term plan to resolve national debt.

President leaves nation deep in debt
Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D. Washington
Opinion - 02/25/2008

Renae Mitchell’s letter, “Debt has a moral dimension,” (Feb. 16) is correct to raise alarm bells about our growing federal debt. I share her concerns. That is why I have been warning about the threat of debt for years. In fact, addressing this issue has been one of the central tenets of my Senate career.

Unfortunately, the next president is going to inherit a fiscal mess from President Bush. His deficit-financed tax cuts and deficit-financed Iraq war spending have exploded our national debt at the worst possible time -- just as the baby boom generation is beginning to retire. In the years ahead, the combination of the baby boom retirement and rising health-care costs will further raise our national debt to an unsustainable level.

In response, most recently, I have introduced a bipartisan fiscal task force bill along with my Republican counterpart on the Senate Budget Committee, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H. Our bill would create a bipartisan panel of lawmakers and administration officials tasked with crafting a legislative proposal that would address the long-term imbalance between federal spending and revenues. Everything would be on the table. The task force’s proposal would be considered on a fast-track basis and, unlike other commissions, would require an up-or-down vote by Congress.

My concern about debt and our long-term outlook is one of the chief reasons why I support Sen. Barack Obama’s candidacy. Obama is committed to confronting our long-term fiscal challenges and, importantly, supports the general approach of my bipartisan fiscal task force bill. We need a president who won’t be afraid to make the tough choices that lay ahead. Obama is the best candidate to put our country back on a sound fiscal course.

An alarming and unknown peice of legislation that is making its way through the Congress in a stealthy manner is this Gobal Poverty Act S. 2344 sponsored by Senator Barack Obama.

An Accuracy in Media article discuss the fiscal impact of the bill.

A nice-sounding bill called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations.

Senator Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has not endorsed either Senator Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton in the presidential race. But on Thursday, February 14, he is trying to rush Obama's "Global Poverty Act" (S.2433) through his committee. The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends.

Obama’s Global Tax Proposal Up for Senate Vote -Cliff Kincaid February 12, 2008

This is truly alarming and completely fiscally irresponsible for our nation to begin such an incredible financial commitment to the United Nations. In addition, this give a substantial amount of power to the UN.

This bill is heralded as Obama's hallmark legislation, and is really the only significant piece of legislation that Obama has had his name attached too. This is pretty telling of Obama's real philosophy and true left leanings. It also calls into question Senator Conrad's supposed commitment to national debt stablization and relief.

Olafson, Damschen, and Monson Endorsed by District 10 Republicans

2008-02-25T23:20:00.002-06:00

CAVALIER, ND- Following the Feb. 5th Super Tuesday Caucus in Cavalier, Sen. Curtis Olafson, Rep. Chuck Damschen, and Rep. David Monson all received the District 10 Republican Party endorsement for the 2008 legislative election.

Sen. Olafson is from rural Mountain and is a partner in a family business with interests in farming, ranching and earthmoving construction. Olafson was appointed to the Senate in December of 2006 to fill the remainder of the term of former Sen. Tom Trenbeath, who accepted the position of Chief Deputy Attorney General. Olafson was named the 2007 “Legislator of the Year” by the North Dakota Township Officers Association, being the first time a freshman legislator was honored with the award. Olafson is married to Bjork Eiriksdottir, a native of Iceland, and has two children and three step-children.

Rep. Chuck Damschen, a farmer near Hampden, is seeking his second term of office. Damschen has served on the House Agriculture and Human Services committees bringing experience and knowledge to the table in an even-headed and direct manner. His service in the legislature, as well as on several community boards, has greatly benefited the area. Damschen is Vice Chairman of the Natural Resources committee and received the “Board Award” from the North Dakota Hunter Educators Association. He and his wife, Alice, have three children.

Rep. David Monson, a farmer and school teacher from the Osnabrock area, is the current House Assistant Majority Leader. In his position as assistant leader and on the House Appropriations committee, Monson has worked to bring commonsense solutions to funding issues that deal with everything from education to agriculture. Monson has been a strong leader at the fore front of the legalization of industrial hemp. He is committed to removing restrictions that tie the hands of North Dakota’s farmers and industries. He and his wife, Mary, have three children.

District 10 GOP Chairman, Steve Holm, believes that this team will not only win in November but will deliver for Northeastern North Dakota.

“I feel our legislators have shown they are competent, proven leaders, and they have continually demonstrated their abilities to bring new ideas and critical thought to the legislative process,” said Holm.

GOP in the Valley

2008-02-19T08:44:00.002-06:00

The District 12 and 29 Republicans (Jamestown, Verona and Carrington) held their annual Lincoln Day Dinner this last Saturday in Jamestown. It was a very well attended event with over 100 people present. Governor Hoeven and First Lady Mikey were the Guests of Honor. In addition all of those running for statewide office were present and gave campaign updates. Senator Dave Nething made it official that he is seeking another term in the state Senate. Congratulations to Delores Rath, Tom Christensen and all those involved in making that night a success.

The District 24 Republicans held their Lincoln Day Dinner in Valley City at Sabir's Restaurant. Another well attended event with about 70 folks out for the evening. Lt. Governor Jack Dalrymple and his wife Betsy were present and the Lt. Governor gave the keynote address. Dalrymple emphasized the importance of supporting our candidates and the excitement behind the Public Service Commission race. Chairman Ed Kuhlmann and the district leaders should be proud of the successful evening.

Clearly the GOP is experiencing excitement and promise. Our leaders are committed to good government and winning elections, and with leaders like Delores Rath, Tom Christiansen, and Ed Kuhlmann we will see victory in November. If you have never been involved before, the time is now to get involved. Don't let opportunity pass you by, these elections are important. Become a delegate, a candidate, a volunteer, or a donor and increase your impact on your community and party. Democracy depends on individuals being leaders and participating in the discussion of things that matter and impact our daily lives. Get involved today!

Joe Miller

Deputy Director-Valley Region

Contact me at joe.miller@ndgop.org

Republican for a Reason

2008-02-17T10:39:00.001-06:00

In the spirit of the President's Day weekend let's remember why we are Republicans!

GOP in the Valley

2008-02-14T10:27:00.009-06:00

Work is carrying on as we have moved passed the Super Tuesday Caucus. Republicans in North Dakota seem very charged up and ready to get their hands dirty. I have been traveling to various meetings up and down the Valley the past few weeks. Most recently I was in Grand Forks for the district nominating convention. This convention is for the nomination of delegates to the state convention March 28th-30th in Fargo. There was a great turnout of folks for this event. Governor Hoeven, Insurance Commissioner Hamm, Public Service Commissioner Candidates Risher, Stenehjem, and Kalk, and several legislators from the city were all present. District 42 and Region II chairman, Jerry Youngberg, presided over the event in the absence of the Grand Forks Coordinating Committee Chair, Jim Holdman who was out of town. There is a renewed spirit in Grand Forks and an enthusiasm that will be the tides of victory come November.

I have been speaking to many legislators and legislative candidates for the past month. They are all ready to hit the campaign trail hard to spread the good word of the North Dakota economy and how North Dakotan’s are responsible for it. North Dakota Republicans have a lot to point to for accomplishments over the past few sessions. They have created budget stabilization funds, held the line on taxes and delivered for needed changes in infrastructure in our roads, schools and universities.

Democrats have been trying to politicize the WSI issue for more than a year now. Every time a concern of theirs is addressed they change the issue. The current state of the Democrats mantra of talking points has changed so much from its original point that I wonder if they even know what they are saying anymore. Obviously Merle Boucher, House Minority Leader and Democrat Gubernatorial Candidate, has forgotten what the role of the governor is in Workforce Safety and Insurance. He pressed the Governor to fire the WSI board, even though the Governor has little to no authority over the WSI board. I would think a person that is a Democrat Party Leader would understand how WSI functions, being that is the only issue they talk about, wouldn’t you?

A very recent Democrat attack came lobbed from the Executive Director, Jamie Selzler. He shamefully accused Commissioner Hamm of raising rates on health insurance and of “re-hashing” their candidate’s ideas on how to address WSI. The fact is, just saying things should change is not a plan. Giving lip service to the problem will not make it go away. Republicans are finding real solutions to the problems of our state, they have been for years. Hamm made well defined proposals to give his department some oversight on WSI. The Democrats have offered nothing in terms of real plans.

Here in the Valley, Republicans are on the move, Republicans are ready to work.

Joe Miller, Deputy Director-Valley Region
Reach me at joe.miller@ndgop.org

Adam Hamm Makes It Official

2008-02-13T12:22:00.000-06:00

Today North Dakota Insurance Commissioner Adam Hamm formally announced he would seek a 4 year term for the office he currently holds. Joined by his fiancée Michelle and her 2 children, Hamm outlined his accomplishments and what he will focus on in the future.

“I traveled extensively during the open enrollment period for Medicare Part D helping seniors obtain assistance with their prescription drug coverage,” stated Hamm. “And, I am happy to report that earlier this week my department sent the final check to the city of Northwood to complete the nearly 8 million dollar agreement, allowing them to move forward with their plans for a new school.”

Hamm also spoke of his detailed proposal for Workforce Safety and Insurance that would allow the Insurance Department to play a specialized and necessary role in bringing long term accountability to that agency. (This proposal was outlined at press conferences in Fargo and Bismarck last week.)

Hamm pledged that he would continue to focus on consumer protection as his number one priority. “I will work hard over the next four years to ensure that North Dakotans have the protection and advocacy they deserve,” he said.

Hamm also promised to build on the Insurance Department’s success with the State Health Insurance Counseling program and Prescription Connection for North Dakota. “These programs have been extremely important in helping seniors and the disabled with insurance issues and with helping connect people with free or discounted prescription drugs directly from the manufacturer,” Hamm stated.

Lastly, Hamm pledged to take a leadership role on healthcare including: working to see appropriate reimbursements across the board; promoting personal wellness; and encouraging competition. “I’ll work to ensure good quality healthcare across all of North Dakota,” he said.

Hamm concluded his announcement by promising to never forget the lesson he learned growing up in North Dakota: “We can achieve anything with hard work and a commitment to each other”.

Correction Noted

2008-02-13T12:18:00.002-06:00

A very alert Dale Wetzel noted that there were actually about 9000 voters in the 2000 Republican Caucus. My sources were incorrect and I appreciate Dale setting me straight!

Gary Emineth, Chairman of the North Dakota Republican Party

Forum Perspective on GOP Caucuses Flawed, Ridiculous

2008-02-12T12:26:00.000-06:00

In a Feb. 7 editorial The Forum characterized Republicans as being lethargic, with nothing to smile about. Nothing could be further from the truth. There is a lot of energy and enthusiasm in Republican ranks; the numbers themselves speak volumes.

Another perspective on the caucus turnout is the Democrats had a poor turnout. If you compare the Democrats’ six hours versus Republican’s 90 minutes and 50 percent more polling places, they should have had 60,000 voters rather than 19,000.

Obviously that is a ridiculous comparison, just as The Forum’s perspective was ridiculous. A caucus is a meeting of party members to select delegates in a nominating process. State law provides for each party to determine their own rules for their caucus. Democrats had more of a primary caucus as opposed to the Republicans’ format with a rally and a shorter window for voting.

The voter turnout at the Republican caucus doubled the previous high in 2000. This caucus is the first competitive one for Republicans since its inception in 2000.

Now that Gov. Mitt Romney has stepped out of the ring, it’s a chance for Republicans across the state to regroup and get ready for round 2.

It’s obvious from the balanced support garnered by at least three of the four candidates, even folks out here in North Dakota, where change isn’t embraced quite as readily as it may be in larger population centers, are still asking to be heard.

Take Mike Huckabee’s 20 percent to Ron Paul’s 21 percent of the totals. Huckabee held his own against an admirable effort by Paul’s supporters. Paul’s strong views on such issues as personal liberty, less government and protection of the Constitution obviously resonate with many North Dakotans.

The Forum’s swipe at Huckabee with reference to his former occupation as a pastor, rather than commenting on his proven record as a governor of Arkansas for more than 10 years, incidentally from the same state as Bill Clinton, is a cheap shot. Huckabee was an effective administrator with integrity who has a consistent record of supporting conservative philosophies and values across the board. As a friend of mine said after he heard Huckabee articulate his strong moral values, “He sounds like he really believes it.” The last time I checked, his values are consistent with those held in high regard by a majority of Americans.

Paul made a visit to college campuses in Bismarck and Fargo. These were attended by more than 1,200 students and others. College Republican President Erik Nygren had this to say: “He (Paul) has the Young Republicans in North Dakota flying high. The Paul event was the largest CR event in history.” Bring it on!

As for Sen. John McCain, he is a solid candidate – a seasoned veteran in every way, unlike anyone on the Democratic side of the aisle in this contest, McCain will be ready to lead on day one. There will be no need for on-the-job training. McCain, while perceived as a maverick, has one of the highest conservative rankings in the Senate. He won’t be intimidated or buckle under to the likes of Iran, North Korea or even the liberal elements of the United Nations or U.S. Congress.

When the rallies and parades are over and the confetti is swept from the convention floors, two candidates – one Democrat and one Republican – will be left standing. In the end, the only vote that will matter is the general election. I’m willing to predict that Americans in North Dakota and across this country will fall in behind a man who has been in the trenches before and can lead us forward in the 21st century.

It’s the votes cast on general election day in November that matter now.

Gary Emineth, Chairman of the North Dakota Republican Party.

North Dakota is Right on Track

2008-02-08T11:45:00.000-06:00

The news of North Dakota’s growing population is just another indicator of the success the state is experiencing in work force and economic development. It is a pleasure to note that the growth is statewide and that a majority of the growth is made up of younger workers who are either returning home to North Dakota or coming to the state to pursue some of the many opportunities we have to offer.

The news, however, shouldn’t be surprising considering the number of studies that have placed North Dakota cities or the entire state in its top rankings of places to do business or live. Under Gov. John Hoeven’s leadership these last seven years, North Dakota has fostered a productive climate for businesses that has attracted a number of high-profile companies like Micro-soft and has helped our own homegrown businesses flourish. This business-friendly environment will only help bring in more lucrative career and job opportunities to the state. And, of course, with the high paying jobs, we’ll also be able to keep more of our young people stay in North Dakota to live, work and raise their families.

North Dakota’s booming economy is not the only indicator of this. A study done by the Beacon Hill Index ranks North Dakota fourth in its State Competitiveness Report, which attempts to identify the qualities that allow some areas to excel in income generation and thus compete economically, sustain a high level of per capita income and continue economic growth. The rankings are based on the state’s government and fiscal policies, security, infrastructure, human resources, technology, business incubation, openness and environmental policy. North Dakota ranks high in a majority of these categories, and in areas where there is room for improvement. Hoeven and his administration are already working hard to make North Dakota more competitive.

North Dakota has steadily risen in this report and with the continued efforts of the current administration, we can expect North Dakota to reach to top.

Dale Anderson
Fargo, N.D.

North Dakota Republican Presidential Caucus Results

2008-02-05T22:46:00.000-06:00

BISMARCK, ND – The North Dakota Republican Party announces the statewide results for the 2008 Presidential Preference Caucus:

Governor Mitt Romney 36%
Senator John McCain 23%
Ron Paul 21%
Governor Mike Huckabee 20%
Alan Keyes 0

9785 votes were cast

This means the following number of delegates goes to each candidate:

Governor Mitt Romney 8
Senator John McCain 5
Ron Paul 5
Governor Mike Huckabee 5

North Dakota has 26 delegates: 23 are pledged tonight, 3 will remain uncommitted. In order to receive any delegates, a candidate must have received at least 15% of the Caucus vote. Each candidate receives a proportional number of delegates based on the percentage of total votes received.

What choice do they have?

2008-02-04T15:12:00.000-06:00

The Democrat party has just come to face to face with reality, and they are scrambling. Their frightening reality is the specter of the Hillary train roaring down upon them and they are tied to the rails. This train has been coming for 8 years--it’s what they worked and wished for--and right on schedule and no surprise to anyone. The scramble to untie themselves from the track has taken frantic to near panic activity. The first of our tone-deaf representatives in Washington D.C. to cut the knots and abandon the Hillary Express is Senator Conrad who has put his stamp of approval on Barack Obama in an often run TV ad for Obama, and now he has authored a middle-page opinion piece in the Fargo Forum of Feb. 4. Conrad says Obama is best suited to unite our country and lead us to face these challenges. He tells us Obama is honest; it’s plain to see why Conrad would make that statement as a cloud of suspicion and indictments have hung over the Clintons, Hillary and Bill both, since their days in Arkansas.

On Feb. 1 Rep. Earl Pomeroy cut the bonds and jumped the tracks--he too came out for Obama saying that he has demonstrated rare capacity for leadership that you don’t often see…I am very excited about what he offers. The question to be asked is what is the “capacity for leadership” and what it is it that he “offers”? He is a 4 year senator--never has run anything, worked in public funded programs, and then sat in public paid offices. One has to ask the question, “Is this the man who may come face to face with the world’s most ruthless dictators to talk the hard talk of peace?” Is America to put its fate in the hands of a man with 4 years experience in the U.S. Senate--a shared responsibility with 99 others? A man with no accomplishments other than getting elected?

The Democrat party still harbors deep seated guilt over the bad behavior of president Clinton and Hillary in their 8 years in the White House. They know, too, it was 8 years wasted and squandered--a time when freedom could have been advanced, terrorism could have been checked, social programs could have been repaired--it was an opportunity for America. It was an opportunity lost and Conrad and Pomeroy know this.
The choice made by Conrad and Pomeroy was between the devil they know (Hillary) and the unknown who comes with no leadership record and possesses only oratory skills. They have picked oratory--a good talker. America deserves better!

Hal Neff Bismarck

Additional Predictions from Punxsutawney Phil

2008-02-02T09:50:00.000-06:00

Punxsutawney Phil saw his shadow and predicted that we will have six more weeks of winter. Phil has been unaware of the current state of the presidential race since he has been hibernating all winter. Upon learning that John McCain was now the Republican frontrunner with Mitt Romney nipping at his heals and Barack Hussein Obama was closing the gap on Mrs. Bill Clinton's lead, Phil made a few addtional predictions.

Bill Clinton will continue to put his foot in his mouth and draw attention to himself as oppose to his wife.
Barack Obama will adopt John Edward's campaign strategy and begin promising everything to everyone.
There will be a race between Clinton and Obama to see who can cut-and-run faster from the War on Terror.
Political pundits will continue to explain why things are occuring the way they are and try to explain how this really is what they thought would happen all along.
Hillary will realize her true calling and become a Flight Attendant.
Obama's campaign for change will become reality when he adopts the Salvation Army's kettle campaign strategy.
Not to be out done, Bill and Hillary go back to their roots and begin playing guitar and singing on street corners in San Francisco.
Obama turns down Ted Kennedy's invitation to drive his campaign bus.
Democrats begin a campaign to raise taxes believing it will help the economy
Republicans shed the Democratic attacks and mistruths, win in November.

Update on Ron Paul Events

2008-01-31T21:53:00.000-06:00

1. Rally at North Dakota State University
Grand Ballroom in the Student Union
Fargo, North Dakota
Monday, February 4th, 1:00 pm. (Media availability 1:45-2:00pm)

2. Rally at the Elks Lodge
900 S. Washington St.Bismarck, ND 58504
Monday, February 4th, 3:30 pm. (Media availability 4:15-4:40pm)

"The Fargo Republican" gives an opinion on ND owned refinery

2008-01-31T12:42:00.000-06:00

Read what "The Fargo Republican" has to say!: http://fargorepublican.blogspot.com/2008/01/lets-talk-nd-owned-oil-refineries.html

Ron Paul to visit Bismarck and Fargo

2008-01-29T22:06:00.001-06:00

Ron Paul will be the second Presidential Candidate to visit North Dakota this year. You can see him at Bismarck State College at 9 am or in Fargo at 12:00 Noon at a location yet to be announced.

FISA Fight Continues

2008-01-28T11:56:00.000-06:00

One week from today, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) will expire unless Congress passes a new version that President Bush is willing to sign. If it expires, our intelligence gatherers here and abroad will be rendered blind and deaf because the legality of their operations will be put in limbo.

As CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden said, terrorists are in a Darwinian era: we’re only capturing the dumb ones. If we’re going to catch the smart ones -- and thwart their plans -- we need more and better intelligence. Why, then, are the Democrats insisting on hobbling intelligence gathering by insisting on a more restrictive FISA?

FISA -- which dates back to the Carter administration -- is a law that is supposed to govern how intelligence agencies collect data on foreign agents in the United States. Though the President has Constitutional authority to do this outside of the framework of FISA, President Bush chose last year to submit the National Security Agency’s terrorist surveillance program to FISA limitations when the existence of the highly classified program was leaked to and published by the New York Times.

Last May, the FISA court issued a secret decision that imposed new limitations on gathering foreign intelligence that caused a crisis for NSA, CIA and the other intelligence agencies. In one reported incident, the new restrictions caused a nine-hour delay in gathering intelligence essential to an ongoing combat mission to rescue three kidnapped American soldiers in Iraq.

As a result of the FISA court’s action, the Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Mike McConnell, came to the Senate Intelligence committee leaders -- Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Christopher Bond (R-Mo) -- in June and asked for urgent action to remedy the problem.
Congress procrastinated until the eve of the August recess when -- despite the outcries of the liberal media (the New York Times, again, and others) -- it passed a fix to the problem with a six-month sunset provision built in. Democrats were forced to accept the short-term extension because they wouldn’t agree to a provision that would give telecommunications companies immunity from civil lawsuits based on their good-faith cooperation with the government.

With the expiration date closing in, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) finally began floor action on the FISA bill. But he and the other liberals are trying to wheedle another short-term extension without the telecom immunity the intelligence community wants and needs. Both McConnells -- Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) and Director of National Intelligence Adm. Mike McConnell -- have rejected the idea. Reid, as of last night, seemed ready to play that game out all too long.

Reid's inability to get agreement among the Dems he supposedly leads frustrated the entire Senate last night. First, Reid threatened that FISA would be allowed to expire, trying desperately to get a short-term extension. When Minority Leader McConnell blocked the move and filed a cloture motion, Reid was forced to schedule the vote on cloture for Monday afternoon.
Earlier this week, Sen. Bond told me in an interview that, “Congress has had six months to act. To stall legislation needed to help our intelligence community prevent attacks and protect American lives is not only irresponsible, it’s dangerous.” He added, “Failure to act could leave our country deaf and dumb, handcuffing our intelligence operators who are fighting to protect American families in the war against Islamic extremism.”

The fate of the Senate bill may depend on the New York Times editorial page.
Reid usually defers to the Times’ judgment. In an August 3 press conference, as the Senate was about to pass the FISA revision, Reid was asked if he thought the Bush administration was stampeding Congress into acting too quickly, Reid literally pulled that day’s lead New York Times editorial on the subject (titled, “Stampeding Congress Again”) and displayed it to the television cameras saying, “Here’s my answer.” Yesterday’s Senate votes were conducted without that sort of guidance. If the New York Times comes out against the bill again this morning, Reid will probably follow its orders.

The House bill would be a disaster for intelligence agencies. It would -- for the first time in American history -- impose a requirement to obtain a FISA court warrant to intercept communications of persons reasonably believed to be overseas. And (in another blatantly unconstitutional provision) military intelligence gathering would be subjected to FISA court proceedings.

Think about that. Put yourself in the boots of a SEAL platoon leader trying to determine if you’re walking into an al-Queda ambush. You probably need -- right now, not ten hours from now -- intelligence about a bunch of guys sitting two kilometers over some hill in Afghanistan. If any of them may be in contact with anyone in the United States, you have to get a warrant from the FISA court to listen in on his cell phone.

It all boils down to this: the House bill will cause the deaths of Americans on the battlefield. When the Senate bill passes -- which is likely Monday afternoon -- the House will be left with less than a week to conference its bill with the Senate and agree to a version that the president will sign.

President Bush has indicated he will veto a bill that doesn’t include the telecom immunity provision. Other aspects of the House bill will also result in a veto. And if the law expires, much of our intelligence gathering -- essential to saving American lives, and not only in combat -- will stop.

Will the Democrats be so cavalier with American lives? Read the next few days of the New York Times editorials for the answer.
- Jed Babbin, Human Events Editor

Where's your refund?

2008-01-28T10:21:00.000-06:00

Because of the Congress' late fix to the alternative minimum tax, millions of Americans will have to wait for their income tax refund this year. Here is one reason why:

Last December we witnessed a rare event as Charles Schumer, Democrat Senator from New York and Charlie Rangel, Democrat Representative from New York both actively supported the discontinuance of the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Hard to believe that two Tax and Spend Democrats would want to cut a tax, especially dyed-in- the- wool taxers like these two.

A little background on the AMT: during the 1960’s a few wealthy people were able to avoid paying any federal income tax due to high allowable deductions; this was unacceptable to Democrats so Congress in 1969 passed the AMT to extract a tax payment from the “wealthy.” Over the years this tax went on auto-pilot and had no indexing for inflation; gradually more and more people got caught in this AMT that was meant for rich people.

However, there’s always a however, New York City is one of the high income parts of the country and as incomes rose since the 60’s, the AMT began to catch more and more of these “wealthy” people. The past couple of years thousands of not-so-wealthy people got caught up in AMT and taxpayer unrest began to mount. Interestingly, it didn’t really bother congress one bit, they happily spent the money. That’s when Schumer and Rangel started to get serious heat from their voters in New York City--voters, good Democrats who like tax and spend policies, suddenly found themselves paying federal taxes under AMT, and they did not like it.

When it comes to taxes versus votes there is no contest in the analysis of Schumer and Rangel. Taxes that cost them votes are clearly unfair; the taxes must go. As we saw this past December, the two Charlies played Santa Claus. Their voters got a package containing an AMT “free pass.”
Hal Neff Bismarck

Housing news from CNNMoney.com

2008-01-27T21:40:00.000-06:00

Bismarck, N.D.

Key stat: Over the past 12 months, the median home price in Bismarck jumped 15.3%, to lead the nation.

It was a big gain, according to the National Association of Realtors, but it brought the median house price there to only $161,600. No high-priced markets grew nearly as fast. Among high-priced cities, the San Jose, Calif. metro area, where the median price rose to $852,500, recorded the highest percentage increase at 9.4%.

Get Involved

2008-01-18T14:37:00.000-06:00

I have had the opportunity to hear Governor John Hoeven speak twice in the past 5 days and each time I was impressed by his passion for our great state of North Dakota. He spoke from the heart, with no notes, and stressed the importance of becoming involved in the political process.

As you're reading this, you are probably thinking: "I'm already involved", and you would be right, to a point. Being involved can mean a lot of things:

- Get informed: reading blogs, magazine articles or candidate profiles, watching the news
- Volunteer: stuff envelopes for campaigns, make phone calls, go door to door
- Talk to people: reach out to those who are independent or undecided and point them toward sources where they can find the truth. Write a letter to the editor or call a radio talk show.

These are just a few ideas I came up with and I'm sure you can think of more. As the Presidential Caucus draws near, I challenge each of you to bring a friend that wasn't planning on participating. Show them how much fun and educational the political process can be.

As Governor Hoeven said last night, "Those that participate make the difference."

- Deb Seminary, Communications Director

The Democrats' Fairy Tale

2008-01-14T21:39:00.000-06:00

From The New York Times
By William Kristol
Op-Ed
January 14, 2008

[O]bama has been pretty consistent in his opposition to the war. But ... Obama's view of the current situation in Iraq is out of touch with reality. In this, however, Obama is at one with Hillary Clinton and the entire leadership of the Democratic Party.

When President Bush announced the surge of troops ... Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Democratic Congressional leaders predicted failure. Obama ... told Larry King that he didn't believe additional U.S. troops would "make a significant dent in the sectarian violence that's taking place there." Then in April, the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, asserted that "this war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything." In September, Clinton told Gen. David Petraeus that his claims of progress in Iraq required a "willing suspension of disbelief."

The Democrats were wrong in their assessments of the surge. Attacks per week on American troops are now down about 60 percent from June. Civilian deaths are down approximately 75 percent from a year ago. December 2007 saw the second-lowest number of U.S. troops killed in action since March 2003. ...

Do Obama and Clinton and Reid now acknowledge that they were wrong? Are they willing to say the surge worked?

No. ... When asked recently whether she stood behind her "willing suspension of disbelief" insult to General Petraeus, Clinton said, "That's right."

When Obama was asked in the most recent Democratic presidential debate, "Would you have seen this kind of greater security in Iraq if we had followed your recommendations to pull the troops out last year?" he didn't directly address the question. But he volunteered that ... "We should start negotiating now." ...

Last year's success ... was made possible by confidence among Iraqis that U.S. troops would stay and help protect them ... [W]e have been able to turn around the situation in Iraq. ...

Yesterday, on "Meet the Press," Hillary Clinton claimed that the Iraqis are changing their ways in part because of the Democratic candidates' "commitment to begin withdrawing our troops in January of 2009." So the Democratic Party, having proclaimed that the war is lost and having sought to withdraw U.S. troops, deserves credit for any progress that may have been achieved in Iraq.

That is truly a fairy tale. ...
To View The Entire Article, Please Visit: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/14/opinion/14kristol.html?hp

Your Tax Dollars at Work

2008-01-14T21:34:00.000-06:00

Roads? Bridges? No, not this time. Take a look at the January 11, 2008 issue of the Bismarck Tribune page 8A lower half. “WOPILA, Our Gratitude” with a nice photo of Senator Byron Dorgan, and beside it a smaller photo of Senator Dorgan with UTTC President David Gipp and an unidentified Indian woman in full costume. The purpose of the ad paid for by United Tribes Technical College is a message of profuse thanks for the funding secured by Dorgan for the UTTC. The glowing praise for Dorgan could not be more effusive had it been written by Dorgan’s staff for a political poster. This UTTC paid-for ad is a letter from David Gipp, President of UTTC to Dorgan thanking him for the money and citing him for his accomplishment on behalf of the Tribal people.

This is an abuse of tax money and an outrage! Where does one begin? Let’s start with the use of federal tax dollars to pay for a political ad. There is nothing in this ad that requires it be run as a paid-for public letter or notice. This letter, if it needed to written at all, should have been on one page of letter stationery, signed by Gipp, posted with a 41 cent stamp and sent to Dorgan. Instead the taxpayers paid what? Possibly one thousand seven hundred dollars (per the Tribune). $1700 versus 41 cents.

A second concern and yet more serious. This ad has all the looks of political advocacy for a particular person--a paid political promotion-- for the benefit of Senator Dorgan. It was paid for by UTTC, directly or indirectly, with tax dollars received through a grant obtained by Senator Dorgan. The statement in the letter is very clear about the reason. This is a nice way to pay back a favor--you get some money for us--we’ll run a nice ad giving you all the credit--out of gratitude you will get lots of votes. All paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.

The good senator will protest that he did not solicit this ad. He may well be insulated from the actions that put it into print, but it stretches belief that Pres. Gipp did this as a “surprise” without the knowledge of the Senator or his staff. It will be interesting to hear the Senator’s explanation.

Hal Neff

Democrat donations worth another look

2008-01-08T12:16:00.000-06:00

I recently took the opportunity to challenge my Democrat counterparts over the
embarrassing revelation that they had solicited and received $10,000 last year from controversial Mississippi trial lawyer Richard “Dickie” Scruggs.

Scruggs is one of the big-money, out-of-state contributors that
bankroll the operations of North Dakota’s Democrats. Scruggs has made hundreds of millions of dollars for himself suing American businessmen and women. But Mr. Scruggs’ run of legal success seems to be screeching to a halt.

He now stands accused of judicial bribery. In fact, just weeks ago the FBI raided the offices of the law firm hired to defend him.

Most politicians are now fleeing Scruggs faster than a North Dakota Pronghorn Antelope. In fact, Bill and Hillary Clinton cancelled a fundraiser recently set for Scruggs’ home.

My own suggestion, was North Dakota Democrats consider donating their Scruggs’ money to a worthy charity.

But what is most remarkable about this episode is not that the North Dakota Democrat Party received money from someone like Dickie Scruggs. To be
fair, something embarrassing can happen to a contributor to any party or candidate, though most would have the good sense to return the money ASAP. What is remarkable is the pattern of fundraising abuses that seem to plague North Dakota Democrats.

It is this pattern of behavior that should concern North Dakotans. Something is seriously wrong with how North Dakota Democrats have come to operate in the
field of political fundraising. Consider the growing list of Democrat finance fiascos:

In 2006, the North Dakota Democrat Party forfeited $44,000 in illegal corporate
contributions after being roundly criticized for flouting the state’s campaign finance laws.

In 2005, Democrat US Senator Byron Dorgan became ensnared in the Jack Abramoff influence peddling scandal. Dorgan was pressured to return $67,000
dollars in Abramoff-tainted contributions. As reported by the Associated Press, the issue was intertwined with his 2003 involvement with a
Massachusetts Indian Tribe seeking federal recognition, and a 2001 fundraiser he hosted in a sports arena skybox with Abramoff ties.

But it does not stop there. An analysis of the North Dakota Democrats most recent year end finance report reveals a list of bizarre fundraising choices: $10,000 from a New Jersey rice trader who was deeply involved with disgraced former US Senator Robert Torricelli.

$10,000 over the last two election cycles from a political action committee organized to advance “bisexual rights,” among other things. $10,000 from the head of the Clinton-cozy satellite company that was forced to pay $14 million in fines for passing sensitive missile technology to communist China. $10,000 from a liberal Hollywood insider, received on election day.

Well over $100,000 from asbestos trial lawyers around the country.

In light of all this, it pays to remember that the current North Dakota Democrat Party Chairman, David Strauss, played a key role in a major
national scandal. Strauss was Al Gore’s deputy chief of staff who helped arrange and later attended the now infamous Buddhist Temple Fundraiser. It would appear the experience did little to chasten Mr. Strauss’ fundraising ethic.

Any objective review of campaign finance records on file with the Secretary of State’s office would conclude that the state’s Democrats have become a subsidiary of some very questionable out-of-state interests. By comparison, North Dakota Republicans tend to be funded to a greater extent by smaller, North Dakota donors.

From Scruggs to Strauss, Dorgan to Abramoff, bisexual rights activists to asbestos litigators, the story of the North Dakota Democrats and their
reckless fundraising is an ongoing saga. As we enter another election year these are things worthy of voters’ consideration. On one hand, you will have Republican candidates supported mainly by actual North Dakotans. On the Democrat side, candidates will be brought to you largely by a collection of big money donors who neither live here, nor share our values.

The difference could not be more stark.
- Gary Emineth, State Chairman

New Hampshire Predictions from the Evans-Novak Political Report

2008-01-08T08:07:00.000-06:00

New Hampshire Predictions: Obama Blowout; Romney Rallying

McCain had seemed a clear winner over Romney in New Hampshire with two days left before the Republican voting, but Romney is coming back fast.Obama looks like a winner over Clinton in Tuesday's New Hampshire primary, which will be damaging but not fatal to her Democratic presidential candidacy.Here is our New Hampshire outlook based on a personal reporting trip by Robert Novak:

Republican
Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) had pulled even with front-running former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney prior to the Iowa caucuses and pulled ahead based on Romney's disappointing second-place finish in Iowa.

After Saturday night's ABC debate, Romney, from neighboring Massachusetts, seemed to be in freefall. The other candidates personally dislike him, and they ganged up on him. The only problem for McCain appeared to be that he overplayed his hand in going after Romney with too much vehemence and personal animosity.

But Romney made a remarkable comeback in Sunday night's Fox News debate, dominating his opponents. He capitalized on McCain's weaknesses on tax and immigration policy. We attended a focus group of mainly undecided Republican voters arranged for Fox by pollster Frank Luntz. They entered the room before the debate widely divided and left it after the debate heavily for Romney -- because of the immigration issue.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee never was expected to repeat his Iowa win in the less fertile soil of New Hampshire, but his performance in the Fox debate was truly dreadful. The Luntz focus group hated Huckabee's refusal to answer questions about his record.

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was not long ago battling Romney for the New Hampshire lead, but he abandoned the state a few weeks back as part of his "big-state" strategy and over the past weekend did little there except participate in the debates. Like McCain, he suffers because of the immigration issue.

If McCain does win in New Hampshire, he will be the new national frontrunner. Romney may be finished, with Giuliani given the best chance of overcoming McCain.

Our shaky New Hampshire projection on election eve:
1st Place: McCain, but vulnerable.2nd Place: Romney, but rallying.3rd Place: Huckabee.4th Place: Giuliani.5th Place: Former Sen. Fred Thompson (Tenn.).

Democratic

The third-place finish in Iowa by Sen. Hillary Clinton (N.Y.) had a negative impact in New Hampshire, where she had been slipping against Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) even before her loss in Iowa. It is beginning to look like a double-digit loss for Clinton.

She was supposed to come out swinging against Obama in New Hampshire, but her boring, pedantic campaign style had not really changed from Iowa. At one rally where we were present, Clinton never mentioned Obama by name and criticized him only once (on healthcare) as "one of my opponents." Former President Bill Clinton, campaigning separately, is sprightlier but no more effective.

In contrast, "Obamamania" reigns supreme -- generating enthusiasm not seen since the 1968 campaign of Robert F. Kennedy. He attracts new voters and generates support across ideological and party lines. In truth, he worries Republicans sick, but for now, he threatens the long, slowly built Clinton campaign.
Former Sen. John Edwards (N.C.), who dwells on finishing ahead of Clinton in Iowa, looks like the odd man out in New Hampshire, with very little interest in him.
Clinton will not drop out after New Hampshire, as has been reported, and she can still stop Obama in the big states. But it will not be easy or automatic.

Our election eve projection for New Hampshire:
1st Place: Obama, going away.2nd Place: Clinton.3rd Place: Edwards.4th Place: New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson

To The National Geographic: regarding the January 2008 article: The Emptied Prairie.

2008-01-04T20:13:00.000-06:00

Many of us are disaapointed at the January issue of the National Geographic Magazine article" The Emptied Prairie" showing North Dakota in a series of abandoned farm buildings, schools and cars languishing in an empty, snowy grassland. The article was written by Charles Bowden and there is no way of knowing what objective or agenda he had in mind, but it is clearly single-minded in its theme--this part of the country is dying--no, it's already dead. I sent the following comment to NG at their e-mail address: ngsforum@nationalgeographic.com.

The Emptied Prairie piece in the National Geographic of Jan. 2008 hits one mark and misses so many others--yes, there are lots of ghosts here--farms, small towns, immigrants, and people who passed through. Is our landscape open and nearly devoid of man's work? Yes, some of it is. The stories you missed are those of thousands of immigrants who came here from an oppressed Europe at the turn of the 19th to the 20th century. Some of the poorest of the poor from middle-Europe, Ukraine, Norway and Sweden, all seeking a chance for a better life, not necessarily for themselves, but for their sons and daughters some not yet born. Not told in your story was the success that came out of the first generation's struggle. Their sons and daughters not only survived and prospered, but they became educated and moved into the so-called American Dream--vindicating the hardship and fulfilling the dreams of their grandparents. I am one of those. I've lived and worked in a dozen of our great states, and I have chosen to live here. I am home. The photography of The Emptied Prairie is superb, but you missed the real story.
Hal Neff Bismarck, ND

Summarizing the 2007 Congress

2007-12-31T11:44:00.000-06:00

We are now at the end of 2007 and the results are in--on record, that is, and the record is dismal for the “New Democrat Congress”. Most of the year was frittered away at impotent and useless attempts at legislation that would deny funding to our military efforts in Iraq, and as a result make a difficult situation worse. Make the situation so bad, in fact, that President Bush would have to pull the troops out and abandon Iraq; a complete and utter failure-- the ultimate embarrassment to President Bush and the Republicans.

The Congressional Democrats failed--it didn’t work. Thanks to President Bush, and his commitment to the people of Iraq and the American ideal of freedom, a new plan and renewed effort called the “surge” is now bringing significant success and hope to millions of people. Even as late as September congress called hearings to further question our leaders in Iraq and try to convince the American people that Iraq was a lost cause. It was at this time that the Democrats and the Left Wing of their party slimed General Petraeus by calling him “General Betrayus” in a paid advertisement in the New York Times newspaper.

Even as the Democrats in congress were brow-beating General Petraeus, the news coming from Iraq was showing positive results that the surge was working. The Iraqi people, both Sunni and Shia, were fed up with the terrorists and were turning to the American military and aiding them in the fight against al Qaeda. The tide had already started to turn in August: violence and killing dropped in September and October; November and December brought continuing improvements and much of the civil life of Iraq is returning to pre-war activities.

The Congress of 2007 revealed the true colors of the Democrat Party that wants to run the country. In less than a year we have seen their weak-kneed support of Freedom. We have seen their disdain for our Armed Forces. We have heard their apologies for America. In the election year 2008 the voters of America will have the chance to tell the Democrats and their radical Left-Wing that we have had enough of them. Our country needs leaders who believe in America and will stand up for Freedom. A Free World depends upon American leadership.
- Hal Neff, Bismarck

Holiday Greetings from State Headquarters

2007-12-21T10:36:00.000-06:00

Sitting down to enjoy a rare moment of quiet, my thoughts turned to recent happenings in my short tenure as your party chairman. Let me begin by saying, these last few months have been challenging, educational, and very rewarding. I have concluded that North Dakota’s most valuable resource is her people—people like you who help to make this a great place to live, work, worship and play!

A few highlights as the year 2007 passes into deep winter:
1) Governor Hoeven has announced his candidacy for Governor in the fall. With his enormous popularity and track record of substantial achievement across the board—in business opportunity, energy development and agricultural innovation—we have a tried and true leader at the top of a great ticket for the fall election.
2) The slate of candidates for state office and the legislative seats continues to surprise and delight. From Adam Hamm as Insurance Commissioner to those vying for the open seat on the PSC, and numerous individuals across the state with outstanding potential to enhance the legislature, I can hardly wait for the outcome.
3) With the visit of Presidential hopeful Rudy Guiliani last month followed by the Republican National Chairman, Mike Duncan, it looks as though the Presidential race will continue to be interesting. This gives many of you a rare opportunity to be involved at a national level, if you so choose.
4) The meetings held for the District Chairs in Fargo, Grand Forks, Minot, and Bismarck were very well attended. As Executive Director Mike Schatz and I presented material to enable the leaders to carefully plan and effectively finance the upcoming campaigns at the District level, we were very impressed with the level of interest and commitment from these outstanding Republicans.
5) I have been very encouraged by the response to the campaign to raise funds for the “300 in 300” initiative. We have launched a program to send personal notes from District Chairs to potential donors each month. Because of the cooperation of local leaders and the great staff here at headquarters, we have seen a very positive early response.

I would like to close by saying that these last few months have given me hope—hope that excites and motivates me to move into the New Year with energy and enthusiasm for the 2008 election cycle. America is the world’s best hope, because America is made up of people like you. Thank you for the privilege of leading the way into a successful year! Best Wishes for a Merry Christmas and a New Year full of Hope! Gary Emineth Chairman

Speaker Pelosi Refuses to Protect the Salvation Army - - Even at Christmas

2007-12-17T13:01:00.000-06:00

For me and, I suspect, many of you, Christmas time is synonymous with the Salvation Army -- those volunteers in Santa hats ringing bells for donations in red kettles. The many Americans who give and the many Americans who are helped every year during the holiday season are, for me, what the Salvation Army is all about.
Which is why it is so unbelievable to me that, as I write this, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) continues to refuse to protect the Salvation Army from being sued by the United States government for requiring its employees to speak English on the job.
In an attempt to appease anti-English radicals in the House, Speaker Pelosi is holding up a bill that would protect employers such as the Salvation Army for being harassed by the government for simply requiring that they employees speak our common language. You can read my past commentaries on this issue here and here.
So, on behalf of the majority of Americans who want to see the English language encouraged and protected as our common language, my message to Speaker Pelosi is this: "'Tis the season, Madame Speaker. Give the gift that keeps on giving. Protect American charities from being sued for requiring that their employees speak English on the job."
Your friend,
Newt Gingrich

C'mon, give the money to someone who really needs it!

2007-12-17T12:59:00.000-06:00

State Republican Party Chairman Gary Emineth would like the North Dakota Democratic Party to donate a $10,000 contribution linked to Richard ‘Dickie’ Scruggs, who has been indicted in a judge bribery plot.

“We continue to see the Democrats accepting money from questionable sources to fund their statewide operations.” said Emineth. “What exactly did Scruggs get from our Congressional Delegation for that $10,000? Someone had to ask for that donation, so something must have been promised for it.”

Scruggs is a Mississippi trial lawyer who has reportedly made almost $850 million from tobacco and asbestos litigation. He now stands accused of judicial bribery stemming from litigation involving Hurricane Katrina insurance payouts. On Monday of this week, the FBI raided the law office of attorneys hired to defend Scruggs.

Even Hillary Clinton does not want to be associated with Scruggs. Her campaign has cancelled a fundraiser scheduled in Scruggs home December 15th. “If Scruggs’ money is too dirty for even the Clintons, it should be too dirty for our state,” stated Emineth.

Records on file with the ND Secretary of State’s office document that Scruggs donated $10,000 to the ND Democratic-NPL Party on October 26th, 2006.

Emineth would like to see the ND Democrats donate the $10,000 to charity. “In the spirit of Christmas I think that $10,000 would do a lot of good for several non-profit organizations in North Dakota.”

Dems don't want success in Iraq

2007-12-11T14:49:00.000-06:00

By Brent McCarthy

The biased liberal media will not report the success of the troop surge. Our troops have the terrorists on the run. This is not good news for Democrats who were banking on the defeat of our troops to put their candidate in the White House. The push is on to bring about the defeat of our troops before the election, the gloves are off, and they want to cut off funding.
Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-ND, (after condemning Limbaugh for defending our troops) is now leading the charge for defeat. He wants “redeployment.” Just like “comprehensive immigration reform” is a code for “amnesty,” “redeployment” is a code for “surrender.” Our troops don’t need to go anywhere else to fight terrorists, there are plenty in Iraq and more arrive daily.
Our troops were sent reinforcements, it turned the tide. There is safety in numbers so troop casualties are down. The sad truth is that Democrats want troop numbers reduced so that the media will be reporting increased troop casualties by election season. This is what they desperately want when they say they want to “reduce troop levels in Iraq.” It’s not about money. Compared to what we spend on entitlements, the cost of the war is pennies.
We know that many in the most self absorbed generation will never understand. This is after all the generation that was so scared of its own shadow that it caused the defeated of our brave troops in Vietnam from home and then spit on them when they returned. When the men and women in Iraq today signed up for the military, they knew what was going on. They watch the news. They knew they would end up over there. They were not drafted. They believe in the cause. Unlike its predecessor, this is a brave and noble generation. Let’s tip our hats to them, give credit where credit is due and give them the funding and support they deserve.
Contact Byron Dorgan today and tell him that we support our troops, and expect him to set aside the needs of his party and start supporting them also.

State Representative Vig should be more informed

2007-12-07T12:09:00.000-06:00

By Susan Shearer, Harvey, ND / Letter to the Jamestown Sun

As a state representative, Benjamin Vig should be more informed of the actions the North Dakota state government is taking to help address rising fuel prices within our state. While the biggest factor in fuel prices is the national and world oil markets, Gov. John Hoeven and his administration have done everything in their power to bring relief to North Dakota consumers.
For example, it was not long ago that Hoeven pushed for and received a waiver from the Environmental Protection Agency to allow importation of Canadian winter blended fuel earlier than normal to address the fuel shortage, and he waived the hours of service for truck drivers hauling fuel into the state to help keep prices down. Above all, he has remained in continuous contact with regional refineries and pipeline authorities to insist that more fuel is shipped to our state and that fuel prices are kept at a more reasonable level.
His work in the energy sector, however, does not stop there. He recently chaired an Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission meeting, which was held in September to address these and other issues throughout the Rocky Mountain and Upper Great Plains regions.
Vig also ignores all the work the governor has done to promote alternative fuels, which help to bring down prices and promote less reliance on foreign oil. A few years ago, North Dakota produced less than 40 million gallons of ethanol a year. Under the Governor’s leadership, new facilities already operating and other plants that are now being planned and constructed will produce a half a billion gallons.
All of this was ignored in Vig’s recent letter, however, making it seem as though he is more interested in erroneously pointing fingers when his time as a state legislator could be better spent working with North Dakota’s leaders to help tackle such issues and expand North Dakota’s energy capabilities.
(Shearer is president of Harvey Sand & Gravel Inc.)

In case you missed it... ND Bucks Economic Head Wind

2007-12-06T08:17:00.000-06:00

Forum Editorial:
North Dakota’s economy is thriving in the face of an economic downturn across the Midwest. That’s the good news from Creighton University’s Mid-America Economic Survey, one of the more reliable and credible economic assessments of the nine-state region.
Professor Ernie Goss of Creighton said the region’s overall economic signs are not unlike those that preceded a recession in 2001. His Business Conditions Index for November dropped below neutral 50 to no-growth 49.1, the first sub-50 reading since 2002.
But North Dakota bucked the trend with a remarkable 71, a jump from October’s 69.3. North Dakota’s index was the strongest in the surveyed region, and Goss attributed the state’s strong economy to the Canadian dollar (shoppers coming south), a great year on the farm and continued expansion of the energy sector.
The news from the Creighton survey comes just days after an excellent post-Thanksgiving shopping weekend in North Dakota’s major cities. The pace of shopping has not slipped, despite a few days of bad weather and record-high gasoline prices. When holiday shoppers come out and spend, it means they have disposable income and are anticipating the good economy will last. Consumer confidence confirms the Creighton findings.
Other factors contributing to the economic strength in North Dakota include job growth and export sales. The state has added some 3,300 good-paying manufacturing jobs in the past few years. The state’s ranking for exports and export businesses jumped last year, as entrepreneurs took advantage of state support to find and exploit new overseas markets.
Among the “head winds” that are slowing the national and regional economies is the subprime mortgage lending debacle. Again, North Dakota bucked the trend by not jumping on to the subprime bandwagon. Banks with state roots and home-grown bankers exercised traditional caution and did not get sucked into the storm that is buffeting the national economy. Free of that negative factor, the state’s increasingly diversified economy continues to thrive.
Today’s issue:
Regional survey finds North Dakota economy is in excellent shape.
Our position:
Diversification will help state weather a looming national downturn.
Forum editorials represent the opinion of Forum management and the newspaper’s Editorial Board.

Mathern Spending Plans

2007-12-03T22:02:00.000-06:00

North Dakota state senator Tim Mathern has announced his bid for the Democrat Party nomination for governor. Mathern is an incumbent senator from Fargo who many of you will recall, in the legislative session of 2007, co-sponsored the ND Senate Concurrent Resolution 4022: the purpose of this resolution was to have the North Dakota legislature direct President George W. Bush to immediately pull the U.S. troops out of Iraq. Mathern sponsored that resolution at the very time that the U.S. military was planning remedial action in Iraq. The surge, as it was called, has proven to be so effective that less than 8 months later Iraq and Baghdad are returning to peaceful commerce.
In a Nov. 30 interview with Mr. John Irby, editor at the Bismarck Tribune, Mathern proposes, as a centerpiece of his campaign, state paid health care for all North Dakota children--no matter the income, no qualifications or restrictions. There were no questions asked about who or how this would be paid for, and Mathern offered no details.
The 2008 election is nearly a year away, and the next legislative session is to begin in 2009. There is great anticipation of a “nice” budget surplus awaiting the next legislative session--Mathern has already begun to spend it.
Hal Neff

War critics silent

2007-11-29T14:38:00.000-06:00

Silence. That’s all you hear. Silence.
You would have thought by now that they would have the maturity to admit it. But no, they still remain silent. Hoping, I suppose, that no one would notice. Well, I have.
I just thought that I would remind the people of North Dakota of the fact that not too long ago some people in our state would have us believe we were losing in Iraq. And that we should cut our losses and “redeploy.” Well, where are those people now? Hiding in the corners right where they should be, that’s where.
Newspapers all over the country are trumpeting the news that our brave American servicemen and servicewomen are winning the war in Iraq. Al-Qaeda has abandoned Baghdad, former residents there are returning home and businesses once attacked by the insurgents are reopening. They feel safe again.
One would think that those who opposed the troop surge in the first place would breathe a sigh of relief and celebrate with us at this great victory. But no, silence.
I have to wonder where are the congratulatory remarks to our military commanders from those who opposed the surge in the first place? Where are the press releases from ranking government officials stating that while they were honest in their opposition to the surge at first, they now are happy that it in fact did work? Where are they?
No. We are not really surprised at their silence. But we will remember. We will remember those who honestly disagreed with a policy decision yet failed to rejoice in the victory. Let there be no doubt.
- Jeff Langley

North Dakota on the right track

2007-11-29T14:33:00.000-06:00

In a recent letter (Nov. 15), Brad Mills condemned the progress that our state is making, once again reiterating that Mills and other Democrats would rather see North Dakota in the despondency of the late 1980s than admit that North Dakota is on the right track. It seems they would rather replace the partisan barriers that hinder this state’s continued growth than work together to move this state forward.
He and many other critics ignore the fact that this state is indeed making great headway. We are coming out of those stagnant years of the 1980s as evidenced by North Dakota’s economic growth. In fact, under Gov. John Hoeven’s leadership, the state’s economy has grown
50 percent, or nearly $1 billion a year, since 2000. Incomes and wages in the state continue to increase faster than the national average, and a record $120 million tax relief package will help North Dakotans to keep more of their hard-earned paychecks. This past session, a cap was also placed on tuition increases to help slow that trend.
As the state progresses, our smaller communities are also seeing the positive effects as both the traditional and renewable energy industries develop in our rural areas. In addition, renewable energy ventures are offering North Dakota’s farmers more value-added agriculture opportunities than ever before.
As long as a majority of North Dakotans don’t contract the negative, partisan attitude that the Democrats are continuously trying to spread, this state’s future holds numerous possibilities for an even more prosperous future, much of which is thanks to the groundwork laid by Gov. Hoeven’s administration.
- Jim Strege, from The Forum

No recess for the Senate

2007-11-26T15:08:00.000-06:00

This past week Americans watched the U.S. senate in action, or to be more accurate, the U.S. Senate "inaction". There on national TV news was our very own Senator Byron Dorgan, D-North Dakota presiding over the U.S. Senate as he called the session to order. That was easy enough since there were no other Senators present in the chamber and there was no business to conduct; hence, Dorgan declared the senate adjourned for the day. The whole thing took all of five minutes. This same procedure was replicated several days in a row over the Thanksgiving Holiday week with the express purpose to keep the senate in-session so President Bush could not make any appointments to federal offices--all of this the brain-child of Senate leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada.
This whole thing looks so childish, and coming from a legislative body of 100 grown-ups. Then, again, maybe this week of "sham sessions" produced some of the senate's finest work of the entire year. Another reason to be thankful.
- Hal Neff

North Dakota Short of Energy?

2007-11-26T11:42:00.000-06:00

As reported in the news Senator Dorgan, D-ND chaired a hearing November 20 at Bismarck of the Senate Sub-committee on Energy and Water Development; purpose of the hearing was to delve into the recent shortages of gas and diesel motor fuels, and the resultant high prices, in North Dakota since late summer. Written and oral testimony was received by the senator from six representatives of the industry who spoke for retailers, distributors, refiners, and pipelines plus the Deputy Administrator of the Energy Administration. Questions by the senator were directed at all of the panel asking to how the severe shortage of gasoline and diesel fuel developed and why it seemed to affect North Dakota more than any other area.
The testimony revealed that a combination of events came together--a rain/flood in Kansas, a refinery down for planned upgrades, and essential maintenance of others created a shortage of product in the central area. Capacity is coming on line and the situation is easing, but supplies of gasoline are still tight and diesel is very tight. Winter grade diesel is very low and home heating oil is also very low; mild weather so far this fall has kept the shortage from becoming severe.
Here is an interesting twist; North Dakota now produces about 125,000 barrels of crude per day; just under half of that is refined in-state to fuel products; the remainder of the crude and much of the refined product is piped out of the state (amount not specified at the meeting). During this shortage period from late summer to present, the pipeline terminals at Fargo and Grand Forks have been out of product or severely limited. As a result tanker trucks must go to Alexandria, Mn. or further, to wait in line sometimes for 12 hours, to get product and haul it back into ND. This gasoline and diesel product may be the same product produced at Mandan, now being hauled back.
Near the conclusion of the one hour and 45 minute meeting the question was asked of the panel, “What do you see as the solution to this problem?” The answer takes two forms which are nearly the same in the end: the short term solution is more refining capacity by adding to existing refineries; the long term solution is building new refineries. So, building refineries is the solution. Does that surprise any one? How long have we known that? A dozen years, or more?
Senator Dorgan said that Congress is now at work on a new energy bill--how reassuring. This will be the umpteenth energy bill out of congress since Nixon was president; all of them intended to free us from the dependence on foreign oil. The dependence has increased every year since and the price continues to go up. We are importing gasoline and diesel fuel from Mexico and Canada because we can’t refine our own crude. There has not been a new refinery built in the U.S. for over 25 years. So, Senator Dorgan, how will the “new” energy bill fix that? Hal Neff

Adam Hamm for Insurance Commissioner!

2007-11-20T19:55:00.000-06:00

Election year will soon be upon us and the candidates are preparing their announcements. One very important post whose occupant will be determined by the voters next November is that of ND Insurance Commissioner. It appears as though one of the candidates looking for the support of his party is Representative Jasper Schneider. I'll tip my hand and come right out with the fact that I intend to support our incumbent Insurance Commissioner Adam Hamm, but before my endorsement I'll share a few reasons why.

Jasper Schneider has a well documented record of hopping merrily from project to project without ever really seeing any of them through to their logical conclusions. Schneider has spent two years as an Attorney, and apparently lost interest in that venture. He's spent one year as a State Legislator, elected by the people of his home district, and quickly decided that gig wasn't for him either. Now he's decided he wants to become Insurance Commissioner, which raises some legitimate questions. Jasper is 28 years old and has shown a pattern indicating an inability to commit to one job. Is it reasonable to expect ND voters to take a chance on a candidate whom, based on past precedent, will not stick with the job he is elected to? Is it the responsibility of voters to help him weed through jobs, worse, elected positions, like so many sock drawers, until he finds the one he likes?

In some of Schneider's first comments regarding the Insurance Commissioner position, he said that the post would give him a platform from which to help handle the state's troubled Workforce Safety and Insurance Agency. Given the fact that the Insurance Department has no regulatory involvement with WSI, this begs the question(s)--does he even know what statutory authority the Insurance Commissioner has, AND that any change in this role involving WSI would require legislative action (a role he apparently can't wait to desert)?

For my money, Insurance Commissioner Adam Hamm deserves our votes next November. He has a proven record of commitment and dedication as a successful Attorney for nearly a decade including the difficult prosecution and conviction of Kyle Bell for the murder of 11 year old Jeanna North. The people of North Dakota should expect, and in fact deserve an Insurance Commissioner who brings a depth of experience to the job instead of a year or two of this or that.

Posted by: J. Trandem

Duncan wraps up a busy Republican week in ND

2007-11-17T12:34:00.000-06:00

RNC Chairman Robert M. "Mike" Duncan had a very busy day in Fargo Friday as he hosted a Rountable Discusssion, College Republican Meeting and a Cass County Grassroots Meeting. Between each event his time was filled with media interviews.

Chairman Duncan explained the role of the RNC as one that focuses on nominating a Republican Presidential nominee, promotes the Party Platform and of course, does a little fundraising. He, of course, did not comment on the current Republican Presidential hopefuls, since he needs to remain neutral.

During his meeting with the College Republicans, Duncan talked more about his history and how he got into politics. He has been fortunate enough to work on 5 Presidential campaigns, dating back to Richard M. Nixon. He encouraged the students to stay involved, volunteer and look at some of the opportunities the RNC has to offer.

We were very fortunate to have Chairman Duncan visit our great state at a time that the Republican Party is gearing up for the next election cycle. Thank you, Chairman Duncan!

RNC Chairman in Fargo today

2007-11-16T12:48:00.000-06:00

RNC Chairman Robert M. "Mike" Duncan is in Fargo today meeting with major donors, state legislative leaders, media representatives and others to hear what is on the mind of North Dakota Republicans.

It has been an exctiting day so far, with many people voicing their opinions and sharing ideas. A summary will be posted later.

Candidates' similarities differ

2007-11-14T15:49:00.000-06:00

Apparently Democratic Representative Jasper Schneider is willing to go against his party’s bandwagon and quit in the middle of his first term to run for State Insurance Commissioner. Apparently it is ok for a Democrat to only serve a quarter of his freshman term as an elected official, while the Democratic Party continues to rant and complain about Republicans.

The Bismarck Tribune has said that a race between Insurance Commissioner Adam Hamm and Schneider would be interesting because of their similar backgrounds – they are both attorneys. That is where it ends.

For almost a decade, Hamm has handled high profile cases and gained a wealth of knowledge and experience as an attorney. Conversely, Schneider has been with his family’s law firm for only 2 years.

Hamm’s substantial experience as an advocate for people speaks for itself and makes him the clear choice.

Don't miss Governor Hoeven's Campaign Kickoff

2007-11-12T03:35:00.000-06:00

Gov. Hoeven's Re-election Campaign Kickoff

Tuesday, November 13th, 2007

Fargo at 9:00 a.m.

Echelon Corporation, 1749 38th St. S. – 1-29 Frontage Road

Grand Forks at 12:00 p.m.

UND Center for Innovation, 4200 James Ray Drive

Bismarck at 3:00 p.m.

Bismarck Technical Center, 1200 W. College Drive

Minot at 6:00 p.m.

Holiday Inn, 2200 Burdick Expressway E.

Conrad & Dorgan oppose Mukasey

2007-11-12T03:31:00.000-06:00

WASHINGTON - Both of North Dakota's senators voted against the nomination of retired judge Michael Mukasey as attorney general, saying he should be more specific about the government's definition of torture.Mukasey was confirmed late Thursday by a 53-40 vote. Six Democrats and one independent joined Republicans in sealing his confirmation.
North Dakota's two Democratic senators, Byron Dorgan and Kent Conrad, joined other members of their party in voting against his confirmation because of his refusal to say whether the waterboarding interrogation technique is torture."That's just not acceptable," Conrad said Friday.Dorgan agreed, saying the debate over torture is a "defining issue in terms of this country's character and moral authority."Waterboarding, used by interrogators to make someone feel as if he or she is going to drown, is banned by domestic law and international treaties. But U.S. law applies to Pentagon personnel and not the CIA. The Bush administration won't say whether it has allowed the agency's employees to use it against terror detainees.
Both North Dakota senators said they also opposed Mukasey because of answers during his Senate confirmation hearing that left open how much power he would allow the president. Senators sought to pin him down on how much legal leeway he would give the president, as authorized in the Constitution, beyond laws that have been approved by Congress.The struggle over the balance of power was a hot topic during the confirmation hearings, underscoring two issues confronting the Justice Department - the extent of presidential authority to eavesdrop on terror suspects, and congressional subpoenas to force administration aides to testify about whether politics influenced the firings of nine U.S. attorneys last year.
"The implication of his answers were that the president has almost unlimited power," said Dorgan.Conrad said that issue raises serious questions in his mind."The courts interpret the law, not the president," he said.Mukasey replaces Alberto Gonzales, who was forced from office over his handling of the Justice Department

Pelosi priorites questionable - this blog is not true.

2007-11-09T10:22:00.000-06:00

Apologies are in order...this was not checked out and is not true.

Boy, are we in trouble... This woman is frightening. Take special note of the last paragraph. Is she really this whacked out?

Nancy Pelosi condemned the new record highs of the stock market as "just another example of Bush policies helping the rich get
richer". "First Bush cut taxes for the rich and the economy has
rebounded with new record low unemployment rates, which only means wealthy employers are getting even wealthier at the expense of the underpaid working class".

She went on to say "Despite the billions of dollars being spent in Iraq our economy is still strong and government tax revenues are at all time highs. What this really means is that business is exploiting the war effort and working Americans, just to put money in their own pockets".

When questioned about recent stock market highs she responded "Only the rich benefit from these record highs. Working Americans, welfare recipients, the unemployed and minorities are not sharing in these obscene record highs". There is no question these windfall profits and income created by the Bush administration need to be taxed at 100% rate and those dollars redistributed to the poor and working class". Profits from the stock market do not reward the hard work of our working class who, by their hard work, are responsible for generating these corporate profits that create stock market profits for the rich. We in congress will need to address this issue to either tax these profits or to control the stock market to prevent this unearned income t o flow to the rich."

When asked about the fact that over 80% of all Americans have investments in mutual funds, retirement funds, 401Ks, and the stock market she replied "That may be true, but probably only 5% account for 90% of all these investment dollars. That's just more "trickle down" economics claiming that if a corporation is successful that everyone from the CEO to the floor sweeper benefit from higher wages and job security which is ridiculous". "How much of this 'trickle down' ever gets to the unemployed and minorities in our county? None, and that's the tragedy of these stock market highs."

"We democrats are going to address this issue after the election when we take control of the congress. We will return to the 60% to 80% tax rates on the rich and we will be able to take at least 30% of all current lower income tax payers off the rolls and increase government income substantially." We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest."

When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she
replied : "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed
and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long ways to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'."

It's time to get rid of the children in Congress

2007-11-09T10:20:00.000-06:00

Jeff Miller, Rugby

In most homes with small children, there is always an additional resident. Whenever something is broken or spilled and a parent asks who is responsible, the answer is always “not me.” As the children grow and mature, Mr. Not Me usually moves away. It has always been a mystery as to where every Mr. Not Me goes to.
We now know the answer. Every Mr. Not Me ends up in Washington. No matter what happens in D.C., the culprit is always Mr. Not Me. Whether it is Congress or the administration, Mr. Not Me is the bad guy who stops Washington from working. Listen to any career congressman trying to explain why nothing ever gets done and he or she will always say the magic words, “It’s not me!!”
Mr. Not Me seems to flourish in settings where cronyism, corruption, careerism and complacency are the norm. No place is more awash with those four “Cs” than Congress. They have more excuses for failure than a 6-year-old caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Of course, in case of Congress, it is the taxpayers’ cookie jar that is being raided.
Since it is not very likely that our elected officials in Congress are going to mature and grow up, as our children did, the only way to get rid of Mr. Not Me is to get rid of the children in Congress. In other words, they all need to be voted out. These career cookie-jar raiders will continue to fail the American people until they are given a permanent time out.

Franken needs a better list

2007-11-09T10:10:00.000-06:00

Somehow it came to our mailbox addressed to me here at Bismarck. Al Franken is looking for money to support his run for the Democrat nomination as Senate candidate in Minnesota. I’d say this mailing missed the mark. Franken has this to say, “the Republican slime machine has ramped up its attacks on me”. I say that’s a switch--he is the slime-source and fountain of crude and demeaning jokes about our country’s leaders for years. Franken states in his mailer, “I’ll never sell out my principles to the highest bidder”. As the saying goes, “you can’t sell what you don’t have”.
Hal Neff

Week of November 12th an exciting one for Republicans in North Dakota

2007-11-07T21:39:00.000-06:00

Governor Hoeven will kick off his 2008 re-election campaign in 4 locations across the state on Tuesday, November 13th. He will begin in Fargo at 9:00 am and finish up in Minot at 6:00 pm.
The complete schedule will be posted on the NDGOP website later this weekend.

Mayor Rudy Giuliani will arrive in Fargo on Wednesday for a fundraiser. There is a very nice luncheon planned at Seasons at Rose Creek.

The week will be capped off with RNC Chairman Mike Duncan stopping off in Fargo Friday for several meetings with area Republicans. Listen for him on Scott Hennen's show, as well.

What an exciting week!

In case you missed it, Grand Forks Herald applauds Centers of Exellence

2007-11-04T06:58:00.000-06:00

OUR OPINION : Centers of success
Published Sunday, November 04, 2007

Are they Centers of Excellence or centers of extravagance?
Some lawmakers seemed on the verge of asking that question when the most recent grant requests came up for review.
The legislators were smart to be skeptical. Notably, though, the centers passed the Legislature's test. They should pass North Dakotans' test, too: The centers use a proven method of economic development that has worked in other states and shows every sign of working here.
Earlier this week, state lawmakers approved $10 million in grants to four North Dakota colleges, The Associated Press reported. The money is going to six "Centers of Excellence" projects, including $4 million in two grants for UND. The first UND grant will help study and launch a medical device that could help stroke victims by dissolving blood clots. The second will research an aerial drone.
So, why give taxpayers' money to such projects in the first place?
The answer is this: As experience in other states showed, smart spending by careful governments can leverage private dollars and create good jobs. North Dakota leaders saw that happen elsewhere and decided to try it here.
These "public-private partnerships" have their roots in North Carolina. In 1959, a committee of business, government and academic leaders targeted some acreage near Raleigh and Durham, N.C., for focused development. The result was Research Triangle Park, a project meant "to attract research companies from around the nation to locate in a parcel of land surrounded by the state's research universities," the park's Web site, www.rtp.org, reports.
In 1959, North Carolina was a low-status and low-wage backwater, the Web site notes. Today, "more than 39,000 full-time equivalent employees work in RTP with an estimated 10,000 contract workers. These employees have combined annual salaries of over $2.7 billion. The average salary in the park is $56,000 annually, nearly 45 percent larger than the regional and national average."
Many states followed North Carolina's example. Utah's experience, from North Dakota's perspective, was especially important: In 1986, the Utah Legislature set up a Centers of Excellence Program "for the express purpose of supporting university-based, industry-supported cooperative research and development," the Utah Business and Economic Review recalled in 2006. The project's goal was to "develop technologies with commercial potential" by creating new companies and helping existing firms.
The study in the economic review was titled, "Utah's Centers of Excellence Program: A 20-Year Review." Its conclusion: "(I)t is evident the program has been successful in generating new companies. At least 65 ongoing businesses in Utah trace their roots directly to technologies funded through COE. These companies employ between 1,500 and 1,800 people thereby contributing to the state's economic base."
Furthermore, the "cost per job" of those 1,500 to 1,800 positions comes in at about $27,500, the study reports. "This estimate compares favorably to the $35,000 per . . job limits imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the $50,000 limit per new job imposed by the Small Business Administration."
North Dakota modeled its own Centers of Excellence program on Utah's.
Purists object that all companies ought to just rise or fall on their own. But most North Dakotans, like most Americans, long ago recognized that some government programs help rather than hurt.
State-supported universities are a classic example. Every UND student enjoys a "mini-G.I. Bill" of sorts, in that North Dakota pays a share of UND's per-student costs. The story is the same in every other state.
And the results of these and other controlled interventions are clear. "The U.S. has regained its status as the world's most competitive economy thanks to strong innovation and excellent universities, according to a survey released Wednesday by the World Economic Forum," The Associated Press reported this week.
Some government programs don't work. But some do; and by using safeguards such as legislative review, requiring a $2 match in private funding for every $1 in state aid, tracking the number of jobs created and so on, Centers of Excellence seem on their way to becoming a policy success.
Tom Dennis for the Herald

Senator Edward Kennedy lectures Judge Mukasey about water torture

2007-11-03T13:37:00.000-05:00

At long last, Senator Edward Kennedy faces the judge to talk about the human fear of drowning and the panic that grips the victim as they go under the water. It’s inhuman and it’s cruel according to the Senator’s ten minute long statement before the judge. It should not be done to anyone. This lecture, coming from Senator Kennedy, was directed at Judge Michael Mukasey, the President’s nominee for Attorney General of the United States. Thanks to the C-SPAN coverage of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings this past week, we got to see this unbelievable spectacle--Senator Kennedy in peak form at his outraged best--lecturing a U.S. District Judge about water torture.
- by Hal Neff

Hoeven good for North Dakota

2007-11-01T14:36:00.000-05:00

Val Bruels, Minot

John Hoeven is a very good governor and Mikey Hoeven is a wonderful first lady. I know my opinion is not unique since Hoeven enjoys the highest approval rate in our country and has for some time. But, it needs to be said because there is, already, a daily onslaught of personal attacks against the governor and the first family. The sad thing is that it is one sided. Hoeven has never resorted to the type of mudslinging, name calling and vindictiveness being employed by opponents.The results of his leadership are all around us. North Dakota was the only state not to lose jobs during the recession in the early years of the new century. The governor has set the tempo of our state’s entry into the high tech world of the new economy. This tempo has allowed companies like Cirrus Design, Microsoft and Marvin Windows to continue to expand in North Dakota. It has also created an environment for projects like the Blue Flint, Red Trail and Spiritwood, which are creating more jobs and better paying jobs while creating new markets for our farmers. We are now a world player.He has accomplished all this without engaging in silly partisan games, personal attacks, name calling or dirty tricks. Our governor has proven that real leadership means getting the job done for the citizens of North Dakota.Our state is moving ahead thanks to the leadership and vision of our governor. North Dakotans are proud of what has been accomplished and look forward with confidence to the future. For that, we all owe a very big thank you to Gov. John Hoeven.

Attacks on Governor Hoeven's accomplishments are foolish

2007-11-01T14:34:00.000-05:00

Eric Halvorson, Fargo

The silly season has already started. Usually, it doesn’t really begin until the year of the actual election. But some folks must have a whole lot of time on their hands. So far, the favorite target of these silly season songbirds is Gov. John Hoeven, who is busy leading our state.
These silly season songbirds are a diverse group. They include members in good standing on all sides of the political spectrum. There is one distinctive trait that all of these cowboys share. They only look in one direction; backward. They are like the words of the old cowboy song, “They saddle their horses up backwards because they only want to see where they’ve been.”
Fortunately, our governor has his eyes and his administration firmly focused on the future. Under his “can do” leadership, North Dakota is successfully moving into the new economy of the 21st century without sacrificing the timeless features that have made this state a great place to live and raise a family.
Ronald Reagan said that great things can be accomplished if you don’t worry about who gets the credit. Hoeven and the people of North Dakota are accomplishing great things because they aren’t worried about getting credit. hat is why the voters will ignore the rantings and ravings of these silly season songbirds and sign up John and Mikey Hoeven for another term.

North Dakota Leaders comment on Schafer nomination

2007-11-01T11:15:00.000-05:00

Governor John Hoeven issued this statement: "Former Gov. Schafer’s appointment is a great opportunity for North Dakota farmers and ranchers, as well as for North Dakota’s rural communities, to have their voices heard in Washington. His knowledge of rural economies, as well as his relationship with our congressional delegation, will be a great asset as he takes on the responsibilities of the nation’s chief agriculture officer. We extend our congratulations to Gov. Schafer. This is a real honor for North Dakota.”

North Dakota Agriculture Commissioner Roger Johnson says he's happy former Governor Ed Schafer has been nominated as federal agriculture secretary. Johnson says Schafer is predictable and a good administrator. He says it's an honor for North Dakota to have someone nominated for ag secretary.

The leaders of North Dakota's two biggest farm groups say they anticipate former Governor Ed Schafer being a popular federal agriculture secretary. State Farm Bureau President Eric Aasmundstad and Farmers Union President Robert Carlson both say they look forward to working with Schafer.

Senator Kent Conrad released the following statement today regarding the announcement that President Bush has nominated former North Dakota Gov. Edward Schafer to be his next Agriculture secretary. "I just congratulated Governor Schafer and said I welcomed his nomination as a fellow North Dakotan. I hope he will support this Farm Bill, which is good for our state and the nation. I look forward to speaking with him about his views on the Food and Energy Security Act currently under consideration."

Putting N.D. on the map

2007-10-26T13:11:00.000-05:00

From Kim Koppelman:

Most eyes in our region were focused on a football game more than 200 miles away on Saturday – the contest between the North Dakota State University Bison and the Minnesota Gophers. You could almost hear the cheers all the way from the Metrodome when the Bison defeated the Gophers, avenging a 1-point loss last season in a game during which they had outplayed their Big Ten opponents, but came up just short on the scoreboard.
West Fargo’s own Tyler Roehl was a star of Saturday’s game for the Bison, setting a new school rushing record. Our community can be proud of this former Packer.
This weekend’s events are significant because the Bison’s performance, to a great extent, represents North Dakota, and not only on the athletic field.
Formerly a dominant Division II football program, NDSU overcame naysayers and scoffers when it made the move to Division I a few years ago. In classic fashion, the school and its athletic teams demonstrated that reaching for greater things pays far better dividends than allowing others to convince you it can’t be done.
They not only made the transition and were competitive, they are now the No. 1 team in what used to be known as the NCAA’s Division
I-AA.
North Dakota has often been the underdog, and we’ve often surpassed expectations. North Dakota native and former national newsman, Eric Sevareid, once said “North Dakota is a rectangular-shaped blank spot on the nation’s consciousness.” Very true. That’s not a slam. It doesn’t mean that our state has a bad reputation – just that, for many, it has no reputation. People simply don’t know much about North Dakota.
A professional who moved back to North Dakota from across the country in order to work here told me that when he moved in and met his new neighbor, the neighbor asked where he had moved from. When he told him, the neighbor asked, “Why would you want to live here?”
Now may be a good time for all of us to take stock in our state and realize how much we really have to offer.
It’s up to those of us who live hear and love this place to put North Dakota on the map. That’s happening more and more, today, on many levels. Of course, North Dakota has long been a renowned agricultural leader, often called the “breadbasket of the nation,” but more is going on here.
From the athletic field to the business world, from higher education to quality of life indicators, North Dakota is being noticed and is surpassing expectations. I’m impressed, as I visit with legislators, governors, judges, business leaders and others around the nation, to learn that those who know something about North Dakota usually have something good to say.
The nation is fast discovering what companies like Microsoft and football teams like the Minnesota Gophers have realized – North Dakota is a place to be reckoned with.
North Dakota natives applying for jobs in other states are often hired on the spot, when employers familiar with our work ethic learn where they’re from. Now, many of those quality, home-grown folks are coming home, recalling that the place where they grew up is a pretty good place to sink roots, build a future and raise a family.
If all of us puff out our chests a bit, maybe it won’t violate our culture of modesty, after all. In fact, a mention now and then of what a great place North Dakota is will get the word out and help us grow and build for the future. Instead of wringing our hands about out-migration, slow population growth, weather, or any of the other tired, familiar themes we’ve complained about, now may be a good time to see the glass as half-full instead
of half-empty and play a part in taking our state to new levels
we’ve never seen before.
Together, we can do it. After all, we’re from North Dakota.
Koppelman, R-West Fargo, has represented District 13 in the N.D. House of Representatives since 1994. He is chairman of the Constitutional Revision Committee and member of the Political Subdivisions and Judiciary committees.

In case you missed it....Mathern not leadership material

2007-10-22T10:14:00.000-05:00

From the Minot Daily News:

Tim Mathern's attempts to show he’s ready to be governor aren’t working
Tim Mathern seems intent on showing he’s worthy of being governor by continually criticizing plans involving the state penitentiary. It isn’t working.Mathern is exploring the idea of running for governor, although he’s not made an official announcement. His latest attempt to demonstrate his gubernatorial mettle has him at odds with Tim Schuetzle, the warden at the State Penitentiary in Bismarck.Mathern, a Democratic state senator from Fargo, says a recent review by the American Correctional Association shows that the prison meets all mandatory standards for accreditation. That, Mathern reasons, means the state shouldn’t spend $42 million to remodel and expand the main penitentiary, and it certainly shouldn’t spend more than $100 million to build a new facility.Schuetzle says the review does not address the penitentiary’s shortcomings. He says the audit does not show there isn’t a need for improvements.Mathern shouldn’t forget that he and the rest of the Legislature created the current mess involving the prison issue. In his budget, Gov. John Hoeven proposed spending $42 million to remodel and expand parts of the prison facility, and set aside money to pay for it up front. But the Senate and the House couldn’t agree on anything, and the Legislature ended up doing nothing to solve the prison issue – other than creating a committee to study the subject, although the corrections department had already done that prior to the 2007 session.Mathern is saying that our state prison meets the mandatory standards for accreditation, so the prison is good enough.He’s wrong. The prison isn’t good enough. It has areas that need fixing now, not later. In his role as governor, Hoeven tried to address those problems. His efforts were continually thwarted – by state lawmakers like Mathern. If Mathern can’t understand this issue, maybe he shouldn’t run for governor.

Don't miss the Republican Roundup!

2007-10-22T10:10:00.000-05:00

BISMARCK, ND – Today Republican State Chairman Gary Emineth emphasized the importance of the upcoming Republican Roundup. “We are one year out from the 2008 elections which makes this a great time for Republicans to gather and strategize for the upcoming campaign season,” said Emineth. “We look forward to a strong showing in 2008 as Governor Hoeven, with his strong leadership, runs for reelection at the top of our ticket.”

Emineth also stated, “That various leaders of Presidential Campaigns will be in Bismarck over the weekend of October 26 & 27. They include Tagg Romney, son of Mitt Romney, Mark Campbell, National Political Director of the Giuliani Campaign, and Rich Galen, National Advisor of the Thompson Campaign. Even though this Straw Poll is non-binding, it will give us an indication about how the Party may vote during the February 5th Presidential Caucus. During that Caucus we will determine the number of delegates each Republican Presidential Candidate will receive at the National Convention.” The Republican State Central Committee recently changed their bylaws, requiring a candidate to receive a minimum of 15% of the total ballots cast to be eligible to receive any of North Dakota’s National Convention Delegates.

Tagg Romney coming to Presidential Preference Straw Poll

2007-10-16T14:15:00.000-05:00

Tagg Romney has been officially confirmed as a guest speaker at the Republican Party's Presidential Preference Straw Poll. Tagg, one of five sons, will speak on behalf of his father, Republican Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney.
We are extremely excited to have the Romney campaign represented during the Straw Poll, which will be held during the Republican Roundup October 26th & 27th.

In case you missed it, Grand Forks Herald says it nicely:

2007-10-03T12:24:00.000-05:00

Here's a tip for North Dakota Democrats who'd like to use “eight years is enough” as a campaign theme against Republican Gov. John Hoeven:
Don't.
The double standard is so laugh-out-loud funny that the speaker might as well be wearing a clown suit.
Here are some things that would have to be true in order for prominent Democrats' call for term-limiting Hoeven to be believed:
-- Their suggestion that “eight years is enough” would have to apply to the state's congressional delegation, too.
But it doesn't. Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., has held his current Senate seat since 1992. He held the seat now occupied by Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., for six years before that. That's a total of 21 years.
Speaking of Dorgan, he was elected to the Senate in 1992, 15 years ago. Fifteen years: That would be eight years plus seven years, “eight is enough” Democrats should recall. And before getting elected to the Senate, Dorgan served in the House for 12 years.
As for Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D., he also was elected to Congress in 1992, 15 years ago. In 2000, Pomeroy ran for his fifth term against Republican John Dorso. Funny, but we don't recall “Eight is enough” being used against Pomeroy in that campaign, at least not by Democrats.
-- In 1991, the Democrats were telling then-Gov. George Sinner, a Democrat, that he shouldn't run again. But they weren't. Several times in 1991, newspaper stories analyzed Sinner's prospects for getting reelected to a third term, the Herald's archives show. Not one of those stories quotes a Democratic leader saying anything close to “eight is enough.”
-- Leading Democratic spokespeople for the “eight is enough” view also apply that standard to themselves.
But they don't. Here's a message from state Sen. Joel Heitkamp, D-Hankinson, to Hoeven: “You've had eight years to accomplish what you've (wanted), now get out of the way and let someone else,” Heitkamp told a reporter.
Heitkamp first was elected to the North Dakota Senate in 1994, 13 years ago.
State Sen. Tim Mathern, D-Fargo, is considering a run for governor. Mathern's a fine man and will make a great candidate, but only if he does better than this:
“Mathern says eight years is enough for someone to be governor,” The Associated Press reported.
Mathern has served as a senator since 1986.
Property taxes, yes. The North Dakota economy, yes. Hoeven's intentions regarding the U.S. Senate, yes. All of those issues are fair game in the gubernatorial race.
But not term limits, at least when the would-be “term-limiter” happily blew past eight years in office half a decade or more ago. For such a critic, it ought to be hard even to say “eight is enough” and keep a straight face.

Current SCHIP bill not the answer

2007-10-02T11:43:00.000-05:00

Should a family that qualifies to buy a $250,000 home be eligible for free health insurance? That is essentially the question currently being debated in Washington, DC.
The State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), is receiving a great deal of discussion now as Congress considers its reauthorization. This program, called Healthy Steps in North Dakota, has been a very important tool for providing health care for children through age 18 in low-income families, but the bill recently passed by the US House and Senate is a radical expansion of the existing program.

The new bill would permit coverage up to 300% of the federal poverty level (FPL). 300% would be $61,974/year for a family of four. An earlier version, supported by many in Congress, would have covered families to 400% of the poverty level which is calculated to be $82,629/year for a family of four. That is way above the average income for North Dakotans.

Someone with an annual income of the 300% of poverty level, using standard formulas, can qualify for a monthly payment of $1446, permitting them to purchase a home valued at approximately $175,000. A family earning 400% of poverty level can qualify for $1928/month payment which would permit them to purchase a home valued at approximately $245,000. Should families who can buy homes for $175,000-$250,000 be permitted to receive government-paid health insurance? That is a welfare program for middle income families. The higher the income limits, the more state tax dollars will be needed to provide coverage, since there is a 25% state match required to draw down federal funds.

H.R. 976 as recently passed by Congress would expand the SCHIP program by $35 billion over the next five years, to a $60 billion program. President Bush has supported a $5 billion expansion over 5 years which would be a 20% increase in funding above the baseline. The bill dramatically expands federal spending far beyond what is necessary to reauthorize SCHIP responsibly.

The bill would permit states to expand coverage to “children” up to age 25, as well as to family members and caregivers for children in families whose incomes qualify for coverage. This could cause people who currently have health insurance to drop it and opt into the government program. This would be a dramatic encroachment of government-run health care and is an obvious attempt to move closer to universal health care coverage, way beyond the original intent to provide health care for children.

North Dakota currently permits families up to 140% of the federal poverty to qualify for SCHIP coverage, and that will move to 150% as soon as Congress reauthorizes the program. North Dakota uses net income , rather than gross income, to qualify. In North Dakota, unlike many other states, expenses such as taxes, child care costs, and child support paid are subtracted from gross income before determining the qualifying income level, resulting in more families qualifying, especially those with high child care costs. A North Dakota family of four can have a net income of $28,920/year at 140% and receive SCHIP benefits and will be able to make $30,986/year at 150%.

The Health Steps program in North Dakota includes vision, dental, and prenatal coverage for children up through age 18, which is a significant advantage over many states’ programs. The idea has been to provide as much coverage as possible for those who need it the most

How will this federal increase in coverage be paid? A proposed cigarette tax increase of 83 cents per pack will be imposed and can escalate to $1/pack. Whether or not this is the right way to pay for the additional costs of the expanded program is another discussion. Many existing programs are having the legs cut out from under them in order to fund expansions of pet programs. One serious funding change takes money away from Medicare Advantage which benefits low income seniors by reducing out-of-pocket costs. The payment changes are so draconian that the likely effect will be to eliminate options for many beneficiaries, particularly in rural counties or small, urban communities where earlier sessions of Congress expressly intended to provide choices for beneficiaries. It is wrong to balance health care for middle income families on the backs of low-income seniors.

Enhancing SCHIP so that it can better serve North Dakota children is an appropriate goal, but the current bill has too many flaws. After a Presidential veto, all parties can get down to work to reauthorize a very important program at levels that we all can support.
- by Judy Lee, Chair - Senate Human Services Committee

State Chairman Gary Emineth weighs in

2007-09-30T14:08:00.000-05:00

I love a great view. It is hard to beat a summer evening standing on a deck overlooking the Missouri river. A breathtaking sight, but completely hidden to anyone in the valley. It’s all in where you’re standing. Since becoming chairman of the ND GOP three months ago, I have stood back and watched, listened, and thought. Now it’s time to say something.

Once there was a boy who wanted to be a soldier in the army when he grew up. I thought it was cute. He graduated from High School and joined the army. I thought it was a good choice. On October 28, I will watch my nephew, John, board a plane for Iraq. It’s hard to know what to think.

In the words of Thomas Paine, “…these are the times that try men’s souls...” And they are. In times of war and crisis, the character of patriotism is tested. But patriotism is also an everyday virtue which requires”… education supplemented by self-interest.” I am writing to do some education.

First I’d invite those down in the valley whining about the “bleak landscape” to come up and see for themselves. I can’t buy this patently liberal viewpoint packaged as an “independent perspective.” We North Dakotans can send out a strong message to independent voters. Consider the facts. The view from here isn’t so bleak.

ND Republicans hold a majority in the legislature thanks to a strong grass roots organization; any lost ground is due to over $500,000 of out-of-state contributions raised by the democrats state party.
Because of the policies of a Republican administration, incomes are growing faster than the National Average. 25,000 new jobs have been created.
As a result of a thriving economy, the GOP passed record support for education at all levels.
The largest tax relief in ND history was passed –120 million dollars.
An enormously popular and widely effective Governor will lead the GOP ticket.

If the Republican Presidential candidates aren’t exciting enough, tune in to the Democratic debates for entertainment. Through the digressions and diatribes I have asked myself, “Where are these folks from? Where is Simon when we need him?” No American idols here.

In contrast, I’ve had some interactions with my dad and my father-in-law. Both agree that there are problems but refuse to take life in America for granted. They haven’t forgotten when an oppressive regime was a real threat.

It takes sacrifice and resolve to preserve freedom. May I remind you that there have been no terrorist attacks on American soil since 9/ll. Many attempts have been thwarted thanks to the vigilance and courage of those sworn by sacred oath to defend this country.

Patriotism is not old-fashioned; it’s a virtue as worthy as justice . Not always popular, it is always necessary.
The tears will come as I say good-bye to John. But these words will be there, too.

“I’m proud to be an American..where at least I know I’m free…”

As we prepare to elect the next President consider this-- The world needs more than a daydream believer or a homecoming queen.

In case you missed it, Forum Editorial: Democrats' sour notes predictable

2007-09-28T12:40:00.000-05:00

North Dakotans who grasp the astonishing progress the state has made in the past seven years will welcome Gov. John Hoeven’s decision to seek a third four-year term. Democrats, whose party loyalty tends to warp their judgment (just like Republicans with similar blind allegiance to party), will react as expected: petty and rigidly partisan.
Hoeven and Lt. Gov. Jack Dalrymple will be on the ballot in 2008. If the successful Republican team wins, Hoeven will make history as the only governor to be elected to three four-year terms. Democratic Gov. William Guy served 12 years, but in two two-year terms and two four-year terms.
The Democrats’ reaction to the governor’s announcement hit all the right notes, if one is a Democrat first and a North Dakotan second. Hired party mouthpieces and legislative leaders tried to blame the governor for rising property taxes (a local matter), a perceived population drain (slowed and just about halted during Hoeven’s tenure) and a lack of leadership.
That last one is really nonsense. Hoeven, after all, is the governor who challenged the mossback leadership of his own party in order to secure mandated, sustainable pay raises for public school teachers. He relentlessly pursued his “centers of excellence” program, which has become the seedbed for growing focused world-class university research.
In concert with enlightened legislators on both sides of the political aisle the governor championed a comprehensive energy development incentive package, which is a model for the nation. Shortly after his first election victory he worked hand in glove with North Dakota’s Democratic congressional delegation – and against the Republican White House – on a new farm bill, which turned out to be one of the best farm bills ever cobbled together.
Sen. Tim Mathern, D-Fargo, is flirting with a challenge to Hoeven, having formed an exploratory committee. In reacting to the governor’s announcement, the veteran senator said he was disappointed Hoeven “is not doing more with his leadership potential and position.” Of course, there’s always more to do. But is it so difficult for Democrats to recognize and acknowledge that the governor has done quite a lot with his leadership position?
North Dakotans consistently give the governor approval ratings near
80 percent. They have a better understanding of Hoeven’s dedication than do a handful of Democratic partisans. Regarding the governor’s performance, Democrats couldn’t be more out of step with the people of North Dakota.
Forum editorials represent the opinion of Forum management and the newspaper’s Editorial Board.

In case you missed it, here's what the Minot Daily News thinks:

2007-09-28T10:42:00.001-05:00

Hoeven will make history
OK, so it’s not officially official yet, but Gov. John Hoeven will seek a third term in office.Hoeven, 50, announced Tuesday that senior aide Don Larson has taken a leave of absence to run Hoeven’s re-election campaign. Hoeven will make an official re-election announcement later this year. Lt. Gov. Jack Dalrymple will remain on the ticket with Hoeven.It’s good news for North Dakota.Hoeven has been a strong leader for the state during his two terms, and there’s no reason to believe that won’t continue if he’s elected again.So far, Hoeven has no official challengers. Fargo state Sen. Tim Mathern is the only Democrat to declare that he is considering a bid for the party’s endorsement for governor. Mathern could have some support in his home territory if he decides to run, and he might do better than Hoeven’s 2004 opponent, Joe Satrom, who received less than 30 percent of the vote. But it’s hard to see Mathern defeating the popular Hoeven.No North Dakota governor has been elected to three four-year terms. Barring any unforeseen circumstances between now and November 2008, we fully expect Hoeven to be the first.

Don Larson Joins Hoeven Committee

2007-09-25T13:48:00.000-05:00

9/25/07

BISMARCK, N.D. – Gov. John Hoeven today announced that Don Larson has left his position in the Governor’s Office to manage the governor’s re-election campaign. Larson, a Minot native, has served on Hoeven’s senior staff for the past three years working in communications, legislative relations and policy development. Hoeven will make his official re-election announcement later this fall.

Legislator engages in radical partisanship

2007-09-25T13:41:00.000-05:00

Kyle Handegard Fargo Commentary - 09/23/2007
It’s unfortunate that Rep. Kari Conrad, D-Minot, N.D., (letter of Sept. 11) has chosen to echo the same radical partisanship to North Dakotans that has paralyzed Washington, D.C., in recent years.
Gov. John Hoeven is doing things right, starting with jobs and the economy. Under his leadership, North Dakota has entirely changed its approach to economic development. Our state has created 25,000 new jobs and seen economic growth across the board, including in manufacturing, energy, valueadded agriculture and technology-based businesses. These jobs are raising wages and income, while creating a climate of opportunity in North Dakota not seen in decades.
And it doesn’t stop there. In the last legislative session alone, the governor’s policies made possible more than $100 million in property tax relief, $100 million in K-12 education funding and $90 million in support for higher education, scholarships and other programs to help hold the line on tuition for our younger people.
In the field of renewable energy, ethanol production will soon increase more than tenfold, to about a half-billion gallons, with more on the way. Wind energy production will go from near zero to more than 600 megawatts. At the same time -- and without a tax increase -- North Dakota has been able to devote an unprecedented $100 million more in the current budget to help seniors, children and people with disabilities.
Rep. Conrad needs to look around our state and cut the political sniping.

Rep. Conrad begins attack on Governor

2007-09-25T13:36:00.000-05:00

Stan Stein Wahpeton, N.D.
Opinion - 09/19/2007
The Democratic attack machine has begun. Democrats realize that they cannot defeat Gov. John Hoeven, if he decides to run for another term, on the issues and on a vision for North Dakota. So they begin their vaunted personal attack campaign 14 months prior to the 2008 election.

Leading off what will be an endless parade of personal attacks on our governor is Rep. Kari Conrad, D-Minot, with her letter to The Forum. It really doesn’t matter who signs the letters and op-ed pieces because the message will be that Hoeven is bad for North Dakota. What they really mean, of course, is that Hoeven is bad for Democratic Party prospects to ever win the governor’s office.

Conrad’s lengthy dissertation (Sept. 11 letter) about our governor is rather humorous. She cites Peter Drucker, an expert on business and management. The humor is that a Democrat actually quoted someone connected to capitalism and free enterprise. Usually, Democrats spend their time attacking entrepreneurs, small-business owners, and business people, in general. And, their interest in business rests, solely, in raising taxes.

Conrad’s entire missive really does highlight the difference between the Democrats and Hoeven. Her view of the future is a state on welfare. The governor’s vision for North Dakota is a thriving state playing an increasingly important role in the world economy. His initiatives in education, agribusiness, energy, transportation, and the world of high tech, have put North Dakota in a great position to prosper in the future.

Under the Democrats, the only growth industry would be welfare. Hoeven is committed to a future of personal prosperity based on a growing, diversified, and competitive economy. There is a huge difference. It is the difference between dependence and independence. Given the choice, I have no doubt that North Dakota will choose independence and Hoeven, if he seeks another term.

In Case You Missed It ….. Grand Forks Herald Editorial: OUR OPINION : A budget ‘big lie' or core truth?

2007-06-06T16:43:00.000-05:00

“Today, in an editorial, the Grand Forks Herald correctly pointed out that Senator Conrad's budget does not pass the smell test. His continued claims that his budget does not raise taxes are just not true. Liberal media outlets like the New York Times, The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times report that Conrad’s budget lets some of President Bush’s tax cuts expire. That is a tax increase and no amount of spin, double talk or flip-flopping can disguise the fact that the Democrats voted to raise taxes. The Grand Forks Herald is correct. The voters of North Dakota deserve an explanation from Senator Conrad.”

Ken Karls, State Chairman North Dakota Republican Party.

Grand Forks Herald

OUR OPINION : A budget ‘big lie' or core truth?
- 06/06/2007

Our view:: The evidence leans against Sen. Kent Conrad's contention that the Congress' new budget doesn't raise taxes.

The New York Times says Congress' new budget lets some of President Bush's tax cuts expire. The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times say the same thing. But Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., insists that's not the case.

Who's right?

Conrad is the go-to guy on budget matters in the Senate. On this issue, however, the newspapers seem “more right” than he is. Rich Karlgaard, the North Dakotan who is publisher of Forbes magazine, actually wrote in his Web log that “Conrad is lying about the biggest-ever tax increase that is sure to come if the Dems sweep in 2008.” That's too strong, but Conrad at the very least either should explain his position more clearly or acknowledge that the other observers have a point.

Here's the issue. “Congress gave final approval on Thursday to a $2.9 trillion budget resolution for the 2008 fiscal year . . .,” The New York Times reported May 18.

“The plan assumes the expiration, at the end of 2010, of many of President Bush's tax cuts that have benefited mostly upper-bracket taxpayers, but it would extend popular middle-class tax breaks by two years.”

Conrad responded in a letter, saying that letting the tax breaks expire “is not our assumption. . . . (The budget) allows for new tax relief and the extension of other expiring provisions, as long as they are paid for.” But conservative columnist Bob Novak calls this “the big lie” because the bottom line is that the budget does let some tax cuts expire, and “that means higher taxes if Congress does nothing.”

Note Conrad's phrasing: The budget allows for the tax cuts' extension “as long as they are paid for.” If they're not - if Congress fails to take additional action to drum up the needed revenue - then, presumably, the tax cuts will expire, just as Novak, the Times and the others say.

Conrad's “as long as” qualifier in front of his “paid for” phrase suggests the tax cut are not currently paid for in the new budget.

Is there a flaw in this argument? If there is, then Conrad has every right to claim the new budget doesn't hike taxes. But if there is no flaw, then the critics are right to say the budget likely will let some taxes rise. The senator should clarify matters, and not just with the Herald.

- Tom Dennis for the Herald

If you would like to view the original story please click here
- END -

Prominent Democrat Praises Jaeger Run Elections

2007-05-29T09:43:00.000-05:00

N.D. 2006 elections glitch-free
By Lloyd Omdahl
The Forum - 05/29/2007

The 2006 mid-term election turned up scores of problems in the new voting systems implemented by states and counties under the federal “Help America Vote Act” passed in 2002 following the disastrous presidential election in Florida. Seventeen states reported major glitches in their new voting systems.

Florida is now in the process of dumping its touch-screen system for paper ballots. The Denver election commissioner resigned following a complete breakdown in many precincts. In Florida, Texas and Ohio, the voting machines were casting votes for the wrong candidates. In Texas, the centralized voter records system has so many flaws that registration officials in 200 counties want to get out of the process.

These frequent reports of election foul-ups have made citizens skeptical of the entire process, even in states that have experienced no difficulties. An undercurrent of alarm is spreading as another crucial presidential election approaches.

In response to the widespread failures, Congress is proposing new legislation requiring that electronic voting systems include printers able to create a paper trail for validating election results. Validation has become a major concern since some machines have malfunctioned and vendors have refused to provide officials with adequate reliability checks.

While the rest of the country is mired in an electoral morass, North Dakota has been scandal free in its implementation of the federal legislation, due largely to the insightful leadership of Secretary of State Al Jaeger.

If you would like to read the original story please visit: http://www.in-forum.com/Opinion/articles/167002

- END -

John Edwards War on Poverty - Edwards charges $55,000 to speak to UC Davis students about poverty

2007-05-22T10:40:00.000-05:00

SF Gate.com Poltics Blog

Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, who as a Democratic presidential candidate recently proposed an educational policy that urged "every financial barrier" be removed for American kids who want to go to college, has been going to college himself -- as a high paid speaker, his financial records show.

The candidate charged a whopping $55,000 to speak at to a crowd of 1,787 the taxpayer-funded University of California at Davis on Jan. 9, 2006 last year, Joe Martin, the public relations officer for the campus' Mondavi Center confirmed Monday.

That amount -- which comes to about $31 a person in the audience -- included Edwards' travel and airfare, and was the highest speaking fee in the nine appearances he made before colleges and universities last year, according to his financial records.

Clicker Here to read the rest of the story ...

John Edwards Puts Foot in Mouth Again

2007-05-21T15:35:00.000-05:00

Former Sen. John Edwards (D-NC) On Service To Our Country

John Edwards: "One Of The Things We Ought To Be Thinking About Is Some Level Of Mandatory Service To Our Country, So That Everybody In America, Not Just The Poor Kids Who Get Sent To War, Are Serving This Country." (Philip Elliott, "Edwards Touts Plan To End War In Iraq," The Associated Press, 5/21/07)

Conrad Lies about his Tax Increase!

2007-05-21T09:36:00.000-05:00

I thought you might find this article about Senator Conrad lying about his budget calling for the largest tax increase in US History.

Senator sells tax hike as no tax hike at all

May 21, 2007
BY ROBERT NOVAK Sun-Times Columnist

In routine party-line votes last week, both houses of Congress completed action on a Democratic-crafted budget containing the biggest tax increase in U.S. history. That this was overlooked attests to the legerdemain of Sen. Kent Conrad of Bismarck, N.D., chairman of the Senate Budget Committee.

Conrad, a 59-year-old third- termer, is a monotone orator whose use of statistical charts betrays his dozen years as a North Dakota state tax collector. He seems so straight an arrow that it is hard to accuse him of the big lie. But that is precisely what he has done.

Conrad has repeatedly insisted his budget contains no higher taxes. But how, then, can it increase discretionary spending $200 billion over five years, while promising immense budget surpluses in the future? By raising taxes not only on upper-bracket-income earners, but also on dividends and capital gains, affecting many more Americans.

Conrad has been in denial. After I described his budget as an old-fashioned Democratic tax-and-spend formula March 28, Conrad wrote a letter to newspapers accusing me of "blind ideology and meaningless partisan rhetoric." His budget, he said, "neither assumes nor requires a tax increase." That is exactly what he has been saying for months on the Senate floor.

A typical exchange occurred May 9 when Republican Sen. John Thune displayed spend-and-tax charts. "Not true," responded Conrad. "There is no tax increase in the proposal before us." In the final debate last Thursday, Conrad again contradicted the assertions of higher taxes by his Republican counterpart on the Budget Committee, Sen. Judd Gregg.

Different in kind from normal congressional debate, this is based not on the merits of higher taxes but disagreement on the existence of any increase. The mystery is easily solved. Under the Democratic budget, the Bush administration's tax cuts are permitted to expire at the end of 2010. That means higher taxes if Congress does nothing.

Click Here to read more

From the Grand Forks Herald - No deadline for this Devil Dog

2007-05-11T13:38:00.000-05:00

I wanted to share this letter about the Iraq War from a member of our Armed Forces on the ground in Iraq. I hope you will take the time to read it.

IN THE MAIL No deadline for this Devil Dog

Grand Forks Herald

Published Friday, May 11, 2007

GRAND FORKS - Our youngest son, Joshua Johnson, serves on active duty in the Marine Corps. He currently is on his second deployment to Iraq. He recently e-mailed his sister the letter below on his views on an early troop pullout. With Joshua's permission, we forwarded his letter to the Herald

His brother, Justin Johnson, is a first lieutenant in the Army and also is serving in Iraq. The brothers share the same view on an early troop pullout.

Bud Johnson Claudia Johnson

FALLUJAH, Iraq - Have you heard about all the garbage on the news about the war deadline? As a Marine serving in Iraq, I don't think there is such a thing as a deadline date in this war, and our country's next president has to understand that.

We have done a lot, but in no way is Iraq a free and stable country on its own yet. Out in town, I have seen the Iraqi police and the Iraqi Army patrolling the streets, but they need our guidance and support until they themselves have the confidence to say, “Thanks for the help guys, but we have it under control now.”

To come home now would send the world a message of weakness. To take the blood, sweat and tears that our own military and government contractors have put into this country, and then all of a sudden leave while the mission isn't yet fully accomplished, would be the same as putting our tails between our legs and running scared.

As for me, I would be embarrassed to be in the military of a country that just gave up, because some “suit and tie” thinks that the job may be too hard.

The men and women of the American military are determined to accomplish the mission at hand and in no way will even consider giving up.

I think it is a bunch of garbage that some in America want a deadline date. We should stay as long as we have to, and we are willing to do whatever it takes to accomplish the mission.

Joshua Johnson

Johnson is a sergeant in the U.S. Marines.

Pomeroy's Pals At it Again

2007-05-11T13:20:00.000-05:00

Fargo Forum Editorial: House war funding bill cynical ploy

Published Friday, May 11, 2007

The scheme by majority Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives to fund the Department of Defense on a month-to-month schedule should be rejected by anyone with good sense. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said this week the House plan would hobble the military’s procurement and deployment efforts. He urged the House to rethink what certainly is another attempt by anti-war Democrats to get the United States out of Iraq no matter the consequences.

Put aside for the moment whether the Iraq war is right, wrong, necessary or foolhardy. Funding the military in a time of war is required if only to ensure that the troops continue to receive the materials they need to fight and to protect themselves. The House would nickel-and-dime the defense appropriations in a way that would affect military readiness. So when opponents of the war say they support the troops but oppose the president’s war policy, the effort to disrupt funding for the military suggests they are being disingenuous.

Click Here to read more

Poolman: Assistance Available for Medicare Beneficiaries in the 'Donut Hole"

2007-05-08T09:01:00.000-05:00

Bismarck, ND – Insurance Commissioner Jim Poolman today advised seniors who may be in the donut hole with their Part D plans, that many of them may be eligible for free or reduced-cost prescriptions available through other sources.

Poolman said, "At this time of year, many beneficiaries with Part D plans are in or are going into the ‘donut hole’. The ‘donut hole’ is the portion each beneficiary has to spend out of their pocket before they will be eligible for coverage again from their Part D plan."

Some Prescription Assistance Programs (PAPs), which are sponsored by many pharmaceutical companies, offer assistance with free medications for those that are in the donut hole.

"Any Medicare beneficiary who has a Part D plan who is in the donut hole should call the Senior Health Insurance Counseling (SHIC) Program at 1.888.575.6611 to find out if free prescriptions are available to them," Poolman said.

# # #

SCHMIDT ANNOUNCES RECORD TREASURY BALANCE

2007-05-08T09:00:00.000-05:00

Bismarck, ND – State Treasurer Kelly Schmidt announced today that the State Treasury currently has invested a record balance of $745 million.

Schmidt said, "The current balance is a reflection of the strong economic growth that North Dakota is currently experiencing. My role as treasurer is to take advantage of our state's strong fiscal position and leverage the dollars to their greatest capacity through effective cash management."

Certificate of Deposits purchased recently totaled $142 million dollars and were invested with terms of 100 to 130 days. These investments will generate more than $1.6 million in interest income for the State of North Dakota’s Treasury.

Interest to the general fund is in excess of $27 million this biennium which represents a 550% increase in interest income over last biennium.

"This is good news for the citizens of North Dakota," Schmidt said. "By effectively investing our general fund dollars, we strengthen our overall financial position and ensure that the state has the resources to provide needed services to its citizens," Schmidt added.

-###-

HOEVEN SIGNS $118.6 MILLION, BROAD-BASED TAX RELIEF PACKAGE

2007-05-01T14:11:00.000-05:00

FARGO, N.D. – Gov. John Hoeven today was joined by legislators and local officials to sign Senate Bill 2032, a $118.6 million, broad-based tax relief package for the people of North Dakota.

“With our aggressive economic development efforts, we are growing and diversifying North Dakota’s economy,” Hoeven said. “A growing economy not only makes more opportunities available for our citizens, but also enables tax relief.”

“Back in September, we proposed a property tax relief plan to ease the burden of rising taxes for homeowners, farmers, ranchers and businesses,” Hoeven said. “Working with legislators, we passed a bill that provides a 10 percent income tax reduction against property taxes across the board. This measure, as well as additional financial assistance to counties for schools, State Aid Distribution, oil and gas revenues, social services and other expenses adds up to real tax relief for our citizens.”

The measure includes:

A 10 percent property tax credit against income taxes for homeowners, farmers, ranchers and commercial businesses.

Expanded Homestead Tax Credit relief for seniors and people with disabilities who own their own homes or rent.

Elimination of the marriage tax penalty for middle-income couples.

“We in the Tax Department are proud to have played a key role in initiating meaningful tax relief for the people of North Dakota, and now we are working to implement it,” said Tax Commissioner Cory Fong. “We will be laying the necessary groundwork over the months to come in order to inform the public of the benefits this plan provides to taxpayers.”

Property Tax Relief: Under the plan, married couples filing jointly, farmers, ranchers and businesses will be able to claim up to $1,000 of their property tax liabilities, and individual income tax payers will be able to deduct up to $500 on their state tax returns. Individuals who don’t have a state income tax liability can file for a voucher that they can apply to their local property taxes, or they can carry the credit forward for up to five years.

Tax Relief for Seniors and People with Disabilities: The bill nearly doubles funding for the Homestead Tax Credit program to $8.1 million. The program provides property tax relief for low income seniors and people with disabilities who own homes or rent. Expanded eligibility means a total of 11,350 homeowners will now qualify for the credit, 8,000 more than in 2005; more than 1,700 additional renters will also qualify, for a total of more than 3,000.

Elimination of the Marriage Penalty: SB 2032 creates a targeted tax credit of up to $300 to eliminate or reduce the marriage penalty for married taxpayers filing jointly.

In addition to the $118.6 million of tax relief included in SB 2032, other legislation helps to reduce the tax burden for local communities, including a landmark $91 million school funding bill. In addition, the state is also providing a combined $24 million to counties by assuming the counties’ costs for child support enforcement; disbursing more State Aid Distribution dollars; increasing oil and gas production tax revenues; and providing other state aid.

-###-

HOEVEN SIGNS $633 MILLION HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING BILL

2007-04-30T13:06:00.000-05:00

University System to Receive a 23 Percent Increase

MINOT, N.D. – Gov. John Hoeven today was joined by legislators, and campus and university system officials at Minot State University to sign House Bill 1003, the Higher Education budget bill, which increases funding for the system by an unprecedented $89 million. The bill raises the higher education budget to $633 million, with a 23 percent increase in state funding, and limits tuition increases for the next two years.

“Due to our aggressive economic development efforts and a growing economy, we are able to provide this funding, and at the same time, provide almost $120 million for broad-based tax relief and set aside more than $350 million in reserves for the future,” Hoeven said.

“For the first time ever, we are funding the needs-based budget of Higher Education at the level requested by the board,” Hoeven said. “This legislation, which includes a range of new grant, assistance and savings programs for students and families, will help hold the line on tuition increases and keep the cost of a college education in North Dakota affordable.”

The Higher Education budget increase includes:

A $71 million increase in operations, ongoing maintenance and technology costs to help hold the line on tuition.

An $18.6 million increase for capital projects – without bonding – to maintain quality campuses for a quality higher education system.

Included in the funding is:

Workforce Development: A more than $8 million increase in workforce development funding, including Career and Technical Education, Internships, Workforce 2020, and cutting-edge job placement technology for Job Service North Dakota.

Deferred Maintenance: $10.9 million for repairs and renovations on campuses, in addition to capital projects.

Helping Students and Families Afford College: A $4.1 increase for Student Financial Assistance Grants, scholarships and loans.

College Savings: In addition, BND has added new features to its CollegeSave Program that provides an income tax deduction and other incentives for higher education savings accounts to help families plan for the future, including a $250 state match for low-income individuals opening an account.

Technology: A $10.9 million increase for ConnectND, the Northern Tier Network, and other statewide general technology needs to keep our campuses competitive and cutting edge.

A $700,000 appropriation to tribal colleges to defray the cost of educating non-tribal students.
-###-