Wednesday, June 04, 2008

Democrats- See a Problem, Tax!

Lieberman-Warner Climate Tax Bill

Various analyses show that Lieberman-Warner would result in higher prices at the gas pump, between 41 cents and $1 per gallon by 2030. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says Lieberman-Warner would effectively raise taxes on Americans by more than $1 trillion over the next 10 years. The federal Energy Information Administration says the bill would result in a 9.5% drop in manufacturing output and higher energy costs.



Just add this to the "brillant solution" pile of junk the Dems like Dorgan (windfall profits tax) are proposing. One has to ask, do Democrats hate growth and progress?

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

In Case You Missed It

Is Obama Willing To Meet Ahmadinejad, But Not Petraeus?
By Jim Geraghty
The National Review’s Campaign Spot
May 28, 2008 9:47 AM
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTc4ZjBhMjYwOGU0N2RiMDgyMDBmODRiYjc3YWU4MTU=

Obama spokesman Bill Burton, responding to John McCain's suggestion that both he and Obama take a trip to Iraq in the near future:

"John McCain's proposal is nothing more than a political stunt, and we don't need any more 'Mission Accomplished' banners or walks through Baghdad markets to know that Iraq's leaders have not made the political progress that was the stated purpose of the surge. The American people don't want any more false promises of progress, they deserve a real debate about a war that has overstretched our military, and cost us thousands of lives and hundreds of billions of dollars without making us safer."

You know what is intriguingly missing from that answer? Any indication that Obama will return to Iraq before Election Day.

Obama has been to Iraq once, in 2006. It was a two-day tour of the country.

I suppose one can argue about the value of seeing the situation on the ground with one's own eyes, but wouldn't the architect of a withdrawal want to see some of the circumstances himself? Even if Obama didn't want to travel with McCain, is it really wise to suggest that a tour of post-surge Iraq is unnecessary? Wouldn't scheduling a visit defuse criticism like this from Vets for Freedom PAC?

And isn't Obama vulnerable to the argument that a man who's pledged to meet unconditionally, one-on-one, face-to-face with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad really ought to meet at least once one-on-one with Gen. David Petraeus?

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

McCain's commitment to the Judiciary

The North Dakota Republican Party commends Senator John McCain’s judicial philosophy and vision for the federal judiciary.
The next President will have the opportunity to nominate hundreds of men and women to the courts – the effects of which will last for many years. To uphold Republican ideals, it’s important that these judges have a proven record of judicial restraint to combat the judicial activism that currently is weakening our federal judiciary.
From the Supreme Court to lower courts, John McCain’s conservative leadership in nominating the right judges will bring about much-needed change to counteract judges who legislate from the bench and distort the Constitution.
________________________________________

JOHN MCCAIN ANNOUNCES HIS JUSTICE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
For Immediate Release Contact: Press Office
Tuesday, May 6, 2008 703-650-5550
ARLINGTON, VA -- Today, U.S. Senator John McCain announced his Justice Advisory Committee to the Campaign. Please find below the Chairs and members of the Committee:
Chairs Of The Justice Advisory Committee:
• Theodore B. Olson -- former Solicitor General of the United States
• Senator Sam Brownback -- United States Senator, Kansas
Steering Committee
• Michael Abramowicz -- Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School
• Hon. William P. Barr -- former Attorney General of the United States
• Gerard V. Bradley -- Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School
• Rachel Brand -- former Assistant Attorney General for Office of Legal Policy
• Steven Calabresi -- George C. Dix Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law
• Dean Ronald A. Cass -- Chairman, Center for the Rule of Law; Dean Emeritus, Boston University School of Law
• Senator Daniel Coats -- former United States Senator, Indiana
• Manus M. Cooney -- former Chief Counsel and Staff Director, U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary
• Charles J. Cooper -- former Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel
• Arthur B. Culvahouse, Jr. -- former White House Counsel to President Ronald Reagan
• Carol E. Dinkins -- Partner, Vinson & Elkins
• John F. Duffy -- Oswald Symister Colclough Research Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School
• Miguel A. Estrada -- former Assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States
• Charles Fried -- Beneficial Profes sor of Law, Harvard Law School; former Solicitor General of the United States
• Sandra S. Froman -- Arizona attorney
• Richard W. Garnett -- Professor of Law, Notre Dame Law School
• Robert P. George -- McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence, Princeton University
• Senator Lindsey Graham -- United States Senator, South Carolina
• Senator Phil Gramm -- former United States Senator, Texas
• Governor Frank Keating -- former Governor of Oklahoma
• Orin S. Kerr -- Professor, George Washington Universit y Law School
• Senator Jon Kyl -- United States Senator, Arizona
• Christopher Landau -- Partner, Kirkland & Ellis LLP
• Senator Trent Lott -- former United States Senator, Mississippi
• Randy Mastro -- former Deputy Mayor of New York City
• John O. McGinnis -- Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law
• Maureen E. Mahoney -- former Deputy Solicitor General of the Unites States
• Thomas W. Merrill -- Charles Keller Beekman Professor, Columbia Law School
• Marc L. Mukasey -- Partner, Bracewell & Giuliani LLP ; former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York
• Caleb Nelson -- Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law
• Eileen J. O'Connor -- former Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division, U.S. Department of Justice
• Hon. Thomas R. Phillips -- former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas
• Edward R. Reines -- Partner, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
• Kristi L. Remington -- former Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Legal Policy
• Professor Daniel B. Rodriguez -- Minerva House Drysdale Regents Chair in Law, The University of Texas at Austin Scho ol of Law
• Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz -- Associate Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
• Ronald D. Rotunda -- University Professor and Professor of Law, George Mason University
• Cathy Cleaver Ruse -- Senior Fellow for Legal Studies at the Family Research Council; Governor, Ave Maria School of Law
• Peter B. Rutledge -- Associate Professor of Law, University of Georgia School of Law
• Jon A. Sale -- former federal prosecutor for NY and Miami; former law professor, Nova Southeastern and St. Thomas
• John Smietanka -- former U.S. attorney
• Stephen F. Smith -- Professor of Law, John V. Ray Research Professor, University of Virginia School of Law
• George J. Terwilliger, III -- former Deputy Attorney General of the United States
• Senator Fred Thompson -- former United States Senator, Tennessee
• Eugene Volokh -- Gary T. Swartz Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law
• Dan K. Webb -- Chairman, Winston & Strawn; former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois
###

Monday, April 28, 2008

The end to our Mid-east Dependence

With all the oil development going on in North Dakota, Americans will be greatly benefitting from our own domestic reserves. But, we all know that our energy needs can not be met here in North Dakota alone. Enter Brazil.

New oil finds in Brazil could mean more and more oil on the market as well as a shake up in the Mid-east oil Cartel.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

OBAMA’S FALSE INTEGRETY ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT

BISMARCK, ND – North Dakota state leaders are calling into question some recent movements by Sen. Barack Obama to appear in greater favor of gun owner rights. State Representatives Al Carlson and Todd Porter have taken issue with the Democrat’s position.

“Sen. Obama is simply posturing to save face after his recent gaff attacking Second Amendment supporters. North Dakotans understand the great need for the Second Amendment, and is why I ask North Dakota Democrats to examine if Obama truly has the judgment to be Commander-In-Chief,” said Carlson.

Obama had recently made the statement saying that "they cling to guns and religion, and antipathy towards people that aren't like us" as a result of our "bitterness” referring to rural America.

Rep. Todd Porter has been a leader in the North Dakota House on gun owner rights. He has brought about legislation to ensure that homeowners can defend their homes and families without threat of lawsuit by criminals.

“It saddens me,” states Porter. “The thought that the work of the North Dakota legislature would be overturned by an out-of-state politician, such as Obama, really puts a blow to the Constitution and the Federal process.”




OBAMA HAS A LONG ANTI-GUN RECORD

OBAMA WANTS TO BAN MANY TYPES OF FIREARMS

Obama Has Come Out In Support Of Banning Handguns, Hunting Firearms And So-Called “Assault Weapons”:

In Response To A 1996 Independent Voters Of Illinois Questionnaire, Obama Indicated That He Supported Banning The “Manufacture, Sale And Possession Of Handguns.” Question: “Do you support state legislation to … ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns?” Obama’s Response: “Yes.” (Independent Voters Of Illinois Independent Precinct Organization 1996 General Candidate Questionnaire, Barack Obama Responses, 9/9/96)

• During 4/16 Dem. Debate, Obama Falsely Claimed His Handwriting Did Not Appear On Questionnaire. “Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., maintained at Wednesday’s ABC News debate in Philadelphia that his handwriting does not appear on a 1996 questionnaire stating support for a ban on the manufacture, sale, and possession of handguns. The Democratic presidential frontrunner made this claim even though a copy of the original document suggests otherwise. … When asked about the gun questionnaire with the handwriting on it, Obama adviser Robert Gibbs did not dispute that the writing was Obama’s.” (Teddy Davis and Talal Al-Khatib, “Obama Forgets Writing On Gun Questionnaire,” ABC News’ “Political Radar” Blog, www.abcnews.com, 4/16/08)

Scholar John Lott Recalls Obama Stating: “I Don’t Believe That People Should Be Able To Own Guns.” John Lott: “In fact, I knew Obama during the mid-1990s, and his answers to IVI’s question on guns fit well with the Obama that I knew. Indeed, the first time I introduced myself to him he said ‘Oh, you are the gun guy.’ I responded ‘Yes, I guess so.’ He simply responded that ‘I don’t believe that people should be able to own guns.’” (John R. Lott, Jr., “Obama And Guns: Two Different Views,” Fox News, www.foxnews.com, 4/7/08)

Obama Supported Banning “The Sale Or Transfer Of All Forms Of Semi-Automatic Weapons.” According to his responses to an Illinois State Legislative Election 1998 National Political Awareness Test, Obama pledged to “Ban the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons.” (Project Vote Smart Website, www.votesmart.org, Accessed 3/5/08)

In 2003, Obama Voted In Support Of Legislation That “Would Have Banned Most Of The Privately Held Hunting Shotguns, Target Rifles, And Black Powder Rifles” In Illinois. “[I]n 2003, Obama voted in support of SB1195, which, if passed, would have banned most of the privately held hunting shotguns, target rifles, and black powder rifles in the state. If the ban was enacted, law enforcement officials would have been authorized to forcibly enter private homes to confiscate newly banned firearms.” (Illinois State Rifle Association, “ISRA Blasts Candidate Obama On His Record Of Hostility Toward Law-Abiding Firearm Owners,” Press Release, 8/24/04)

In A 2004 Candidate Questionnaire, Obama Supported Banning So-Called “Assault Weapons.” Question: “Do you support legislation to ban the manufacture, sale and possession of … assault weapons?” Obama’s Response: “Yes.” (Lynn Sweet, “Obama’s 2003 IVI-IPO Questionnaire May Be Getting Closer Scrutiny,” Chicago Sun-Times’ “The Scoop From Washington” Blog, http://blogs.suntimes.com, 12/11/07)


OBAMA HAS TAKEN A NUMBER OF ANTI-GUN POSITIONS

Obama Has Received “F” Ratings From The National Rifle Association:

In 2004, 2002 And 1998, Obama Received “F” Ratings From The National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund. The NRA has given Obama 3 “F’s.” (National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund Website, www.nrapvf.org, Accessed 1/8/08; National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund Website, www.nrapvf.org, Accessed 1/8/08; 1998 Illinois National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund Political Preference Chart, p.2)


Obama Has A Long Anti-Gun Record:

Obama Wants To Turn Law-Abiding Gun Owners Who Are Victims Of Theft Into Felons. “Obama is proposing to make it a felony for a gun owner whose firearm was stolen from his residence which causes harm to another person if that weapon was not securely stored in that home.” (Chinta Strausberg, “Obama Unveils Federal Gun Bill,” Chicago Defender, 12/13/99)

In 2004, Obama Voted Against Self-Defense Rights. “[Obama] opposed letting people use a self-defense argument if charged with violating local handgun bans by using weapons in their homes. The bill was a reaction to a Chicago-area man who, after shooting an intruder, was charged with a handgun violation.” (“Obama Record May Be Gold Mine For Critics,” The Associated Press, 1/17/07)
Obama Pressed To Require Gun Owners To Supply Photos And Fingerprints To State Officials. “Sen. Barack Obama of Chicago called the Democrats’ proposed crackdown ‘not only constitutional, but eminently reasonable.’ … The proposals would: … Make gun owners apply in person for Firearm Owner Identification cards and supply their photos and fingerprints.” (Sean Noble, “Senate Democrats’ Proposals Take Aim At Weapons Control,” The [Springfield, IL] State Journal-Register, 2/15/01)

Running For The U.S. Senate In 2004, Obama Advocated National Gun-Control Legislation. “On the issue of prohibiting citizens from carrying concealed weapons, Obama said he believes national legislation should be passed to ‘prevent other states’ laws [allowing citizens to conceal their guns] from threatening the safety of Illinois residents.’” (John Chase, “Keyes, Obama Are Far Apart On Guns,” Chicago Tribune, 9/15/04)

Obama Has Expressed His Opposition To Concealed Carry. Obama: “I mean, I am consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry.” (David Mendell, “Obama Has Center In His Sights,” Chicago Tribune, 4/27/04)

In 2001, Obama Voted Against A Bill To Allow Individuals To Carry A Concealed Weapon When They Have A Valid Order Of Protection Out Against Another Person. (S.B. 604, Senate Floor Third Reading, Failed, 29-27-0, 4/4/01, Obama Voted Nay)

Obama Believes The DC Gun Ban Is Constitutional. “Obama believes the D.C. handgun law is constitutional.” (James Oliphant and Michael J. Higgins, “Court To Hear Gun Case,” Chicago Tribune, 11/20/07)

In 2005, Obama Voted Twice To Hold Manufacturers, Distributors, Dealers And Importers Of Firearms And Ammunition Liable For The Acts Of Criminals. (S. 397, CQ Vote #206: Motion Agreed To 66-32: R 53-1; D 13-30; I 0-1, 7/26/05, Obama Voted Nay; S. 397, CQ Vote #219: Passed 65-31: R 50-2; D 14-29; I 1-0, 7/29/05, Obama Voted Nay)


- END -

Friday, April 11, 2008

GOP in the Valley

Well its been a while since I gave an update of what I have been doing. So here we go.

What a tremendous State Convention we had in Fargo. The enthusiasm was very high and we nominated a fantasic slate of Candidates. Brian Kalk is going to be our next Public Sevice Commissioner.

Since the completion of the state convention, we have been having district endorsing conventions throughout the state. We have some of the best candidates we have ever put forward in recent times. I really want to thank everyone that has stepped forward and made the commitment to their district and state.

At these endorsing conventions we are seeing huge turnouts. District 26 held their convention in Oaks and over 120 people showed to have dinner and endorse Nell Walstead, Jiggs Dyste, and Gary Schnell for the legislature. These are three teriffic candidates that will win.

In Mayville, District 20 endorsed Marty Johnson, Jake Holm and Larry O'Brien as their candidates. This is a truly diverse slate of candidates that bring knowledge, experience and enthusiasm to the ticket. A great crowd showed up for what is the first major Republican event in this district in far too long.

District 24 endorsed Dwight Grotberg, Jon Wager and Dwight Kiefert as their choice and a tightly packed room was very much ready to see a change in leadership. Earlier in the year they held a Lincoln Day dinner that had about 80 people present.

Up in District 16 we had a fantasitic crowd of 75plus present to endorse myself, Joe Miller, Phyllis Schindele, and Rep. Joyce Kingsbury. It was so much fun and thank to Brian Kalk for coming.

So as you can see the Party is really getting strong and there is a lot of excitment out there for Republicans. Democrats may have their millions in out-of-state money but we have real support where it counts!

Tuesday, April 01, 2008

McCain Running Strongly In Some Key Democratic States

From CQ Politics

By CQ Staff
March 31, 2008

Arizona Sen. John McCain is running strongly in three states that have been solidly Democratic in recent presidential elections; a particular surprise is New Jersey where, a month ago, New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton had a double-digit lead, according to a new round of state-by-state general election match-ups.

The series of polls by Rasmussen Reports, which included Michigan and Washington State, also underscored what most other national and state polling has found - high negatives for Clinton as far as favorability ratings. McCain often scores the highest favorability ratings ...

Rasmussen says McCain and the Democrats are in a statistical tie in New Jersey, with McCain leading Clinton 45 percent to 42 percent and Obama by 46 percent to 45 percent, with a 4 point margin of error. ...

McCain is also running a close race with the Democrats in Michigan, according to the Rasmussen survey conducted March 25. He leads Obama 43 percent to 42 percent, and Clinton by 45 percent to 42 percent, with a 4.5 percent margin of error.

McCain is viewed favorably by 55 percent of voters, Obama by 50 percent and Clinton by 47 percent. This is a state the Democrats have carried in the last four elections. It is also one of the two states (the other being Florida) where the controversy continues over the Democratic Party's decision to strip both of their delegates for breaking party rules by moving up the dates of their primaries. ...

And in Washington State, Rasmussen finds McCain is competitive with both Democrats, according to a poll conducted March 27. ... [M]cCain leads Clinton 46 percent to 43 percent. ... The last time a Republican won this state was in the Ronald Reagan landslide of 1984. ...

To View The Entire Article

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

In Obama's New Message, Some Foes See Old Liberalism

From The Washington Post

By Alec MacGillis
March 26, 2008

[A]s Obama heads into the final presidential primaries, Sen. John McCain and other Republicans have already started to brand him a standard-order left-winger, "a down-the-line liberal," as McCain strategist Charles R. Black Jr. put it, in a long line of Democratic White House hopefuls.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign has also started slapping the L-word on Obama, warning that his appeal among moderate voters will diminish as they become more aware of liberal positions he took in the past, such as calling for single-payer health care and an end to the U.S. embargo against Cuba. ...

The double-barreled attack has presented Democratic voters with some persistent questions about Obama: Just how liberal is he? ...

In most major areas, Obama has taken positions that would seem to conform to the Republican stereotype of a liberal. Like Clinton, he favors expanding the government's role in delivering health care ... He would go a step further than Clinton by lifting the limit on income taxed for Social Security, now $100,000, to set that program on firm footing.

He strongly supports abortion rights and spoke out against a Supreme Court ruling last year that upheld a ban on the procedure that some call "partial-birth" abortion. He favors allowing illegal immigrants to get driver's licenses (after some hesitation, Clinton came out against that). He is outspoken on civil rights, and he has opposed Bush's judicial picks, staying out of a bipartisan effort to approve some nominees. ... [A]s a Senate candidate in 2004 he expressed support for strict gun control, decriminalizing marijuana and ending federal mandatory minimum prison sentences, issues he now rarely raises on the trail. ...

[H]e has opened the door to Republican caricature with his call to negotiate with hostile governments, and has been endorsed by the activist group MoveOn.org. ...

But whatever Obama's motivation, [American Enterprise Institute's Andrew] Biggs said, his platform is still liberal. "He's taken all these left-wing positions, and how do you get out of it later?" he said. "He doesn't have the appearance of a tax-and-spend liberal . . . but if the essence of being a tax-and-spend liberal is a lot of taxes and spending, that's what he comes down to." ...

To View The Entire Article, Please Visit:

Thursday, March 20, 2008

McCain Now Leads

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows John McCain’s lead growing against both potential Democratic opponents. McCain currently leads Barack Obama 49% to 42% and Hillary Clinton 51% to 41% margin (see recent daily results).


This is good news for Republicans nationwide. This means the tide is turning against the inaction and lies of the Democrats. Americans know who they can trust and better ideas for leading country come from Republicans. The Democrats said they would end earmarks and reign in spending, and they haven't.

The North Dakota delegation with their Democrat collegues in Congress have not been able to pass a farm bill, have failed to bring real solutions for winning the war, and insist on raising taxes while increasing spending. The obivious conclusion is THEY ARE NOT FIT TO LEAD!

Monday, March 17, 2008

Under The Radar, Some Positive Polling

From U.S. News & World Report

By Kenneth T. Walsh
March 14, 2008

White House strategists are feeling a new rush of optimism about President Bush's remaining 10 months in office. ... [A] new internal Republican poll, obtained by U.S. News, which indicates that ... some of his major policies have become quite popular. If Bush and his surrogates can make the policies better known, GOP strategists believe that will lift not only Bush's approval ratings but the overall standing of his party. ...

GOP pollster Ed Goeas of the Tarrance Group [writes] ... "Fully 56 percent of likely voters approve of the president personally, driven by voter sentiments that he is a person of strong moral character and integrity,"...

About 64 percent of likely voters approve of Bush's economic stimulus package passed earlier this year; 67 percent back his initiatives to help struggling homeowners survive the current mortgage crisis; 70 percent endorse his plan to allow monitoring of foreign communications of suspected terrorists; and 72 percent back his visit to the Mideast to promote peace. In addition, 52 percent approve of his surge of U.S. troops into Iraq. ...

To View The Entire Article, Please Visit: http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/politics/2008/03/14/under-the-radar-some-positive-polling_print.htm

Dorgan's Numbers

The Ethics of Dorgan and the 5.6 Trillion

Friday, March 14, 2008

Conrad's Numbers

Here is are a couple presentation by a concerned citizen on Conrad's rhetoric about the Bush Administration.

Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND) - Ethics - $5.6 Trillion Surplus

Democratic Response to Bush Budget Analyzed - 2

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Dorgan supported the War, but thats about it!

Agree or disagree with the war, (Senator Dorgan agreed with it before he disagreed with it) we know the troop surge has been effective. We also know that the Iraqis are making slow but sure progress.



Now this next video is apparently from some left-wing group, but I find what Senator Dorgan is saying to be a little ridiculous.



The soldier in the video is simply advocating we stay the course and win the war. That fighting our enemies in Iraq is better than them coming here. He did not, as Senator Dorgan insists, suggest that Saddam Hussien attacked us. What the video suggests is that old policies had failed and America can no longer allow dangerous regimes to threaten our nation and allies.

The truth is we need to succeed in Iraq, and simple rhetoric from Dorgan doesn't do anything to help that. If he has a better plan to win, let's hear it.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Who is Jack Murtha?

Pomeroy Votes to Divert Intellegence Funding for "Climate Change"

Rep. Earl Pomeroy joined a choir of liberal Democrats in voting to strip our nation's intellegence funding and put it into pet projects, including useless studies on climate change.

Pomeroy joined support of Jack Murtha's proposal to fund a bloated agency with a $40 million annual budget and funding for studies measuring the risk of "global warming" on national security.(House Roll Call 117).

Earl Pomeroy's record has continually moved leftward as the longer he is in Washington. The saga continues of doing one thing in Washington and saying another in North Dakota, but now Pomeroy is ignoring very important intellegnce legislation and favoring expensive yet ineffective pet projects.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

True Character

Conrad, Dorgan and Pomeroy are Gearing-up to Raise Your Taxes

It’s a funny thing how a politician can continually rest on the belief that he is a “fiscal hawk” but yet endorse huge spending increases, huge tax increases, and still fail to balance the budget. Democrats campaigned on change in 2006 and still campaign on change today.

Yeah, I think we do need change!

We need to change Washington and eliminate the continuation of these empty promises from our congressional delegation. The Democrats have failed to address any of the problems they said they would and today, under their congressional leadership, we have rising energy and food costs; a grim housing market; and more and more restriction on our private property rights.

Recently we have seen the Democrats reveal their new killer dog, the 2008 budget. If unleashed, it will:

• Raise taxes on the average tax payer of North Dakota by $2,614
• Will be the largest tax hike in American History
• 6 million current tax exempt Americans will receive a tax penalty
• Will not fix the AMT (Alternative Minimum Tax)
• Imposes huge spending increases
• More bankrupting entitlement programs
• Increases Debt
• Fails to adequately fund the troops

The Democrats cannot be trusted. Our congressman joined in a unanimous vote against a moratorium on earmarks, directly going against the campaign rhetoric of the 2006 Democrat campaign.

Learn more here.

Thursday, March 06, 2008

Who is better for the economy?

Go to this link and tell me who really stands up for the lower and middle classs.

Meanwhile you have Democrats like, Kent Conrad, proposing spending increase and tax hikes on all Americans.

Can America afford the Democrat Party?

Tuesday, March 04, 2008

McCain Can!

From The Washington Post
Peter Slevin
Mar 4, 2008

The cheer went up at 8:05 p.m. Lone Star time, when CNN called Texas -- and the Republican nomination -- for Sen. John McCain. Eight years after he lost a presidential race, and eight months after his campaign was given up for dead, he earned a trip to the finals...

"They are liberal Democrats. I am a conservative Republican," McCain said. "Whether we want the government to take more of your money or whether families will spend that money...Whether we will declare surrender in Iraq, set a date for withdrawal, or we will continue the surge that has succeeded."


Senator John McCain has secured the nomination for President. Mike Huckabee has bowed out after a long and hard fought race. Republicans are now charged with pulling together and defeating the left. Let's not waiver and let's win.

Monday, March 03, 2008

Conrad’s Fiscal Credibility in Question

A cord has been struck! Senator Kent Conrad’s response to Renae Michell’s letter, “Debt has a Moral Dimension” was an interesting response to what was a direct question. Foremost Conrad failed to answer Mitchell’s questions and concerns.

The national debt needs to become an issue that Americans take seriously, but we need to understand what the concerns are and why we need to resolve them in a timely manner. Shifting blame to others does not solve the issue, and words cannot rectify our deficits. Real commitment on all budgetary issues is what is needed. However, Senator Conrad says one thing and does another.

Conrad says “addressing (federal debt) has been one of the central tenets of my Senate career”, but has continually opposed the Balanced Budget Amendment and the Line Item Veto. He says “everything would be on the table” when addressing fiscal issues, yet he opposed limits on the amounts of direct payments a farm may receive- a measure that was sponsored by Senator Dorgan and would greatly benefit young farmers in North Dakota.

Introducing a bill in Congress can’t serve as excuse for action. A man in Senator Conrad’s position doesn’t need permission from the entire Congress and the President to begin task forces and bring people together for the sake our country. True leaders don’t sit on the sidelines and wait for something to happen they make things happen now. The nation’s debt has been lingering for a great number of years and there needs to an accountability held by the voters to elect people that want correct the problem rather than just give it lip service.

Conrad also found it necessary to attack President Bush and the tax cuts the Congress enacted under his administration. It seems dishonest for the Senator to insist that allowing over-taxed taxpayers to keep more of their money is contributing to the deficit. Only over-spending by the government contributes to deficits. The Congress knows what its revenues are when they make a budget. If there is going to be less money, there needs to be less spending.

One’s words lose creditability when they preach about fiscal restraint but then lend support to a person, such as Barack Obama, that pushes for a near trillion dollar increase in spending from the US treasury to UN programs. Senator Conrad needs to be honest with himself and the people of North Dakota, and bring real action on deficit and debt relief.

Merle Boucher Unaware of Progress in North Dakota

In a recent videotaped interview with editor of the Bismarck Tribune, Democrat Gubernatorial candidate Merle Boucher displayed his lack of knowledge of the progress that North Dakota has made under strong Republican leadership. In this instance Boucher stated that “the economy is robust at the present time, our tax collections are very robust and yet at the same time our numbers of people aren’t growing.”

Boucher is either ignorant of the facts, or he is purposely trying to mislead the people of North Dakota. In either case, Boucher does not display the qualities that the people of North Dakota expect in their political leaders.

When it comes to population, the fact is that the decades old trend of population loss has turned around. In fact, since 2003 our state’s population has risen by more than 6,500 people. Last year alone the population increased by 2,255 people.

Republicans have helped the state to grow and diversify its economy leading to a growth of more than 30,000 new jobs since 2000. Our wages and incomes are rising faster than the national average. And, our economy continues to grow by more than $1 billion per year.

Boucher’s recent attempts to deny the truth show that the only hope the Democrats have is to hide the facts about our state’s progress.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Don't Miss Statewide Lincoln Day Dinner with Governor John Hoeven

Tomorrow is the Statewide Lincoln Day Dinner featuring Governor Hoeven as the guest speaker. You may still buy tickets for this event - Call Headquarters at 701.255.0030 and ask for Darcy.

The Lincoln Day Dinner will be held at the Ramkota Hotel in Bismarck
Social begins at 5:30 pm with Dinner at 6:30.
Tickets are $30, or buy a table for $240

See you there!

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Is this Fiscally Responsible?

Recently Senator Kent Conrad had this letter in the Fargo Forum. A response to a letter critical of him for supporting Obama. In it Conrad claims Obama has a long term plan to resolve national debt.

President leaves nation deep in debt
Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D. Washington
Opinion - 02/25/2008

Renae Mitchell’s letter, “Debt has a moral dimension,” (Feb. 16) is correct to raise alarm bells about our growing federal debt. I share her concerns. That is why I have been warning about the threat of debt for years. In fact, addressing this issue has been one of the central tenets of my Senate career.

Unfortunately, the next president is going to inherit a fiscal mess from President Bush. His deficit-financed tax cuts and deficit-financed Iraq war spending have exploded our national debt at the worst possible time -- just as the baby boom generation is beginning to retire. In the years ahead, the combination of the baby boom retirement and rising health-care costs will further raise our national debt to an unsustainable level.


In response, most recently, I have introduced a bipartisan fiscal task force bill along with my Republican counterpart on the Senate Budget Committee, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H. Our bill would create a bipartisan panel of lawmakers and administration officials tasked with crafting a legislative proposal that would address the long-term imbalance between federal spending and revenues. Everything would be on the table. The task force’s proposal would be considered on a fast-track basis and, unlike other commissions, would require an up-or-down vote by Congress.


My concern about debt and our long-term outlook is one of the chief reasons why I support Sen. Barack Obama’s candidacy. Obama is committed to confronting our long-term fiscal challenges and, importantly, supports the general approach of my bipartisan fiscal task force bill. We need a president who won’t be afraid to make the tough choices that lay ahead. Obama is the best candidate to put our country back on a sound fiscal course.


An alarming and unknown peice of legislation that is making its way through the Congress in a stealthy manner is this Gobal Poverty Act S. 2344 sponsored by Senator Barack Obama.

An Accuracy in Media article discuss the fiscal impact of the bill.

A nice-sounding bill called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations.

Senator Joe Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has not endorsed either Senator Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton in the presidential race. But on Thursday, February 14, he is trying to rush Obama's "Global Poverty Act" (S.2433) through his committee. The legislation would commit the U.S. to spending 0.7 percent of gross national product on foreign aid, which amounts to a phenomenal 13-year total of $845 billion over and above what the U.S. already spends.

Obama’s Global Tax Proposal Up for Senate Vote -Cliff Kincaid February 12, 2008


This is truly alarming and completely fiscally irresponsible for our nation to begin such an incredible financial commitment to the United Nations. In addition, this give a substantial amount of power to the UN.

This bill is heralded as Obama's hallmark legislation, and is really the only significant piece of legislation that Obama has had his name attached too. This is pretty telling of Obama's real philosophy and true left leanings. It also calls into question Senator Conrad's supposed commitment to national debt stablization and relief.

Monday, February 25, 2008

Olafson, Damschen, and Monson Endorsed by District 10 Republicans

CAVALIER, ND- Following the Feb. 5th Super Tuesday Caucus in Cavalier, Sen. Curtis Olafson, Rep. Chuck Damschen, and Rep. David Monson all received the District 10 Republican Party endorsement for the 2008 legislative election.

Sen. Olafson is from rural Mountain and is a partner in a family business with interests in farming, ranching and earthmoving construction. Olafson was appointed to the Senate in December of 2006 to fill the remainder of the term of former Sen. Tom Trenbeath, who accepted the position of Chief Deputy Attorney General. Olafson was named the 2007 “Legislator of the Year” by the North Dakota Township Officers Association, being the first time a freshman legislator was honored with the award. Olafson is married to Bjork Eiriksdottir, a native of Iceland, and has two children and three step-children.

Rep. Chuck Damschen, a farmer near Hampden, is seeking his second term of office. Damschen has served on the House Agriculture and Human Services committees bringing experience and knowledge to the table in an even-headed and direct manner. His service in the legislature, as well as on several community boards, has greatly benefited the area. Damschen is Vice Chairman of the Natural Resources committee and received the “Board Award” from the North Dakota Hunter Educators Association. He and his wife, Alice, have three children.

Rep. David Monson, a farmer and school teacher from the Osnabrock area, is the current House Assistant Majority Leader. In his position as assistant leader and on the House Appropriations committee, Monson has worked to bring commonsense solutions to funding issues that deal with everything from education to agriculture. Monson has been a strong leader at the fore front of the legalization of industrial hemp. He is committed to removing restrictions that tie the hands of North Dakota’s farmers and industries. He and his wife, Mary, have three children.

District 10 GOP Chairman, Steve Holm, believes that this team will not only win in November but will deliver for Northeastern North Dakota.

“I feel our legislators have shown they are competent, proven leaders, and they have continually demonstrated their abilities to bring new ideas and critical thought to the legislative process,” said Holm.

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

GOP in the Valley

The District 12 and 29 Republicans (Jamestown, Verona and Carrington) held their annual Lincoln Day Dinner this last Saturday in Jamestown. It was a very well attended event with over 100 people present. Governor Hoeven and First Lady Mikey were the Guests of Honor. In addition all of those running for statewide office were present and gave campaign updates. Senator Dave Nething made it official that he is seeking another term in the state Senate. Congratulations to Delores Rath, Tom Christensen and all those involved in making that night a success.

The District 24 Republicans held their Lincoln Day Dinner in Valley City at Sabir's Restaurant. Another well attended event with about 70 folks out for the evening. Lt. Governor Jack Dalrymple and his wife Betsy were present and the Lt. Governor gave the keynote address. Dalrymple emphasized the importance of supporting our candidates and the excitement behind the Public Service Commission race. Chairman Ed Kuhlmann and the district leaders should be proud of the successful evening.

Clearly the GOP is experiencing excitement and promise. Our leaders are committed to good government and winning elections, and with leaders like Delores Rath, Tom Christiansen, and Ed Kuhlmann we will see victory in November. If you have never been involved before, the time is now to get involved. Don't let opportunity pass you by, these elections are important. Become a delegate, a candidate, a volunteer, or a donor and increase your impact on your community and party. Democracy depends on individuals being leaders and participating in the discussion of things that matter and impact our daily lives. Get involved today!

Joe Miller

Deputy Director-Valley Region

Contact me at joe.miller@ndgop.org

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Republican for a Reason

In the spirit of the President's Day weekend let's remember why we are Republicans!

Thursday, February 14, 2008

GOP in the Valley

Work is carrying on as we have moved passed the Super Tuesday Caucus. Republicans in North Dakota seem very charged up and ready to get their hands dirty. I have been traveling to various meetings up and down the Valley the past few weeks. Most recently I was in Grand Forks for the district nominating convention. This convention is for the nomination of delegates to the state convention March 28th-30th in Fargo. There was a great turnout of folks for this event. Governor Hoeven, Insurance Commissioner Hamm, Public Service Commissioner Candidates Risher, Stenehjem, and Kalk, and several legislators from the city were all present. District 42 and Region II chairman, Jerry Youngberg, presided over the event in the absence of the Grand Forks Coordinating Committee Chair, Jim Holdman who was out of town. There is a renewed spirit in Grand Forks and an enthusiasm that will be the tides of victory come November.

I have been speaking to many legislators and legislative candidates for the past month. They are all ready to hit the campaign trail hard to spread the good word of the North Dakota economy and how North Dakotan’s are responsible for it. North Dakota Republicans have a lot to point to for accomplishments over the past few sessions. They have created budget stabilization funds, held the line on taxes and delivered for needed changes in infrastructure in our roads, schools and universities.

Democrats have been trying to politicize the WSI issue for more than a year now. Every time a concern of theirs is addressed they change the issue. The current state of the Democrats mantra of talking points has changed so much from its original point that I wonder if they even know what they are saying anymore. Obviously Merle Boucher, House Minority Leader and Democrat Gubernatorial Candidate, has forgotten what the role of the governor is in Workforce Safety and Insurance. He pressed the Governor to fire the WSI board, even though the Governor has little to no authority over the WSI board. I would think a person that is a Democrat Party Leader would understand how WSI functions, being that is the only issue they talk about, wouldn’t you?

A very recent Democrat attack came lobbed from the Executive Director, Jamie Selzler. He shamefully accused Commissioner Hamm of raising rates on health insurance and of “re-hashing” their candidate’s ideas on how to address WSI. The fact is, just saying things should change is not a plan. Giving lip service to the problem will not make it go away. Republicans are finding real solutions to the problems of our state, they have been for years. Hamm made well defined proposals to give his department some oversight on WSI. The Democrats have offered nothing in terms of real plans.

Here in the Valley, Republicans are on the move, Republicans are ready to work.

Joe Miller, Deputy Director-Valley Region
Reach me at joe.miller@ndgop.org

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Adam Hamm Makes It Official

Today North Dakota Insurance Commissioner Adam Hamm formally announced he would seek a 4 year term for the office he currently holds. Joined by his fiancée Michelle and her 2 children, Hamm outlined his accomplishments and what he will focus on in the future.

“I traveled extensively during the open enrollment period for Medicare Part D helping seniors obtain assistance with their prescription drug coverage,” stated Hamm. “And, I am happy to report that earlier this week my department sent the final check to the city of Northwood to complete the nearly 8 million dollar agreement, allowing them to move forward with their plans for a new school.”

Hamm also spoke of his detailed proposal for Workforce Safety and Insurance that would allow the Insurance Department to play a specialized and necessary role in bringing long term accountability to that agency. (This proposal was outlined at press conferences in Fargo and Bismarck last week.)

Hamm pledged that he would continue to focus on consumer protection as his number one priority. “I will work hard over the next four years to ensure that North Dakotans have the protection and advocacy they deserve,” he said.

Hamm also promised to build on the Insurance Department’s success with the State Health Insurance Counseling program and Prescription Connection for North Dakota. “These programs have been extremely important in helping seniors and the disabled with insurance issues and with helping connect people with free or discounted prescription drugs directly from the manufacturer,” Hamm stated.

Lastly, Hamm pledged to take a leadership role on healthcare including: working to see appropriate reimbursements across the board; promoting personal wellness; and encouraging competition. “I’ll work to ensure good quality healthcare across all of North Dakota,” he said.

Hamm concluded his announcement by promising to never forget the lesson he learned growing up in North Dakota: “We can achieve anything with hard work and a commitment to each other”.

Correction Noted

A very alert Dale Wetzel noted that there were actually about 9000 voters in the 2000 Republican Caucus. My sources were incorrect and I appreciate Dale setting me straight!

Gary Emineth, Chairman of the North Dakota Republican Party

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Forum Perspective on GOP Caucuses Flawed, Ridiculous

In a Feb. 7 editorial The Forum characterized Republicans as being lethargic, with nothing to smile about. Nothing could be further from the truth. There is a lot of energy and enthusiasm in Republican ranks; the numbers themselves speak volumes.

Another perspective on the caucus turnout is the Democrats had a poor turnout. If you compare the Democrats’ six hours versus Republican’s 90 minutes and 50 percent more polling places, they should have had 60,000 voters rather than 19,000.

Obviously that is a ridiculous comparison, just as The Forum’s perspective was ridiculous. A caucus is a meeting of party members to select delegates in a nominating process. State law provides for each party to determine their own rules for their caucus. Democrats had more of a primary caucus as opposed to the Republicans’ format with a rally and a shorter window for voting.

The voter turnout at the Republican caucus doubled the previous high in 2000. This caucus is the first competitive one for Republicans since its inception in 2000.

Now that Gov. Mitt Romney has stepped out of the ring, it’s a chance for Republicans across the state to regroup and get ready for round 2.

It’s obvious from the balanced support garnered by at least three of the four candidates, even folks out here in North Dakota, where change isn’t embraced quite as readily as it may be in larger population centers, are still asking to be heard.

Take Mike Huckabee’s 20 percent to Ron Paul’s 21 percent of the totals. Huckabee held his own against an admirable effort by Paul’s supporters. Paul’s strong views on such issues as personal liberty, less government and protection of the Constitution obviously resonate with many North Dakotans.

The Forum’s swipe at Huckabee with reference to his former occupation as a pastor, rather than commenting on his proven record as a governor of Arkansas for more than 10 years, incidentally from the same state as Bill Clinton, is a cheap shot. Huckabee was an effective administrator with integrity who has a consistent record of supporting conservative philosophies and values across the board. As a friend of mine said after he heard Huckabee articulate his strong moral values, “He sounds like he really believes it.” The last time I checked, his values are consistent with those held in high regard by a majority of Americans.

Paul made a visit to college campuses in Bismarck and Fargo. These were attended by more than 1,200 students and others. College Republican President Erik Nygren had this to say: “He (Paul) has the Young Republicans in North Dakota flying high. The Paul event was the largest CR event in history.” Bring it on!

As for Sen. John McCain, he is a solid candidate – a seasoned veteran in every way, unlike anyone on the Democratic side of the aisle in this contest, McCain will be ready to lead on day one. There will be no need for on-the-job training. McCain, while perceived as a maverick, has one of the highest conservative rankings in the Senate. He won’t be intimidated or buckle under to the likes of Iran, North Korea or even the liberal elements of the United Nations or U.S. Congress.

When the rallies and parades are over and the confetti is swept from the convention floors, two candidates – one Democrat and one Republican – will be left standing. In the end, the only vote that will matter is the general election. I’m willing to predict that Americans in North Dakota and across this country will fall in behind a man who has been in the trenches before and can lead us forward in the 21st century.

It’s the votes cast on general election day in November that matter now.

Gary Emineth, Chairman of the North Dakota Republican Party.

Friday, February 08, 2008

North Dakota is Right on Track

The news of North Dakota’s growing population is just another indicator of the success the state is experiencing in work force and economic development. It is a pleasure to note that the growth is statewide and that a majority of the growth is made up of younger workers who are either returning home to North Dakota or coming to the state to pursue some of the many opportunities we have to offer.

The news, however, shouldn’t be surprising considering the number of studies that have placed North Dakota cities or the entire state in its top rankings of places to do business or live. Under Gov. John Hoeven’s leadership these last seven years, North Dakota has fostered a productive climate for businesses that has attracted a number of high-profile companies like Micro-soft and has helped our own homegrown businesses flourish. This business-friendly environment will only help bring in more lucrative career and job opportunities to the state. And, of course, with the high paying jobs, we’ll also be able to keep more of our young people stay in North Dakota to live, work and raise their families.

North Dakota’s booming economy is not the only indicator of this. A study done by the Beacon Hill Index ranks North Dakota fourth in its State Competitiveness Report, which attempts to identify the qualities that allow some areas to excel in income generation and thus compete economically, sustain a high level of per capita income and continue economic growth. The rankings are based on the state’s government and fiscal policies, security, infrastructure, human resources, technology, business incubation, openness and environmental policy. North Dakota ranks high in a majority of these categories, and in areas where there is room for improvement. Hoeven and his administration are already working hard to make North Dakota more competitive.

North Dakota has steadily risen in this report and with the continued efforts of the current administration, we can expect North Dakota to reach to top.

Dale Anderson
Fargo, N.D.

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

North Dakota Republican Presidential Caucus Results

BISMARCK, ND – The North Dakota Republican Party announces the statewide results for the 2008 Presidential Preference Caucus:

Governor Mitt Romney 36%
Senator John McCain 23%
Ron Paul 21%
Governor Mike Huckabee 20%
Alan Keyes 0

9785 votes were cast

This means the following number of delegates goes to each candidate:

Governor Mitt Romney 8
Senator John McCain 5
Ron Paul 5
Governor Mike Huckabee 5


North Dakota has 26 delegates: 23 are pledged tonight, 3 will remain uncommitted. In order to receive any delegates, a candidate must have received at least 15% of the Caucus vote. Each candidate receives a proportional number of delegates based on the percentage of total votes received.

Monday, February 04, 2008

What choice do they have?

The Democrat party has just come to face to face with reality, and they are scrambling. Their frightening reality is the specter of the Hillary train roaring down upon them and they are tied to the rails. This train has been coming for 8 years--it’s what they worked and wished for--and right on schedule and no surprise to anyone. The scramble to untie themselves from the track has taken frantic to near panic activity. The first of our tone-deaf representatives in Washington D.C. to cut the knots and abandon the Hillary Express is Senator Conrad who has put his stamp of approval on Barack Obama in an often run TV ad for Obama, and now he has authored a middle-page opinion piece in the Fargo Forum of Feb. 4. Conrad says Obama is best suited to unite our country and lead us to face these challenges. He tells us Obama is honest; it’s plain to see why Conrad would make that statement as a cloud of suspicion and indictments have hung over the Clintons, Hillary and Bill both, since their days in Arkansas.

On Feb. 1 Rep. Earl Pomeroy cut the bonds and jumped the tracks--he too came out for Obama saying that he has demonstrated rare capacity for leadership that you don’t often see…I am very excited about what he offers. The question to be asked is what is the “capacity for leadership” and what it is it that he “offers”? He is a 4 year senator--never has run anything, worked in public funded programs, and then sat in public paid offices. One has to ask the question, “Is this the man who may come face to face with the world’s most ruthless dictators to talk the hard talk of peace?” Is America to put its fate in the hands of a man with 4 years experience in the U.S. Senate--a shared responsibility with 99 others? A man with no accomplishments other than getting elected?

The Democrat party still harbors deep seated guilt over the bad behavior of president Clinton and Hillary in their 8 years in the White House. They know, too, it was 8 years wasted and squandered--a time when freedom could have been advanced, terrorism could have been checked, social programs could have been repaired--it was an opportunity for America. It was an opportunity lost and Conrad and Pomeroy know this.
The choice made by Conrad and Pomeroy was between the devil they know (Hillary) and the unknown who comes with no leadership record and possesses only oratory skills. They have picked oratory--a good talker. America deserves better!

Hal Neff Bismarck

Saturday, February 02, 2008

Additional Predictions from Punxsutawney Phil

Punxsutawney Phil saw his shadow and predicted that we will have six more weeks of winter. Phil has been unaware of the current state of the presidential race since he has been hibernating all winter. Upon learning that John McCain was now the Republican frontrunner with Mitt Romney nipping at his heals and Barack Hussein Obama was closing the gap on Mrs. Bill Clinton's lead, Phil made a few addtional predictions.
  1. Bill Clinton will continue to put his foot in his mouth and draw attention to himself as oppose to his wife.
  2. Barack Obama will adopt John Edward's campaign strategy and begin promising everything to everyone.
  3. There will be a race between Clinton and Obama to see who can cut-and-run faster from the War on Terror.
  4. Political pundits will continue to explain why things are occuring the way they are and try to explain how this really is what they thought would happen all along.
  5. Hillary will realize her true calling and become a Flight Attendant.
  6. Obama's campaign for change will become reality when he adopts the Salvation Army's kettle campaign strategy.
  7. Not to be out done, Bill and Hillary go back to their roots and begin playing guitar and singing on street corners in San Francisco.
  8. Obama turns down Ted Kennedy's invitation to drive his campaign bus.
  9. Democrats begin a campaign to raise taxes believing it will help the economy
  10. Republicans shed the Democratic attacks and mistruths, win in November.

Thursday, January 31, 2008

Update on Ron Paul Events

1. Rally at North Dakota State University
Grand Ballroom in the Student Union
Fargo, North Dakota
Monday, February 4th, 1:00 pm. (Media availability 1:45-2:00pm)

2. Rally at the Elks Lodge
900 S. Washington St.Bismarck, ND 58504
Monday, February 4th, 3:30 pm. (Media availability 4:15-4:40pm)

"The Fargo Republican" gives an opinion on ND owned refinery

Read what "The Fargo Republican" has to say!: http://fargorepublican.blogspot.com/2008/01/lets-talk-nd-owned-oil-refineries.html

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Ron Paul to visit Bismarck and Fargo

Ron Paul will be the second Presidential Candidate to visit North Dakota this year. You can see him at Bismarck State College at 9 am or in Fargo at 12:00 Noon at a location yet to be announced.

Monday, January 28, 2008

FISA Fight Continues

One week from today, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) will expire unless Congress passes a new version that President Bush is willing to sign. If it expires, our intelligence gatherers here and abroad will be rendered blind and deaf because the legality of their operations will be put in limbo.

As CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden said, terrorists are in a Darwinian era: we’re only capturing the dumb ones. If we’re going to catch the smart ones -- and thwart their plans -- we need more and better intelligence. Why, then, are the Democrats insisting on hobbling intelligence gathering by insisting on a more restrictive FISA?

FISA -- which dates back to the Carter administration -- is a law that is supposed to govern how intelligence agencies collect data on foreign agents in the United States. Though the President has Constitutional authority to do this outside of the framework of FISA, President Bush chose last year to submit the National Security Agency’s terrorist surveillance program to FISA limitations when the existence of the highly classified program was leaked to and published by the New York Times.

Last May, the FISA court issued a secret decision that imposed new limitations on gathering foreign intelligence that caused a crisis for NSA, CIA and the other intelligence agencies. In one reported incident, the new restrictions caused a nine-hour delay in gathering intelligence essential to an ongoing combat mission to rescue three kidnapped American soldiers in Iraq.

As a result of the FISA court’s action, the Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Mike McConnell, came to the Senate Intelligence committee leaders -- Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Christopher Bond (R-Mo) -- in June and asked for urgent action to remedy the problem.
Congress procrastinated until the eve of the August recess when -- despite the outcries of the liberal media (the New York Times, again, and others) -- it passed a fix to the problem with a six-month sunset provision built in. Democrats were forced to accept the short-term extension because they wouldn’t agree to a provision that would give telecommunications companies immunity from civil lawsuits based on their good-faith cooperation with the government.

With the expiration date closing in, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) finally began floor action on the FISA bill. But he and the other liberals are trying to wheedle another short-term extension without the telecom immunity the intelligence community wants and needs. Both McConnells -- Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) and Director of National Intelligence Adm. Mike McConnell -- have rejected the idea. Reid, as of last night, seemed ready to play that game out all too long.

Reid's inability to get agreement among the Dems he supposedly leads frustrated the entire Senate last night. First, Reid threatened that FISA would be allowed to expire, trying desperately to get a short-term extension. When Minority Leader McConnell blocked the move and filed a cloture motion, Reid was forced to schedule the vote on cloture for Monday afternoon.
Earlier this week, Sen. Bond told me in an interview that, “Congress has had six months to act. To stall legislation needed to help our intelligence community prevent attacks and protect American lives is not only irresponsible, it’s dangerous.” He added, “Failure to act could leave our country deaf and dumb, handcuffing our intelligence operators who are fighting to protect American families in the war against Islamic extremism.”

The fate of the Senate bill may depend on the New York Times editorial page.
Reid usually defers to the Times’ judgment. In an August 3 press conference, as the Senate was about to pass the FISA revision, Reid was asked if he thought the Bush administration was stampeding Congress into acting too quickly, Reid literally pulled that day’s lead New York Times editorial on the subject (titled, “Stampeding Congress Again”) and displayed it to the television cameras saying, “Here’s my answer.” Yesterday’s Senate votes were conducted without that sort of guidance. If the New York Times comes out against the bill again this morning, Reid will probably follow its orders.

The House bill would be a disaster for intelligence agencies. It would -- for the first time in American history -- impose a requirement to obtain a FISA court warrant to intercept communications of persons reasonably believed to be overseas. And (in another blatantly unconstitutional provision) military intelligence gathering would be subjected to FISA court proceedings.

Think about that. Put yourself in the boots of a SEAL platoon leader trying to determine if you’re walking into an al-Queda ambush. You probably need -- right now, not ten hours from now -- intelligence about a bunch of guys sitting two kilometers over some hill in Afghanistan. If any of them may be in contact with anyone in the United States, you have to get a warrant from the FISA court to listen in on his cell phone.

It all boils down to this: the House bill will cause the deaths of Americans on the battlefield. When the Senate bill passes -- which is likely Monday afternoon -- the House will be left with less than a week to conference its bill with the Senate and agree to a version that the president will sign.

President Bush has indicated he will veto a bill that doesn’t include the telecom immunity provision. Other aspects of the House bill will also result in a veto. And if the law expires, much of our intelligence gathering -- essential to saving American lives, and not only in combat -- will stop.

Will the Democrats be so cavalier with American lives? Read the next few days of the New York Times editorials for the answer.
- Jed Babbin, Human Events Editor

Where's your refund?

Because of the Congress' late fix to the alternative minimum tax, millions of Americans will have to wait for their income tax refund this year. Here is one reason why:

Last December we witnessed a rare event as Charles Schumer, Democrat Senator from New York and Charlie Rangel, Democrat Representative from New York both actively supported the discontinuance of the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Hard to believe that two Tax and Spend Democrats would want to cut a tax, especially dyed-in- the- wool taxers like these two.

A little background on the AMT: during the 1960’s a few wealthy people were able to avoid paying any federal income tax due to high allowable deductions; this was unacceptable to Democrats so Congress in 1969 passed the AMT to extract a tax payment from the “wealthy.” Over the years this tax went on auto-pilot and had no indexing for inflation; gradually more and more people got caught in this AMT that was meant for rich people.


However, there’s always a however, New York City is one of the high income parts of the country and as incomes rose since the 60’s, the AMT began to catch more and more of these “wealthy” people. The past couple of years thousands of not-so-wealthy people got caught up in AMT and taxpayer unrest began to mount. Interestingly, it didn’t really bother congress one bit, they happily spent the money. That’s when Schumer and Rangel started to get serious heat from their voters in New York City--voters, good Democrats who like tax and spend policies, suddenly found themselves paying federal taxes under AMT, and they did not like it.

When it comes to taxes versus votes there is no contest in the analysis of Schumer and Rangel. Taxes that cost them votes are clearly unfair; the taxes must go. As we saw this past December, the two Charlies played Santa Claus. Their voters got a package containing an AMT “free pass.”
Hal Neff Bismarck

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Housing news from CNNMoney.com

Bismarck, N.D.

Key stat: Over the past 12 months, the median home price in Bismarck jumped 15.3%, to lead the nation.

It was a big gain, according to the National Association of Realtors, but it brought the median house price there to only $161,600. No high-priced markets grew nearly as fast. Among high-priced cities, the San Jose, Calif. metro area, where the median price rose to $852,500, recorded the highest percentage increase at 9.4%.

Friday, January 18, 2008

Get Involved

I have had the opportunity to hear Governor John Hoeven speak twice in the past 5 days and each time I was impressed by his passion for our great state of North Dakota. He spoke from the heart, with no notes, and stressed the importance of becoming involved in the political process.

As you're reading this, you are probably thinking: "I'm already involved", and you would be right, to a point. Being involved can mean a lot of things:

- Get informed: reading blogs, magazine articles or candidate profiles, watching the news
- Volunteer: stuff envelopes for campaigns, make phone calls, go door to door
- Talk to people: reach out to those who are independent or undecided and point them toward sources where they can find the truth. Write a letter to the editor or call a radio talk show.

These are just a few ideas I came up with and I'm sure you can think of more. As the Presidential Caucus draws near, I challenge each of you to bring a friend that wasn't planning on participating. Show them how much fun and educational the political process can be.

As Governor Hoeven said last night, "Those that participate make the difference."

- Deb Seminary, Communications Director

Monday, January 14, 2008

The Democrats' Fairy Tale

From The New York Times
By William Kristol
Op-Ed
January 14, 2008

[O]bama has been pretty consistent in his opposition to the war. But ... Obama's view of the current situation in Iraq is out of touch with reality. In this, however, Obama is at one with Hillary Clinton and the entire leadership of the Democratic Party.

When President Bush announced the surge of troops ... Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Democratic Congressional leaders predicted failure. Obama ... told Larry King that he didn't believe additional U.S. troops would "make a significant dent in the sectarian violence that's taking place there." Then in April, the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, asserted that "this war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything." In September, Clinton told Gen. David Petraeus that his claims of progress in Iraq required a "willing suspension of disbelief."

The Democrats were wrong in their assessments of the surge. Attacks per week on American troops are now down about 60 percent from June. Civilian deaths are down approximately 75 percent from a year ago. December 2007 saw the second-lowest number of U.S. troops killed in action since March 2003. ...

Do Obama and Clinton and Reid now acknowledge that they were wrong? Are they willing to say the surge worked?

No. ... When asked recently whether she stood behind her "willing suspension of disbelief" insult to General Petraeus, Clinton said, "That's right."

When Obama was asked in the most recent Democratic presidential debate, "Would you have seen this kind of greater security in Iraq if we had followed your recommendations to pull the troops out last year?" he didn't directly address the question. But he volunteered that ... "We should start negotiating now." ...

Last year's success ... was made possible by confidence among Iraqis that U.S. troops would stay and help protect them ... [W]e have been able to turn around the situation in Iraq. ...

Yesterday, on "Meet the Press," Hillary Clinton claimed that the Iraqis are changing their ways in part because of the Democratic candidates' "commitment to begin withdrawing our troops in January of 2009." So the Democratic Party, having proclaimed that the war is lost and having sought to withdraw U.S. troops, deserves credit for any progress that may have been achieved in Iraq.

That is truly a fairy tale. ...
To View The Entire Article, Please Visit: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/14/opinion/14kristol.html?hp

Your Tax Dollars at Work

Roads? Bridges? No, not this time. Take a look at the January 11, 2008 issue of the Bismarck Tribune page 8A lower half. “WOPILA, Our Gratitude” with a nice photo of Senator Byron Dorgan, and beside it a smaller photo of Senator Dorgan with UTTC President David Gipp and an unidentified Indian woman in full costume. The purpose of the ad paid for by United Tribes Technical College is a message of profuse thanks for the funding secured by Dorgan for the UTTC. The glowing praise for Dorgan could not be more effusive had it been written by Dorgan’s staff for a political poster. This UTTC paid-for ad is a letter from David Gipp, President of UTTC to Dorgan thanking him for the money and citing him for his accomplishment on behalf of the Tribal people.

This is an abuse of tax money and an outrage! Where does one begin? Let’s start with the use of federal tax dollars to pay for a political ad. There is nothing in this ad that requires it be run as a paid-for public letter or notice. This letter, if it needed to written at all, should have been on one page of letter stationery, signed by Gipp, posted with a 41 cent stamp and sent to Dorgan. Instead the taxpayers paid what? Possibly one thousand seven hundred dollars (per the Tribune). $1700 versus 41 cents.

A second concern and yet more serious. This ad has all the looks of political advocacy for a particular person--a paid political promotion-- for the benefit of Senator Dorgan. It was paid for by UTTC, directly or indirectly, with tax dollars received through a grant obtained by Senator Dorgan. The statement in the letter is very clear about the reason. This is a nice way to pay back a favor--you get some money for us--we’ll run a nice ad giving you all the credit--out of gratitude you will get lots of votes. All paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.

The good senator will protest that he did not solicit this ad. He may well be insulated from the actions that put it into print, but it stretches belief that Pres. Gipp did this as a “surprise” without the knowledge of the Senator or his staff. It will be interesting to hear the Senator’s explanation.

Hal Neff

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

Democrat donations worth another look

I recently took the opportunity to challenge my Democrat counterparts over the
embarrassing revelation that they had solicited and received $10,000 last year from controversial Mississippi trial lawyer Richard “Dickie” Scruggs.

Scruggs is one of the big-money, out-of-state contributors that
bankroll the operations of North Dakota’s Democrats. Scruggs has made hundreds of millions of dollars for himself suing American businessmen and women. But Mr. Scruggs’ run of legal success seems to be screeching to a halt.

He now stands accused of judicial bribery. In fact, just weeks ago the FBI raided the offices of the law firm hired to defend him.

Most politicians are now fleeing Scruggs faster than a North Dakota Pronghorn Antelope. In fact, Bill and Hillary Clinton cancelled a fundraiser recently set for Scruggs’ home.

My own suggestion, was North Dakota Democrats consider donating their Scruggs’ money to a worthy charity.

But what is most remarkable about this episode is not that the North Dakota Democrat Party received money from someone like Dickie Scruggs. To be
fair, something embarrassing can happen to a contributor to any party or candidate, though most would have the good sense to return the money ASAP. What is remarkable is the pattern of fundraising abuses that seem to plague North Dakota Democrats.

It is this pattern of behavior that should concern North Dakotans. Something is seriously wrong with how North Dakota Democrats have come to operate in the
field of political fundraising. Consider the growing list of Democrat finance fiascos:

In 2006, the North Dakota Democrat Party forfeited $44,000 in illegal corporate
contributions after being roundly criticized for flouting the state’s campaign finance laws.

In 2005, Democrat US Senator Byron Dorgan became ensnared in the Jack Abramoff influence peddling scandal. Dorgan was pressured to return $67,000
dollars in Abramoff-tainted contributions. As reported by the Associated Press, the issue was intertwined with his 2003 involvement with a
Massachusetts Indian Tribe seeking federal recognition, and a 2001 fundraiser he hosted in a sports arena skybox with Abramoff ties.

But it does not stop there. An analysis of the North Dakota Democrats most recent year end finance report reveals a list of bizarre fundraising choices: $10,000 from a New Jersey rice trader who was deeply involved with disgraced former US Senator Robert Torricelli.

$10,000 over the last two election cycles from a political action committee organized to advance “bisexual rights,” among other things. $10,000 from the head of the Clinton-cozy satellite company that was forced to pay $14 million in fines for passing sensitive missile technology to communist China. $10,000 from a liberal Hollywood insider, received on election day.

Well over $100,000 from asbestos trial lawyers around the country.

In light of all this, it pays to remember that the current North Dakota Democrat Party Chairman, David Strauss, played a key role in a major
national scandal. Strauss was Al Gore’s deputy chief of staff who helped arrange and later attended the now infamous Buddhist Temple Fundraiser. It would appear the experience did little to chasten Mr. Strauss’ fundraising ethic.

Any objective review of campaign finance records on file with the Secretary of State’s office would conclude that the state’s Democrats have become a subsidiary of some very questionable out-of-state interests. By comparison, North Dakota Republicans tend to be funded to a greater extent by smaller, North Dakota donors.

From Scruggs to Strauss, Dorgan to Abramoff, bisexual rights activists to asbestos litigators, the story of the North Dakota Democrats and their
reckless fundraising is an ongoing saga. As we enter another election year these are things worthy of voters’ consideration. On one hand, you will have Republican candidates supported mainly by actual North Dakotans. On the Democrat side, candidates will be brought to you largely by a collection of big money donors who neither live here, nor share our values.

The difference could not be more stark.
- Gary Emineth, State Chairman

New Hampshire Predictions from the Evans-Novak Political Report

New Hampshire Predictions: Obama Blowout; Romney Rallying

McCain had seemed a clear winner over Romney in New Hampshire with two days left before the Republican voting, but Romney is coming back fast.Obama looks like a winner over Clinton in Tuesday's New Hampshire primary, which will be damaging but not fatal to her Democratic presidential candidacy.Here is our New Hampshire outlook based on a personal reporting trip by Robert Novak:

Republican
Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) had pulled even with front-running former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney prior to the Iowa caucuses and pulled ahead based on Romney's disappointing second-place finish in Iowa.

After Saturday night's ABC debate, Romney, from neighboring Massachusetts, seemed to be in freefall. The other candidates personally dislike him, and they ganged up on him. The only problem for McCain appeared to be that he overplayed his hand in going after Romney with too much vehemence and personal animosity.

But Romney made a remarkable comeback in Sunday night's Fox News debate, dominating his opponents. He capitalized on McCain's weaknesses on tax and immigration policy. We attended a focus group of mainly undecided Republican voters arranged for Fox by pollster Frank Luntz. They entered the room before the debate widely divided and left it after the debate heavily for Romney -- because of the immigration issue.

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee never was expected to repeat his Iowa win in the less fertile soil of New Hampshire, but his performance in the Fox debate was truly dreadful. The Luntz focus group hated Huckabee's refusal to answer questions about his record.

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was not long ago battling Romney for the New Hampshire lead, but he abandoned the state a few weeks back as part of his "big-state" strategy and over the past weekend did little there except participate in the debates. Like McCain, he suffers because of the immigration issue.

If McCain does win in New Hampshire, he will be the new national frontrunner. Romney may be finished, with Giuliani given the best chance of overcoming McCain.

Our shaky New Hampshire projection on election eve:
1st Place: McCain, but vulnerable.2nd Place: Romney, but rallying.3rd Place: Huckabee.4th Place: Giuliani.5th Place: Former Sen. Fred Thompson (Tenn.).

Democratic

The third-place finish in Iowa by Sen. Hillary Clinton (N.Y.) had a negative impact in New Hampshire, where she had been slipping against Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) even before her loss in Iowa. It is beginning to look like a double-digit loss for Clinton.

She was supposed to come out swinging against Obama in New Hampshire, but her boring, pedantic campaign style had not really changed from Iowa. At one rally where we were present, Clinton never mentioned Obama by name and criticized him only once (on healthcare) as "one of my opponents." Former President Bill Clinton, campaigning separately, is sprightlier but no more effective.

In contrast, "Obamamania" reigns supreme -- generating enthusiasm not seen since the 1968 campaign of Robert F. Kennedy. He attracts new voters and generates support across ideological and party lines. In truth, he worries Republicans sick, but for now, he threatens the long, slowly built Clinton campaign.
Former Sen. John Edwards (N.C.), who dwells on finishing ahead of Clinton in Iowa, looks like the odd man out in New Hampshire, with very little interest in him.
Clinton will not drop out after New Hampshire, as has been reported, and she can still stop Obama in the big states. But it will not be easy or automatic.

Our election eve projection for New Hampshire:
1st Place: Obama, going away.2nd Place: Clinton.3rd Place: Edwards.4th Place: New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson

Friday, January 04, 2008

To The National Geographic: regarding the January 2008 article: The Emptied Prairie.

Many of us are disaapointed at the January issue of the National Geographic Magazine article" The Emptied Prairie" showing North Dakota in a series of abandoned farm buildings, schools and cars languishing in an empty, snowy grassland. The article was written by Charles Bowden and there is no way of knowing what objective or agenda he had in mind, but it is clearly single-minded in its theme--this part of the country is dying--no, it's already dead. I sent the following comment to NG at their e-mail address: ngsforum@nationalgeographic.com.

The Emptied Prairie piece in the National Geographic of Jan. 2008 hits one mark and misses so many others--yes, there are lots of ghosts here--farms, small towns, immigrants, and people who passed through. Is our landscape open and nearly devoid of man's work? Yes, some of it is. The stories you missed are those of thousands of immigrants who came here from an oppressed Europe at the turn of the 19th to the 20th century. Some of the poorest of the poor from middle-Europe, Ukraine, Norway and Sweden, all seeking a chance for a better life, not necessarily for themselves, but for their sons and daughters some not yet born. Not told in your story was the success that came out of the first generation's struggle. Their sons and daughters not only survived and prospered, but they became educated and moved into the so-called American Dream--vindicating the hardship and fulfilling the dreams of their grandparents. I am one of those. I've lived and worked in a dozen of our great states, and I have chosen to live here. I am home. The photography of The Emptied Prairie is superb, but you missed the real story.
Hal Neff Bismarck, ND